only Grendel could see unification of the Ricoh stadium and ccfc as catastrophic !!!!!
Are you for real?
The greedy filth will set their own rent to new buyers. The club needs to be owned independently and ACL absorbed at no cost.
It's morons like you who bend over and demand more pain from the council who have helped create the mess.
If we were bought by ACL we would be liquidated in 6 months no question.
When I mentioned sell the club on I meant including the stadium. So ACL pick up CCFC, move the stadium ownership (if not the freehold at least the lease) to CCFC and sell it all off as one package. Higgs get their money back, the loan gets paid off, and depending on the buyer, the council gets the regeneration they are looking for.
What are you on about? why am i squirming? i will be getting a season ticket if we stay at the ricoh regardless of who is in charge, though hopefully not SISU or ACL.
You were having a wriggle yourself yesterday no doubt reading your Pro-SISU posts alongside those of VoR.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Err Pro -SISU, you best get your reading glasses changed. Hardly !!
Do you really believe that?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
yes the figures don't lie if city had paid the rent the profits would of been higher
Sisu friendly then.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Oh God!
This is excruciatingly ironic on so many levels.
The anti ACL/CCC brigade are wetting their pants at the thought of ACL becoming owners. Talk about showing their bias!
And now ACL have announced that CCFC can play free of rent next season at the Ricoh, which is proof positive that the auditors were totally correct when signing off on the accounts that ACL can quite happily survive without a football club paying rent. What do the "ACL cannot possibly survive without a football club paying over-the-top rent" doomsayers have to say now?
Add to that their "SISU is the only game in town" stupidity, and the situation of some of the posters on here becomes laughable.
But ACL are charging matchday costs at cost (which can be verified by an independent third party), so they're not making anything out of that and F&B/parking doesn't make them that much.Surviving without the football club paying rent is very different to surviving without the football club. Think about it.
But ACL are charging matchday costs at cost (which can be verified by an independent third party), so they're not making anything out of that and F&B/parking doesn't make them that much.
But ACL are charging matchday costs at cost (which can be verified by an independent third party), so they're not making anything out of that and F&B/parking doesn't make them that much.
Do you have access to information we don't such as management accounts?
That last set of accounts filed were for the financial year ending 31 May 2012.
Nobody knows what the profit was for the financial year just ended, or indeed if they made a profit at all. I suspect they probably did because of the Olympics but it is by no means certain.
Parking alone is worth a couple of hundred thousand a year is it not?
The point that others seem to deliberately sidestepping is the massive contracts that they have with Compass and Ricoh - if either of those companies were to re-evaluate their position, and in the case of Compass that would be a nailed-on certainty, then that could seriously jeopardise ACL's viability. ACL need the club and you'd have to be a fool to think otherwise to be honest.
Still making assumptions. I welcomed the salvation in December 2007 but was very sceptical from the start of a hedge fund and Ray Ranson having control. Within 2 years all of my worst suspicions started to come true with the rhetoric and mistakes from the owners. The cost cutting that sent us down soon followed and then the real bullshit began and here we are today post the one shining light{ Mark Robins} in virtual meltdown as the owners behaviour turned from incompetence to downright destructive and deceitful .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?