Next Accounts Due: 28/02/2015
2015 is the date the accounts are due.
2015, not 2014.
Next Accounts Due: 28/02/2015
2015 is the date the accounts are due.
2015, not 2014.
yes ie they have just submitted the ones that were due on 28/02/2014 so now they are due on 28/02/2015
There is the same notice on both SBS&L and Otium
"Highlighted documents are not yet available for inspection"
Which confirms the club statement, accounts have been submitted
This is going to be fun then isn't it...all three sets of accounts available for (possibly?) the first time together?
Not that fun, the interesting stuff would have been in the accounts they have engineered the situation so they don't have to submit them and Otium don't even own the golden share in these accounts I think, we don't get to see how we are doing at sixfields etc.
True...but we are not going to get those are we so we'll have to make do with what we've got? Anyway it should be possible to draw some inferences for the future of both organisations from these accounts although I suspect next year's will be the real eye-openers, i.e. the accounts for 2013/14.
thought it looked too obvious!
Or of course you just got it completely wrong when you criticised others in a smart-arse way.... ;-)
The ACL ones aren't due til 13/06/14 are they?
Then I apologise Lord. I thought you got this wrong...... ;-)
So this covers all of last season right? So L1 income at the Ricoh, no rent paid. But not the admin or anything since then? Have I got the timings right?
Which players will have left since the figures in the accounts?
So basically income should be far higher but costs higher as well. Will be interesting to see if we had a balanced budget or a bounce back budget last year.
So this covers all of last season right? So L1 income at the Ricoh, no rent paid. But not the admin or anything since then? Have I got the timings right?
Which players will have left since the figures in the accounts?
So basically income should be far higher but costs higher as well. Will be interesting to see if we had a balanced budget or a bounce back budget last year.
So this covers all of last season right? So L1 income at the Ricoh, no rent paid. But not the admin or anything since then? Have I got the timings right?
Which players will have left since the figures in the accounts?
So basically income should be far higher but costs higher as well. Will be interesting to see if we had a balanced budget or a bounce back budget last year.
Yes. ACL's accounts will include rent paid through the holding account and Olympic revenue as well. However, the general outcome will be;
Look at ACL standing alone making a profit
CCFC are shit and need to get back to the Ricoh as ACL are moving on.
You've to to remember that a lot of the players that left the summer of after relegation left in June / July so we will have been paying 3-4 months wages out of this accounts on keogh, clingan, cranie etc.
We'll also be still making payments this financial year for the likes of bell and sheffers and the other bomb squad as part of their severance packages.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
If anyone is interested then all three sets of accounts are now available from Company House at £1 per set.
No need - OSB will have his analysis published here in a few hours ... and CT will print the analysis as their own in tomorrows edition.
If anyone is interested then all three sets of accounts are now available from Company House at £1 per set.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?