D
So are we at a point where we need to keep the accused identities' anonymous until after a trial?
I tend to agree. What the hell do you do when the accuser splashes your name all over facebook, however?The answer to this bit should be yes for all crimes, in my opinion.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
You read the article about the local reporter? Simon Gilbert never had it so good than working around here!Don’t know why they couldn’t say she’d been charged
I did yepYou read the article about the local reporter? Simon Gilbert never had it so good than working around here!
Barrow journalist hounded out of Cumbria for reporting court case
Amid a storm of rumours about grooming gangs, Amy Fenton receives scores of threatswww.theguardian.com
Yeah, that's my difficulty - it's the obvious defence by dodgy men isn't it, that they were making it all up, and cases like this just fan the flames. I honestly don't know how to stop someone like this woman though, and the consequence of her actions is wider than just her and these particular men, isn't it.Rape charities say it would serve to reinforce the idea that rape cases are somehow more likely to involve false claims, which isn’t true - I have a lot of sympathy with that view.
Either: She still says they're guilty or;Does anyone understand what the defence solicitor is saying at the end of the piece or is it just badly written
Eleanor Williams sentencing: Men tried to take own lives over rape lies
Eleanor Williams lied to police and posted on Facebook she had been trafficked by an Asian gang.www.bbc.co.uk
Unsure, but lets start with the bit we agree on and let someone more clued up take it from there.I tend to agree. What the hell do you do when the accuser splashes your name all over facebook, however?
I mean... if you *are* guilty, you can't try the victim really without it being in incredibly bad taste but, if they're innocent, you get.. this.
i notice her made it all about "muslim grooming gangs" when a number of the men she accused were whiteWouldn't keep Tommy RObinson anonymous mind you, the shit stirring shyster.
Yeah, it's that despite all evidence showing she lied and made everything up she still carries on the act that it all really happened.Either: She still says they're guilty or;
She still says she's guilty because of the PTSD she suffers because of a childhood trauma.
(I guess!)
Edit: not the latter apparently, as the defence didn't use it in defence.
It seems she might have beaten herself up!Yeah, it's that despite all evidence showing she lied and made everything up she still carries on the act that it all really happened.
Is it a ruse to show she is mentally ill (or more so) or is she really that ill? I hope she gets hope and finds the peace she needs in life.
Yep, definitely looks like this. At least the once in the case of the guy they proved was nowhere near the area when she claimed it happened.It seems she might have beaten herself up!
Where I struggle here is with somebody who has genuinely been advised, screams it out in the platforms available... to then prosecute them for breaking silence seems tough!and proper punishment for those who break this online?
Why? Contempt of court is a crime now and you can see yourself in real trouble for talking about a case if it is deemed to have endangered the trial.Where I struggle here is with somebody who has genuinely been advised, screams it out in the platforms available... to then prosecute them for breaking silence seems tough!
Obviously it doesn't in this particular case, but the same applies of innocent until proven guilty, and is unhelpful to say the least if a lynch mob decides the local reporter is part of a cover up for Muslim grooming gangs!
I guess I just see the reverse, Rochdale, and think it'd be salt in the wound if you then got a conviction for naming your abusers after being ignored.Why? Contempt of court is a crime now and you can see yourself in real trouble for talking about a case if it is deemed to have endangered the trial.
The law's are already there
But naming the defendants doesn't help you get a conviction, in fact it is fuel for a mistrial appeal.I guess I just see the reverse, Rochdale, and think it'd be salt in the wound if you then got a conviction for naming your abusers after being ignored.
But that then opens it up for this woman to cause so much shit!
Must have been wild around there as at the same time this was happening, she was also being banned for drug driving!You read the article about the local reporter? Simon Gilbert never had it so good than working around here!
Barrow journalist hounded out of Cumbria for reporting court case
Amid a storm of rumours about grooming gangs, Amy Fenton receives scores of threatswww.theguardian.com
Those IKEA wardrobes confuse me too tbfEight years - good! Witch! She bought the hammer from B&Q then beat herself up with it
She'll be out after 4 years. Thought she'd have got longer.Eight years - good! Witch! She bought the hammer from B&Q then beat herself up with it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?