That we'll known clichéJust got home, Bidwell MOM for me. Just wish they’d bloody shoot now and again.
They were there for the taking, but yes I’m gonna say it “ we go shading on Saturday’
PUSB
Bloody text sorted now!!That we'll known cliché
For this reason we should (when fit) play 1 up top and COH and Palmer behind. I actually felt sorry for Godden at times as Vik doesn't really want a strike partner and just wants to be direct. Very few forwards are able to play the lone forward role but it suits Vik and we should embrace it. As much as I rate Goddens finishing we have now played 3 games and scored 1 goal with 2 up front. Waghorn to play in the 10 slot with Palmer next game might be a good idea and help us control possession more.
Agreed, after the first half hour at Luton no way would anyone have predicted 3 and a half clean sheets. Robins knows what he's doing while waiting for Cal to be back fitNo chance anyone would have predicted we'd not concede a goal with this back three. Madness. Kudos to Robins and the coaching staff.
Mate we're 5 points adrift at the bottom playing a team who are shite and lost 3 games in a row. If we're not allowed to want to actually win a winnable game, what's the point
Mate we're 5 points adrift at the bottom playing a team who are shite and lost 3 games in a row. If we're not allowed to want to actually win a winnable game, what's the point
And yet we should have beaten Bristol. Good point, frustrating it wasn't 3.2 of those 3 games were away at Burnley and Norwich, not sure that's a great barometer.
I’d go could rather than shouldAnd yet we should have beaten Bristol. Good point, frustrating it wasn't 3.
Yeah we played ok but to say we should of beaten a decent as per league form side away is a stretchI’d go could rather than should
Remember when everyone was crying about us signing kidsHe’s been a very astute signing.
Astutes Sunderland connections help get him in?He’s been a very astute signing.
He has made more tackles and won more duels (per 90) this season than he did last.I think it is the lack of tackling with Sheaf which seems odd. This time last year he was winning the ball so much more
How was Doyle second half for you
Nah rose always on the back foot Doyle much better option in the back 3As I said Doyle was slow and got beat several times too easily which could have resulted in goals. he's brave and does a lot right but positionally is suspect at times. We were lucky not to concede when they just left him for dead at the by line and crossed into the box. I like him but tbf he is on the wrong side of the defense. Rose would be the better option all day. And if you did not see any of that then get your eye sight tested.
As I said Doyle was slow and got beat several times too easily which could have resulted in goals. he's brave and does a lot right but positionally is suspect at times. We were lucky not to concede when they just left him for dead at the by line and crossed into the box. I like him but tbf he is on the wrong side of the defense. Rose would be the better option all day. And if you did not see any of that then get your eye sight tested.
As I said Doyle was slow and got beat several times too easily which could have resulted in goals. he's brave and does a lot right but positionally is suspect at times. We were lucky not to concede when they just left him for dead at the by line and crossed into the box. I like him but tbf he is on the wrong side of the defense. Rose would be the better option all day. And if you did not see any of that then get your eye sight tested.
I meant the last couple of games, and it feels he isn't winning the ball so much.He has made more tackles and won more duels (per 90) this season than he did last.
When everyone but you thinks the opposite, you may want to consider whether it’s you that needs an eye test.
Once again do you actually watch the games as what you post about them is at best in a long distance relationship with what happened in the actual game.As I said Doyle was slow and got beat several times too easily which could have resulted in goals. he's brave and does a lot right but positionally is suspect at times. We were lucky not to concede when they just left him for dead at the by line and crossed into the box. I like him but tbf he is on the wrong side of the defense. Rose would be the better option all day. And if you did not see any of that then get your eye sight tested.
I dont think Paxman has ever watched the same game as me.When everyone but you thinks the opposite, you may want to consider whether it’s you that needs an eye test.
Ok have it your way, but look back at the game and see how all too easily he was beaten and left for dead. Rose is quicker and you do Rose a disservice. Rose also is a threat from corners in the oppo's box. I'm not saying Rose is great by any means but beleive he is the better option than what I'm seeing from Doyle playing on the right side. It's a game of opinions and time will tell.
Rose may be quicker, but Doyle seems to be the more composed and less likely to get into a position where he needs pace to get out of it. It's not ideal having a left footer on the right, but it's not like Rose was some colossus that no-one was beating.Ok have it your way, but look back at the game and see how all too easily he was beaten and left for dead. Rose is quicker and you do Rose a disservice. Rose also is a threat from corners in the oppo's box. I'm not saying Rose is great by any means but beleive he is the better option than what I'm seeing from Doyle playing on the right side. It's a game of opinions and time will tell.
Rose may be quicker, but Doyle seems to be the more composed and less likely to get into a position where he needs pace to get out of it. It's not ideal having a left footer on the right, but it's not like Rose was some colossus that no-one was beating.
As it stands since Rose went off and we've had a back three of Panzo, Fadz and Doyle we've not conceded in 3 and a half games. So it can't be that bad.
I don’t think there’s a defence in the league that Tavares isn’t hypothetically capable of tearing apart single handedly, he’s hypothetically fucking amazing.
Yea really not sure how you got to that from a suggestion of bringing someone with pace on against a high line playing a midfielder at CB.
I swear it must be almost every match thread he's on the bench that someone suggests it. It's like teams actually find it impossible to defend against a striker with pace ("Play him in behind! They're playing a high line!! Tired legs!!!"). But we just mysteriously refuse to try it every time. Wonder why.
He got done a couple of times by Semenyo, but he's a very decent player.
I think he would have had a lot more success against Rose.
Ahem5 points adrift?
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Not sure football porn is quite how I would describe them!! Regardless are you suggesting bringing in COH for Godden somehow makes us weaker defensively?As much as a front trio of COH, Palmer and Vik is football porn I do worry there may not be enough goals there. We will need a clean sheet most weeks.
Not sure football porn is quite how I would describe them!! Regardless are you suggesting bringing in COH for Godden somehow makes us weaker defensively?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?