TBF, I think Simon or the accountants or whoever at CT Towers would have checked first. To say it's all Fisher's doing is pushing it even for you.
The story isn't the telegraph misled CCFC fans, the story is a CCFC executive has misled fans.
Does Tony sell ice cream?
The story isn't the telegraph misled CCFC fans, the story is a CCFC executive has misled fans.
I've spoken to him a few times, good guy. Hate's SISU.
Thing is, if the telegraph print it. They do actually mislead fans?
I am pretty sure if Simon says something or tim Fisher says something, more people would believe simon?
Although I don't think anybody is calling for simon to be sacked or slating him, like I am sure you would if it was Les reid?
When have I ever called for LR to be sacked?
Mocked his recent articles, yes. Called for him to be sacked, no. And neither would I ever do.
When have I ever called for LR to be sacked?
Mocked his recent articles, yes. Called for him to be sacked, no. And neither would I ever do.
calling for simon to be sacked or slating him
Mocked his recent articles, yes
I don't disagree. However, I still think that the figures should have been checked first, don't you? I thought that would have been number one at the top of the list of journalism "do's".
Local journalists have never been questioned on here before, have they? Or is it just Simon you're concerned for.
Clearly they should have been double checked (I assume that they were checked).
I'm sure Simon can look after himself as can LR.
My concern is that it is overshadowing the real story. Simon may have an account on here and can answer directly. Mr Fisher doesn't have an account (we believe) on here but you can be damn sure he read's what's on here and why should it be comfortable reading for him when he's trying to spin (another word for bullshit) us with distractions like the CT got it wrong?
No. But if that's a serious question I think I've met the guy you're on about. He has a pitch at Brandon on one of the bends and has CCFC stickers in the back window. I've spoken to him a few times, good guy. Hate's SISU.
Clearly they should have been double checked (I assume that they were checked).
I'm sure Simon can look after himself as can LR.
My concern is that it is overshadowing the real story. Simon may have an account on here and can answer directly. Mr Fisher doesn't have an account (we believe) on here but you can be damn sure he read's what's on here and why should it be comfortable reading for him when he's trying to spin (another word for bullshit) us with distractions like the CT got it wrong?
Remember the outcry after his JS interview. I don't remember you or others being so understanding about a "local journalist" then.
So Tim Fisher made the CET print the wrong story to distract from the real issues?
Do you supply him with ice cream?
Seem to get a lot of people screaming on here.
I think you'll find I was communicating with Les directly at the time and posted several posts on his behalf having also asked questions on other poster's behalf. So you're very wrong. I was very understanding.
do you ever post about football?
Thing is, if the telegraph print it. They do actually mislead fans?
I am pretty sure if Simon says something or tim Fisher says something, more people would believe simon?
Although I don't think anybody is calling for simon to be sacked or slating him, like I am sure you would if it was Les reid?
Interesting comments from football expert Keiran Maguire on CWR this morning at 21:32
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02jrjph
The future isn't that bright with or without the new stadium it would seem and relies on consistently unearthing star players to sell on
Who's RFC then? I thought that was him!Clearly they should have been double checked (I assume that they were checked).
Mr Fisher doesn't have an account (we believe) on here
Who's RFC then? I thought that was him!
Just listened to this and found it thoroughly depressing. The University Lecturer in Football finance basically said we are bust , spending 140% of income on wages, our wage bill is not that high for league One and he cannot see what SISU's business plan is other than to get lucky.
Maybe Tim just found his lucky pants eh? I suppose he will be lucky if they are ever able to take out the 9 Million a year in dividends as per the new shares
Interesting comments from football expert Keiran Maguire on CWR this morning at 21:32
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02jrjph
The future isn't that bright with or without the new stadium it would seem and relies on consistently unearthing star players to sell on
Interesting comments from football expert Keiran Maguire on CWR this morning at 21:32
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02jrjph
The future isn't that bright with or without the new stadium it would seem and relies on consistently unearthing star players to sell on
wont even be that oldfiver because the P&L account is currently at minus 76m. I think he probably meant makes a distributable profit. The rest of what he said still makes sense
It would seem that the right to 15% accrues over the years irrespective until such time as distributable profits are available
Its all cloud cuckoo land but it does lock any profit a new investor might foresee in to SISU & ARVO.
Not too many profitable clubs around and certainly not many profitable ones that boast the best things have been in years and are a minimum of 11m in interest bearing debt - let alone preference shares
Exceptional circumstances though for the years accounts, it isn't typical of a regular year.Just listened to this and found it thoroughly depressing. The University Lecturer in Football finance basically said we are bust , spending 140% of income on wages, our wage bill is not that high for league One and he cannot see what SISU's business plan is other than to get lucky.
Maybe Tim just found his lucky pants eh? I suppose he will be lucky if they are ever able to take out the 9 Million a year in dividends as per the new shares
Exceptional circumstances though for the years accounts, it isn't typical of a regular year.
When was it ever?
wont even be that oldfiver because the P&L account is currently at minus 76m. I think he probably meant makes a distributable profit. The rest of what he said still makes sense
It would seem that the right to 15% accrues over the years irrespective until such time as distributable profits are available to pay it - cant see that ever happening to be honest
Its all cloud cuckoo land but it does lock any profit a new investor might foresee in to SISU & ARVO.
Not too many profitable clubs around and certainly not many profitable ones that boast the best things have been in years and are a minimum of 11m in interest bearing debt - let alone preference shares
I have to assume this is all being done to benefit the investors first and foremost not the club
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?