Are you thick or just ignorant or both?
The asset is protected. The company shouldn't be given assistance, no.
If you owned a business in Coventry that was struggling and the bank called in your loan, what do you think CCC would say to you if you asked them to provide a loan to keep you afloat?
Why have you posted in here? Don't you normally start a new thread for every post?
Both I suppose if that is what it means to not agree with your view.
What has it got to do with anyone else asking them for a loan? What don't you understand about them looking after their own asset? Yet you bring in companies with nothing to do with CCC.
He doesn't understand the simple concept that regardless of its ownership, ACL is a private limited company and as such is competing in the open market with other private companies.
Jesus wept
I was taught be sure of your case in legal action. You don't want any surprises. I can't believe that sisu are fishing for information. Too risky
Do you remember what happened last time Joy was in court? The judge didn't say anything complementary about her and her memory. The case was thrown out of court.
This could easily be the last throw of the dice for SISU. The last time I remember them telling the truth was when they said we were moving to Northampton.
According to some though, the JR would never happen as it would be laughed out of court?
You agree with me then. They haven't denied it (but there may be reasons why).
The last time SISU went to court they were granted a judicial review, despite the consensus on here being that they didn't have a case to even get that far.
The JR hasn't happened though. What did the first judge say when he saw the evidence? The second one said there might be a reason for it to be looked at.
Well turnover has increased, but what counts is cash available for servicing the debt after paying for anything essential (which includes investment to sustain the business). You are trying to make it too simple and absolute.
Isn't it June?
According to some though, the JR would never happen as it would be laughed out of court?
Why have you posted in here? Don't you normally start a new thread for every post?
Well if people stopped posting shit like this, why is it irrelevant?
He'll be along in a minute with something profound I'm sure
135 posts on a thread that is irrelevant
136 counting this
I am gob smacked
Fairplay Grendel you must be chuckling your ass off.
We have never been told ACL is completely independent
It was originally
You must admit it is bizarre to have one judge literally laugh it out of court not even allowing the question to be asked.
Then another allow the question to be asked.
Some people seem to want it all ways though, a bit like a cum slut at a swingers party.
And we also know of other allegations they have made over this.....and have had to backtrack when questioned elsewhere. Like when they tried to say that ACL was trading at a loss......then admitted they didn't know.
To me they have been fishing for answers and something they can use against CCC. You would think that they would have proof of something like this if it did happen. Like wanting the freehold and having independent valuers be able to look at the books. All we have had so far is threats and allegations from SISU. Not one shread of evidence on anything. To me if they had anything it would be on the offal like other things seem to find their way on.
I am no expert in law but wouldn't like to say.
I just know that some people on here said it would never happen, it is happening... take from that what you will?
No doubt the judge is corrupt, a friend of joys etc.
Some people seem to want it all ways though, a bit like a cum slut at a swingers party.
Some people seem to want it all ways though, a bit like a cum slut at a swingers party.
I take from it
It was laughed out of court
Then we have moved to let's let them ask the question
So I still think that is quite far away from SISU will win in my own opinion.
A decision just needs to quickly. Fingers crossed an appeal process is not allowed and we wi then be back in Coventry one way or the other.
I take from it
It was laughed out of court
Then we have moved to let's let them ask the question
So I still think that is quite far away from SISU will win in my own opinion.
A decision just needs to quickly. Fingers crossed an appeal process is not allowed and we wi then be back in Coventry one way or the other.
Its wholly relevant as it will be a vital element regarding the JR and therefore critical to our future. Its also making for amusing reading as Godiva and Fernando make the same key points over and over again and astute fails to get the points over and over again.
As for not being relevant well Don I think you should perhaps look in the mirror to find that.
Now that its pretty clear the maths don't add up for building a new stadium, taken in conjunction with the accounts suggesting ACL are sustainable without CCFC. The more poignant question is
If SISU win the JR what will they do
If they lose what will they do.
Personally I think both ways Coventry will return to the Ricoh. But only via the first method will it be without SISU
It's Friday afternoon again isn't it?
Isn't that unrelated to the original posts too?
I am no expert in law but wouldn't like to say.
I just know that some people on here said it would never happen, it is happening... take from that what you will?
No doubt the judge is corrupt, a friend of joys etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?