TomRad85
Well-Known Member
Recruitment is so important, has to be pretty much bang on.
Recruitment is so important, has to be pretty much bang on.It demonstrates that club is only viable when profits from player sales are included. Without them there is a £15/16m operating loss.
I'm wondering if transfer fees paid are incorporated into the administrative expenses which are £12m net of wages, that appears to be quite high. Admin expenses have grown £13m in a year where wages gave grown £5m, so the operating loss for the year is distorted.It demonstrates that club is only viable when profits from player sales are included. Without them there is a £15/16m operating loss.
The player would still be recognised in the accounts to May 24 as he became a Cov player from January with the amounts due to be paid to us included on the balance sheet as a debtor.Peterborough’s owner mentioned that it was agreed that the fee would be paid in the summer. A deferred payment may appear in the 2025 books potentially.
However, my (unqualified) assumption would be that for accounting purposes, the fee would’ve been paid in Jan.
They will yes. Although these will only be the actual fees paid. Don’t include the potential add ons in the future.I'm wondering if transfer fees paid are incorporated into the administrative expenses which are £12m net of wages, that appears to be quite high. Admin expenses have grown £13m in a year where wages gave grown £5m, so the operating loss for the year is distorted.
We have nearly doubled our not playing staff from 35 to 61 which is probably right for a club at the top end of the Championship.I'm wondering if transfer fees paid are incorporated into the administrative expenses which are £12m net of wages, that appears to be quite high. Admin expenses have grown £13m in a year where wages gave grown £5m, so the operating loss for the year is distorted.
It’s possible. I’m not an accounting expert and have used straight maths to come up with that number. I guess we paid some significant fees in that period, so perhaps my conclusion is incorrect.I'm wondering if transfer fees paid are incorporated into the administrative expenses which are £12m net of wages, that appears to be quite high. Admin expenses have grown £13m in a year where wages gave grown £5m, so the operating loss for the year is distorted.
Will add while player sales are unsustainable in the long term, the players we’ve added I can definitely see how we can replicate the player funds. Looking at Sheaf,Milan and Wright for the next three years plus Simms, Dovin and others.
Retro line keeping the club afloat
It demonstrates that club is only viable when profits from player sales are included. Without them there is a £15/16m operating loss.
Recruitment is so important, has to be pretty much bang on.
It demonstrates that club is only viable when profits from player sales are included. Without them there is a £15/16m operating loss.
Might have to cash in on one or two come summer. Nature of the beast unfortunately.
Unless we activate the extension then it doesnt drop too muchLikely to happen regardless.
Although Sheaf's value is probably well below what we'd want/need and below what we would have valued him at 6 months ago.
Think we're getting it more right than most tbf. Lets hope we can make it count while we are getting it right.Which is nigh on impossible, for any club.
Unless we get promotedMight have to cash in on one or two come summer. Nature of the beast unfortunately.
which we willUnless we activate the extension then it doesnt drop too much
Think we're getting it more right than most tbf. Lets hope we can make it count while we are getting it right.
Does this mean we have a 27 million wage bill
Yeh if you do get flops you want it to be the cheap ones though. If you get your big money ones wrong that's when you really start to fuck it. See Stoke as an example.Yeah, we do well.
But they'll always be Dasilvas and Collins's.
It's just the way it is, every club makes signings that don't come off.
That's just Binks isn't it?Does this mean we have a 27 million wage bill
Agreed and yet some people distrust and dont like him. Bizarre when you see what he's done for us and how things are goingTo be fair to King he's put his money where his mouth is imo
Which would be the same/similar amount we were paying to ACL back in the day, right?CBS rent is somewhere between £1m and £1.4m per annum
Crucially this time it appears we’re getting something in terms of revenueWhich would be the same/similar amount we were paying to ACL back in the day, right?
Likely to happen regardless.
Although Sheaf's value is probably well below what we'd want/need and below what we would have valued him at 6 months ago.
Taking inflation into account, in the current climate especially it’s probably about half of what we were paying then in real terms.Which would be the same/similar amount we were paying to ACL back in the day, right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?