Course not. Sphinx are an entirely different club. they were formed in 1946.
But if a daft analogy that, Nick.
Would love to hear of other clubs that went bust and reformed and how their fans felt and feel about their new club and if they still feel it is the same club.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I bet loads do and probably the majority.
What if two were formed. Which one would be ccfc?You suggestion is a bit daft to be honest.
This would be a new club formed out of the ashes of the old club, so a direct and tangible link to the original club and that is entirely different to a club that is already in existence and has existed independently for over 70 years.
Which other clubs have gone bust and reformed. Anyone know of a list?
No it isn’tOnce Coventry City are liquidated they cease to exist. All of their history is gone. That is a fact. It's literally law.
What kind of level do you want? You want the likes of Bristol City on there? How about the likes of Bradford PA? Or you wanting the relatively recent ones?You suggestion is a bit daft to be honest.
This would be a new club formed out of the ashes of the old club, so a direct and tangible link to the original club and that is entirely different to a club that is already in existence and has existed independently for over 70 years.
Which other clubs have gone bust and reformed. Anyone know of a list?
How isn't it?No it isn’t
It can only be perceived from some kind of reality surely?You said it's about fan perception though? If enough fans perceived it then why not?
Again, its about majorities and what people think. If enough decided sphinx was their club then why not? The new club would also be an entirely different club too.
Just would love to hear the opinions of their fans as to whether they consider the new club to still be the club they had always backed and supported.What kind of level do you want? You want the likes of Bristol City on there? How about the likes of Bradford PA? Or you wanting the relatively recent ones?
(Oh, reading this thread this morning shows how 280 characters can alter perception. CJ, in the past you've streamed meetings and that's been great. Is that something you'd be able to do again?)
Read the Newport County example.How isn't it?
It can only be perceived from some kind of reality surely?
Irish is right, it is about opinion. That doesn't mean that officially it is fact.
If City go bust and a new club is formed and called Covent City AFC and plays in sky blue and are nicknamed the Sky Blues and the fans still sing the sky blue song and it has ex players such as Oggy and Dietmar Bruck and Busst and many, many others backing it, then yes, that IS Coventry City for me.
You may not feel the same, but I bet loads would.I
It WOULD be Coventry City to me still.
You didn't even get the name change right.Read the Newport County example.
if people went and supported Sphinx, then fine, but that could never be Coventry City to me.Again, what if all the ex players got behind sphinx and 5000 city fans went to support them? After all the fans and ex players would perceive that sphinx was the new ccfc.
What if there are 2 teams started, which is ccfc?
Yeah. Agree.Sounds like there were some positives from the meeting but I really don't understand why people are discussing a phoenix club while CCFC is still alive?
Bit like your relatives discussing your funeral arrangements when you been told you've got a serious illness but the doctors haven't actually said it's terminal.
if people went and supported Sphinx, then fine, but that could never be Coventry City to me.
if there was no new club I think I could start and back Sphinx, but if there was a new one, then that would be my club.
If two teams started? Well, who knows. We can't second guess now that, that would happen and if it did, who would have the greater right to be accepted as Coventry City?
Cannot possibly comment of a fictional, make believe future concept with no facts, no background, no idea who is who.
Anyway, I think it would be madness for that to happen and God forbid if it ever did. Don't we have enough argument and infighting now without having TWO clubs to fight over in the future!!
tbd I get it as a backstop. The nuance didn't come across if not at the meeting, but for the supporters trust not to have a contingency in place would be poor planning.Sounds like there were some positives from the meeting but I really don't understand why people are discussing a phoenix club while CCFC is still alive?
Bit like your relatives discussing your funeral arrangements when you been told you've got a serious illness but the doctors haven't actually said it's terminal.
Sounds like there were some positives from the meeting but I really don't understand why people are discussing a phoenix club while CCFC is still alive?
Bit like your relatives discussing your funeral arrangements when you been told you've got a serious illness but the doctors haven't actually said it's terminal.
Ah, well that's where you and I differ then.No, sadly I've only got one club. Sphinx could get to the champions League final and play juventus at home and id have the same interest as Leicester being in it.
tbd I get it as a backstop. The nuance didn't come across if not at the meeting, but for the supporters trust not to have a contingency in place would be poor planning.
But it would be to me and many. Why deny us the chance to follow Coventry City if this incarnation isn't about?starting a new club isn't a contingency plan in my eyes.
They are the Coventry city trust, starting a new club is nothing to do with CCFC as far as I'm concerned.
Ah, well that's where you and I differ then.
I support all things Coventry. It's my home town and is my parents home town. I cannot stand speedway, but was always rooting for the Bees when they got to any final of anything.
I always want Sphinx to win even though I have never had any interest in supporting them.
Could be American football, rugby league (which again I don't like), basketball (which again I don't like), darts, snooker, whatever. I always back any Coventry sporting club (but please don't mention anything with Wasps in the name. That doesn't count).
Because it wouldn't be Coventry city. That's the point. It's people following an alternative.But it would be to me and many. Why deny us the chance to follow Coventry City if this incarnation isn't about?
Not a true Coventrian then.I support Coventry city. I couldn't give a shit what sphinx or cov united do.
Totally agree. I am exactly the same.But it would be to me and many. Why deny us the chance to follow Coventry City if this incarnation isn't about?
Probably not, no. Not really arsed.Not a true Coventrian then.
Because it wouldn't be Coventry city.
Of course it's your choice to follow a different team to get a football fix. It just isn't ccfc.Again, not to you. It would be to me!
And you have no right to tell me otherwise. I can respect your decision not to follow thwm at that stage, much as I can respect those for who Northampton meant it was no longer their club. Extend me the same courtesy.
But it would be to me and many. Why deny us the chance to follow Coventry City if this incarnation isn't about?
Seems it was only mentioned fleetingly in the meeting, but for some reason that's what is being picked upon this morning.I'm not denying it to anyone, I can't stop people discussing it or (prematurely) planning for it but I don't get it and it's not for me. Just seems strange that a Sky blue trust meeting should be discussing a different club while the current one is alive and kicking.
I have a sneaking suspicion, (not aiming this at you), that some people are desperate for it to happen because they think there's a chance they'll get a seat on the board which will give them kudos and massage their ego, I may be wrong.
Of course it's your choice to follow a different team to get a football fix. It just isn't ccfc.
.
tbf Twitter gave a different impression, but I'll accept the view from people who were there that it was very much an aside.Seems it was only mentioned fleetingly in the meeting, but for some reason that's what is being picked upon this morning.
The day I get a seat on the board is the day hell freezes overI'm not denying it to anyone, I can't stop people discussing it or (prematurely) planning for it but I don't get it and it's not for me. Just seems strange that a Sky blue trust meeting should be discussing a different club while the current one is alive and kicking.
I have a sneaking suspicion, (not aiming this at you), that some people are desperate for it to happen because they think there's a chance they'll get a seat on the board which will give them kudos and massage their ego, I may be wrong.
Wasn't it discussed right at the start pretty much? Also inferring there might be a deal at the ricoh for one?Seems it was only mentioned fleetingly in the meeting, but for some reason that's what is being picked upon this morning.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?