Classy centre back who should have in the team all season.
Also not buying the itk stuff about him being disruptive.
Nah sorry. Unless disruptive means he was pissed off at not playing, in which case fair play, he was right wasn't he?He was. That's come from more than 1 or 2 people, it's pretty well known
Seemingly knuckled down and shown a better side to himself staying in the team, fair play to him
Nah sorry. Unless disruptive means he was pissed off at not playing, in which case fair play, he was right wasn't he?
Imagine knowing you're a decent CB and watching us piss away goals every week.
I don't think your entire personality can change in the space of a few weeks. The logical conclusion is that he was being mismanaged.Maybe he was just a prick who's grown up a bit.
McFadzean has admitted to being the same when he was younger but turned himself round.
I know they're friendly, perhaps he's mentored him?
.I don't think your entire personality can change in the space of a few weeks. The logical conclusion is that he was being mismanaged.
Also the only 2 CBs we own that I would trust in a back 4. Credit where its due I think Binks and even our mate Joel are ok in a 5, but either in a 4 scares the shite out of me.Him and Thomas are our 2 best defenders .. said it for ages
You also been very down on lati. Got to admit he's a decent player and playing for lampard alot so it can't be down to being robins favourite ?Him and Thomas are our 2 best defenders .. said it for ages
You also been very down on lati. Got to admit he's a decent player and playing for lampard alot so it can't be down to being robins favourite ?
You haven't seen any improvement even recently?I still feel the same about lati
You haven't seen any improvement even recently?
Yeah I know. And I agree. But latis been very good last few monthswe have better CBs
*gamesYeah I know. And I agree. But latis been very good last few months
*games
I think he's been putting in some decent performances since November, (with a few duff ones thrown in).
But if/when we return to 4 at the back, would you trust him centrally in a 2 or at RB?
Don't think I would.
I’ve stated my dislike for this lad & thought his days were numbered at City , but what a transformation he has made to our defence, since coming back in .
A tough cookie & may he continue this good form , with Lampard hopefully making him into a Fadz if possible .
CTID
He's just OK for me , I'd always play thomas and kitching ahead of him in a back 4 ..but I'm not the gaffa
If I could give him some credit it would be that he's definitely good at the dark artsStill stand by that if we can get a couple million for Lati I’d take it
Binks is a strange one , I don't want to pass judgement on him just yet .. he has some very good attributesI think we'll return to the 4 eventually and recruit another CB in the summer and I can't see Lati getting in ahead of the new guy, Thomas and Kitching.
Not sure where that would leave him, or Binks.
Agreed mate, too many Chinese whispers around this place, if he was ‘toxic’ I doubt he’d even make the squad and be offloaded whatever the price received.I’d be interested to see how we’re defining this alleged toxic behaviour?
for example, is bollocking a teammate in the changing room now defined as ‘toxic’?
He seems to genuinely care and is one of those gritty battlers that you want when going to war. He’s proven a lot of people wrong last few weeks.
AgreedStill stand by that if we can get a couple million for Lati I’d take it
Didn't you say 10 million in another thread?Still stand by that if we can get a couple million for Lati I’d take it
Take your point but feel that is a bit unfair on Robins who was second to none in terms of recognising the human side of managementMaybe he’s just more suited to Lampard’s managerial style - seems like an arm over the shoulder kind of guy.
As much as I love Robins, he was known for being a bit of a grump, a straight talker, more in the mould of a no nonsense old style manager - doesn’t suit everyone, staff as well as players.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?