Keogh, Mcpake, Gunnar, Juke, DMC (i assume loans are included), Norwood, Westwood.
Why is it that we talk about the recent signings as Robins' signings, yet previous manager's signings were signed by Thorn even when he was not manager?
Just a guess - but perhaps people think he played a part in them because he was Chief Scout.
Just a guess - but perhaps people think he played a part in them because he was Chief Scout.
Unfortunately G man, you can't re write history. If your market is the loan market and that's where you have to delve into the you have to talent spot from the loan market and you are judged by your selections.
Saying murphy is the only player of any worth that AT has ever signed is just plain silly, sorry.
At times you make some valid points but this is not one if those times.
You name a group of players signed before he became manager and claimed he signed them and I am just plain silly. OK. To be fair there is one interview when he did claim to have strongly pushed the then manager to make a signing of a player he had always admired - David Bell - or Belly as he called him in the interview.
the truth is out there,
for anyone who has our interests at heart,
listen back to the K & G interview, and then proffer questions from that,
whilst listening to skyblueinteractive, heard eakin give a quick dismissive comment in reply to a fan,
we all want to move on from the thorn era, but there are many 'johnny nash' moments,
PUSB
I don't know why I bother but I will.
As a scout he has told us in interviews who he identified to managers to sign.
You deny most of it and re-write history and deny it effectively suggesting he is a liar. Yet no other scout has come forward and disputed what AT has taken credit for so I would say you should accept it.
Then if you are been pedantic and saying you are only talking about people he actually signed......
His first season he signed 3 players, one you like. One is a back up goalie so I think it would be hard to judge him. The other was a striker that you openly admit a lot of people apart from you like.
Then he signs two loan players who do well. That was all he was allowed to do but you say loan players can't count......
Then this season he signs 9 players and states he did the deal for DMC.
He was slowed to spend a reported 100k on a player MR said in the CET is quality.
He has 3 matches with these players and a new manager takes over and you declare the players the worse signings in history.
I would say loan signings do count. If you are forced to make loan signings then you have select the right ones. We have had many average to say the least ones.
I would say
Murphy
Norwood
Nimely
DMC
Fleck
Barton
McDonald's
Are good signings
I would say
Edge.
Jennings
Are ok signings.
I would say Ball, Brown were poor signings.
Malaga I personally think would be in the ok camp if this language issue was not seen as a issue.
I think Kilbane and Elliot should be good signings and the players themselves are a serious let down.
I don't think you can ignore the players he identified as a scout
The interview stops as it gets interesting.
I hope the CET interview him.
Every club has chief scouts in place, but it is always the manager, especially at smaller clubs, who has the final say-and even then the board can block it. The one time the board gave Thorn free rein he totally blew it-yet he still has the audacity to whine about it.
Maybe they were spotted by scouts other from the Chief Scout?
It is bizarre that in the past all previous signings have been attributed to the managers and not the scouts. There must be a lot of scouts in the world who feel a great deal of anger when they see managers getting the praise for signings.
The likes of Barton would have been the focal point of our play
Not sure how long you've been following City, but perhaps you might remember the credit that was frequently given to Ray Clark when he was our scout in Europe?
Or is that an awkward fact that doesn't fit the agenda?
Every club has chief scouts in place, but it is always the manager, especially at smaller clubs, who has the final say-and even then the board can block it. The one time the board gave Thorn free rein he totally blew it-yet he still has the audacity to whine about it.
Free rein? He lost out on his mail target(s) as we were in embargo. What's so free about being able to sign nobody?
Farcical post
He missed out on what, 2 players? He was still allowed to sign nearly 10 for goodness' sake.
Please and a bigger please, can we now stop posting about Thorn. Its OK now and then but this subject has been done to death ten times over.
For the sake of this forum, we have talked about Andy bloody Thorn enough, lets talk about something else and perhaps at the end os the season re-open a Thorn thread for nostalgic reasons, or for those who have really missed posting about him.
We are manged by Mark Robins Now
The Rev
His chosen strike force was Collins and McGoldrick. Neither were delivered.
I don't know what 'free rein' means on your planet; but its a different interpretation from that the rest of us saw. The silliest post since you asserted McGoldrick was a wasted loan. Well done
He missed out on what, 2 players? He was still allowed to sign nearly 10 for goodness' sake.
I could set it on the forum so when somebody types Thorn it changes it to something else so people forget about him?
You still don't understand that the signings aren't as good as we all thought, so they have to have been signed by Waggot!!!! The only one who Thorn signed was DM!! (even though he signed several days after he had been sacked.)
His chosen strike force was Collins and McGoldrick. Neither were delivered.
I don't know what 'free rein' means on your planet; but its a different interpretation from that the rest of us saw. The silliest post since you asserted McGoldrick was a wasted loan. Well done
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?