skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I think a few people are saying/assuming the same. No different from JR1 in that respect, heads will roll, smoking gun etc.
History repeating, doing/saying the same things expecting different results.
On a trip to Cov end of last year I think I had a taxi driver who was telling me why we were still in the court. Most of it sounded like the usual uninformed stuff you get from taxi drivers down south too. He did say one thing that stuck in my head though. He was confident that parts of the saga were allegedly being left out of the arguments Sisu were presenting to get the case to court. Then when it gets to court and "all" the facts come out they lose. I don't know if there's any truth in that but it would explain the performance of Sisu in court. I should point out that I am not implying that Sisu or their lawyers have done anything wrong. Except that we've been relegated twice moved to Northampton etc. under the ownership of SISU obviously.
I know it's not going to be millions for ccfc, hence I cleared that up with a disclaimer!
That's why I said after all that it would be great if the judge somehow said all money should be for ccfc not them.. They would have to win first. I don't think that's even close to happening, never mind the judge bringing out a massive twist if they did.
As Ive said before sisu need to be in court. The last thing they want is closure in a positive or negative way. Defeat is victory
Pretty much everyone acknowledges this comment I made years ago is true
They want to keep losing to prolong the courtroom stay
I know it's not going to be millions for ccfc, hence I cleared that up with a disclaimer!
That's why I said after all that it would be great if the judge somehow said all money should be for ccfc not them.. They would have to win first. I don't think that's even close to happening, never mind the judge bringing out a massive twist if they did.
Just to confirm, I know it's not going to happen...
Ha ha. Loosing on purpose again. No doubt you'll deny it all again when SISU are sent home packing from court with their tales between their legs and what's left of their "we batter people in court" reputation in tatters.
Tony I would take you more seriously if you could stop saying loosing instead of losing. I also now see its tales between legs.
As I say most acknowledge that battering in court means attrition and not victory.
You are alone on this one. Or is it this won?
Back on ignore but thanks for the laughs.
Attrition was actually promised by Joy, but losing costs money. I think they would prefer at least getting their costs back through a settlement to losing the war of attrition. And of course the other side will now be able to join in the war of attrition by not negotiating and letting the present deal run out.
Which may not hurt SISU in their grand plan, but would drop CCFC in it.
Tony I would take you more seriously if you could stop saying loosing instead of losing. I also now see its tales between legs.
As I say most acknowledge that battering in court means attrition and not victory.
You are alone on this one. Or is it this won?
Back on ignore but thanks for the laughs.
How do you know the court cases cost them anything?
How do you know the court cases cost them anything?
I think SISU are hanging round to see what happens with Wasps' bond repayment. In the meantime they are dragging out the court cases for as long as possible and they don't care less if it hurts CCFC. In fact another relegation probably suits their purpose so they can move us to Nuneaton's ground or something of similar size.
So what do you know as a fact? Is it the same fact you know as when you said SISU lost JR1 on purpose?Well I know for a fact the bond isn't secured and the lease would revert back
So what do you know as a fact? Is it the same fact you know as when you said SISU lost JR1 on purpose?
Looks like you have more trust in CCC and Wasps than I do. How about showing some sort of evidence for once on something you say you know as a fact.
Name one person who is as deluded as yourself and thinks SISU keep up with court cases because they don't want to be awarded a lot of money from somewhere.As Ive said before sisu need to be in court. The last thing they want is closure in a positive or negative way. Defeat is victory
Pretty much everyone acknowledges this comment I made years ago is true
They want to keep losing to prolong the courtroom stay
You don't care how much the club suffers, you don't care what happens to us do you? Not at all so long as, forget it you are just a twat.Well most sensible people acknowledge being in court os more important than not being in court which winning with a minor compensation pay out would swiftly end.
As to the lease reverting back to the original lease that's common knowledge and is in amongst other things the original bond prospectus.
You don't care how much the club suffers, you don't care what happens to us do you? Not at all so long as, forget it you are just a twat.
Hidden in plain sightWhere on earth am I defending it?
Hidden in plain sight
Come on Grendel you revel in it. Bet you creamed when you heard the appeal had been granted.Why then in this thread did I say it's an abuse of the judicial system and should be prevented?
Your agenda against Wasps, Higgs and CCC certainly comes before what is best for CCFC.Where on earth am I defending it?
You are always for it to continue whatever problems it causes for our football club.Why then in this thread did I say it's an abuse of the judicial system and should be prevented?
You are always for it to continue whatever problems it causes for our football club.
Where on earth am I defending it?
Come on Grendel you revel in it. Bet you creamed when you heard the appeal had been granted.
Do have to disagree with you on the last point, no way would I have wanted or want that.More prolonged bullshit from the worst owners in football and some people were 'outraged' at the prospect of smarmy Tim getting his face filled at Chesterfield !! I would have laughed my tits off if someone had spread his nose !
You are about the only one who thinks it is good that legal matters continue. You are sensible?Well most sensible people acknowledge being in court os more important than not being in court which winning with a minor compensation pay out would swiftly end.
As to the lease reverting back to the original lease that's common knowledge and is in amongst other things the original bond prospectus.
Of course SISU want to get a large amount in damages. The problem is that they can't find a solid way of getting any. So they are reduced to trying to find a technicality to win on.According to you sisu aren't trying to deliberately engineer the judicial system to fail, appeal, fail, appeal
That's a figment of my imagination. They wanted it all to end years ago.
Yeah right.
According to you sisu aren't trying to deliberately engineer the judicial system to fail, appeal, fail, appeal
That's a figment of my imagination. They wanted it all to end years ago.
Yeah right.
Of course SISU want to get a large amount in damages. The problem is that they can't find a solid way of getting any. So they are reduced to trying to find a technicality to win on.
If people believed what you say it would be common knowledge that SISU don't want to win damages from anyone and that nobody but CCFC would be interested in the Ricoh arena.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?