this has always been the issue when people say SISU should just sell. Unless you have a connection to the club who in their right mind thinks we're a better takeover target than pretty much every other club in the countryit is a bit easier to buy a club if you have everything in place.
this has always been the issue when people say SISU should just sell. Unless you have a connection to the club who in their right mind thinks we're a better takeover target than pretty much every other club in the country
this has always been the issue when people say SISU should just sell. Unless you have a connection to the club who in their right mind thinks we're a better takeover target than pretty much every other club in the country
Derby technically don’t own their ground and despite being the ultimate basket case on top still have some white knights in a queue.
Out of interest - how many teams don't own their grounds and have a lease deal with another party - club owner or otherwise.
Anyone know? We can't be the only ones, surely?
i doubt any club owner is stupid enough to own the ground without a separate holding company
I doubt there are many - if any - that have such a short sub lease
So you think there's no one like us? Genuine question - I would've thought out of 90 odd clubs, we wouldn't be the only ones on such a deal. Could be wrong though.
Birmingham ?Actually I do know of one and the lease is about to expire and the club has no solution I think
Birmingham ?
Newport do...I doubt there are many - if any - that have such a short sub lease
BirminghAm have 9 years too. So 3 teams
Newport do...
In an emergency, there'd probably be the ability for an emergency retrenchment to Spytty. That makes the Withdean look high luxury however, and could set them back.yes lol and it hasn’t been renewed…
In an emergency, there'd probably be the ability for an emergency retrenchment to Spytty. That makes the Withdean look high luxury however, and could set them back.
YupThe Withdean was Brighton, no?
I guess my point being, that I wonder if any other clubs with ground issues, have been bought by a knight in shining armour?
A rare occasion that I agree with big G. Getting a sale with our situation will be nigh on impossible.
I just wondered if there were exceptions to the rule.
Getting a sale would be easy if the price is right, undoubtedly whatever sisu would want to relinquish ownership is unrealistic.
Well that’s the issue especially as Boddy has admitted unless we can negotiate a lease extension with Wasps we are homeless in 7 seasons
Likely to happen though, don't you think (regardless of your feelings for DB)? Looking at the trajectories of both clubs, we seem to be going in the right direction (on the pitch) and them, not so.
7 years is a long time granted but if an extension is needed to cover any period to a new ground (although unlikely) or just in general, you'd hope that with relationships seemingly thawing, it wouldn't be an issue.
I guess whatever happens over the next 6-7 years will shape that though.
It hasn’t happened for Newport
Yeah, but we're not Newport.
Not so long ago it wasn't like that, no reason it won't reverse again.Likely to happen though, don't you think (regardless of your feelings for DB)? Looking at the trajectories of both clubs, we seem to be going in the right direction (on the pitch) and them, not so.
Not so long ago it wasn't like that, no reason it won't reverse again.
I dunno, if the, what, 44 year lease we had with ACL was too short, this one certainly is. Frankly I'd be all for the short-term leases while we build a new ground... if the second part of that equation had the faintest possibility of happening.
Well, what's absolutely not going to change is us moving into our brand new stadium!Yeah, I agree. Hence the 7 years being a long time as things can change.
No but the CEO is the same
Well, what's absolutely not going to change is us moving into our brand new stadium!
Likely to happen though, don't you think (regardless of your feelings for DB)? Looking at the trajectories of both clubs, we seem to be going in the right direction (on the pitch) and them, not so.
7 years is a long time granted but if an extension is needed to cover any period to a new ground (although unlikely) or just in general, you'd hope that with relationships seemingly thawing, it wouldn't be an issue.
I guess whatever happens over the next 6-7 years will shape that though.
The problem is 'likely to' isn't a very stable foundation on which to build a football club.
Not so long ago it wasn't like that, no reason it won't reverse again.
I dunno, if the, what, 44 year lease we had with ACL was too short, this one certainly is. Frankly I'd be all for the short-term leases while we build a new ground... if the second part of that equation had the faintest possibility of happening.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?