Just use a couple of hot air balloons on fisher and his car next time please Peter
</p>pwkh only answers when it suits</p>
<p> </p>
<p>balloon gate!!!</p>
<p>PWKH - you have made money out of ccfc</p>
<p>you supposedly support the city of coventry</p>
<p>a football club is integral to that city</p>
<p>stop helping to destroy the club - and grow up
the £12,000 quotation is one that ccfc obtained from farol ltd for the maintenance and repair of the equipment owned by but used and maintained by ccfc. 50% of the equipment is u/s at present. The work should have been done by ccfc and hasn't been. The trustees are quite happy to have a dialogue with ccfc if it will result in getting the academy back into the centre with everybody meeting their obligations. The maintenance of machinery is not included in any of the charges made for ccfc's use of the centre rental or otherwise.
This has nothing to do with acl.
The £12,000 quotation is one that CCFC obtained from Farol Ltd for the maintenance and repair of the equipment owned by but used and maintained by CCFC. 50% of the equipment is u/s at present. The work should have been done by CCFC and hasn't been. The Trustees are quite happy to have a dialogue with CCFC if it will result in getting the Academy back into the Centre with everybody meeting their obligations. The maintenance of machinery is not included in any of the charges made for CCFC's use of the Centre rental or otherwise.
This has nothing to do with ACL.
Straight answer again
Thanks Uncle P
Facts are important and I have to assume that you are not familiar with the suite of Agreements between AHCT and CCFC. In short and in reply to your guesswork and assumption: CCFC are NOT required to pay rent to use the four training pitches and one match pitch at the Centre. They are required to maintain the pitches to a proper standard at their expense and to maintain and service the equipment owned by the Trustees that they use to maintain the pitches. The capital cost of that equipment was £100,000: not just a couple of mowers as has been suggested. I expect that you are also labouring under another misconception that the Alan Edward Higgs Charity and the Alan Higgs Centre Trust are either one and the same or at least connected: they are not. There is also no connection between ACL and the Higgs Centre.
That's a serious allegation, do you have any evidence that PWKH has made money out of CCFC. Or did you mean the AEH Charity which I don't think has made any money out of CCFC as they don't get any dividends from ACL. Or did you mean ACL which probably has being the leaseholders of the Ricoh?pwkh only answers when it suits
balloon gate!!!
PWKH - you have made money out of ccfc
you supposedly support the city of coventry
a football club is integral to that city
stop helping to destroy the club - and grow up
Tied some balloons to a baffoons car - shows that he's got a sense of humour shoot him
Runs a charity that was set up with the pure aim to help improve the lives of people from Coventry - I'd take That as no hidden agenda
Turning the screw on a faceless entity that has as much transparency as a breeze block - won't be bullied
Over the past weeks and months Ive been turned into a schitzo should I support the club / the council / Higgs acl and like many of you I suppose you don't know who has the best intentions at heart but the only way I can judge it is by who gives us the straightest answers and it ain't sissu
Hi don you ok?
How d you mean like ?
Ahh thanks for clearing that up and I can assure him ive got my own views and by the sounds of it they don't fit with hisHe's accusing you of being another poster with a different ID because he finds your views unpalatable. He's like that.
I'll never forget back in the day when me and Torch got accused of being the same person
He's accusing you of being another poster with a different ID because he finds your views unpalatable. He's like that.
I'll never forget back in the day when me and Torch got accused of being the same person
Has this situation previously risen, if so how was it dealt with before?
Was Gregor Rioch correct in stating an invoice had not been sent to the club, if so is that how the matter has been previously been dealt with?
Is the maintenance of equipment done on a as required basis, or is it done during down times such as the end of the season?
Has the Academy met all other financial obligation this year, if so, is it not an over the top reaction to lock them out because of a faulty lawnmower?
Does the current state of the equipment cause difficulties in running the building / providing services to other customers?
Facts are important and I have to assume that you are not familiar with the suite of Agreements between AHCT and CCFC. In short and in reply to your guesswork and assumption: CCFC are NOT required to pay rent to use the four training pitches and one match pitch at the Centre. They are required to maintain the pitches to a proper standard at their expense and to maintain and service the equipment owned by the Trustees that they use to maintain the pitches. The capital cost of that equipment was £100,000: not just a couple of mowers as has been suggested. I expect that you are also labouring under another misconception that the Alan Edward Higgs Charity and the Alan Higgs Centre Trust are either one and the same or at least connected: they are not. There is also no connection between ACL and the Higgs Centre.
He's accusing you of being another poster with a different ID because he finds your views unpalatable. He's like that.
I'll never forget back in the day when me and Torch got accused of being the same person
I think you omitted saying who owed the machinery in your last post, you just say "owned by....."
I assume it is owned by the Higgs Trust.
The accademy pay RENT for using the centre - are they expected to maintain the center, paint the walls, mend the roof?
the RENT extends to use of the pitches.... why should they be expected to maintain the pitches? If they pay rent for it I think they should expect the grass to be cut for them! if it is not cut how could they use it?
If you own something you have full responsibility for it. If you RENT something you expect it to be fit for purpose!
Looks to me like you should have the responsibility for cutting the grass to provide a suitably playing field that they RENT and they only use the mowers if it hasn't been done! ...
Maybe they should send you a bill for cutting the grass when it was needed! - £24,000!
Gyre and gimble some more, I'm not convinced.
imp:
Did someone once accuse KDuffy and grendel being the same person ...oooooooooh
Strange that
How d you mean like ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?