In the tweets and replies section?
Nice try.
Spent hours trying to make out grendel supported SISU and still didn't manage it.
and yet here is is giving Joy credit......
I appreciate the context is important, but he's clearly recognising something good SISU have done.
The context of what Grendel asked is important too. He said: "find (a tweet) where I have said a single positive thing about them". Giving someone credit is positive, an affirmation of recognising things needed improving and redressing the balance.
He asked to show a single positive thing he said about them, and there it is in black and white.That isn't supporting SISU, which was the original point.
You also tried this one:
He asked to show a single positive thing he said about them, and there it is in black and white.
The investment thing, yeah, that was a reach.
The post you attached seems sensible enough.and yet here is is giving Joy credit......
I appreciate the context is important, but he's clearly recognising something good SISU have done.
The context of what Grendel asked is important too. He said: "find (a tweet) where I have said a single positive thing about them". Giving someone credit is positive, an affirmation of recognising things needed improving and redressing the balance.
He asked to show a single positive thing he said about them, and there it is in black and white.
The investment thing, yeah, that was a reach.
Nope and again you missed the point made in that, the link I sent and the message the surveys on this thread provide
If only you were doing something positive with your time instead of targeting people on twitter.
If only you were doing something positive with your time instead of targeting people on twitter.
Your confusing me with your mates again
Not at all. You've spent an awful lot of time on twitter engaging with Neil (as has Nick), the new Trust board member. If the Trust really isn't fit for purpose and your intent is to change it, why did you not stand for election or alternatively, set up a different fans group? You've clearly got the time.
Was it meant to be ironic?
Grendel talks a lot of shit but at least he actually bothers with the football (even if that bit is also talking shit).
You keep going on about being consumed, do you really not see the irony in that when you and a handful of other middle aged men with no interest in the football get excited over some emojis of dogs? It's even worse that you don't even realise what they are trying to achieve.
You do realise your pals create accounts purposely to mislead to try and get people worked up at CCFC?
What they do is up to them. Just because I follow them on twitter and occasionally interact with them doesn't mean I endorse everything they do. It'd be like me saying because you follow MKDons on Twitter you support franchising in football.
Again, I am not just talking about people who follow you am I? Do keep up.
Not at all. You've spent an awful lot of time on twitter engaging with Neil (as has Nick), the new Trust board member. If the Trust really isn't fit for purpose and your intent is to change it, why did you not stand for election or alternatively, set up a different fans group? You've clearly got the time.
This is where you act desperate again.
Nobody is saying it is because of who you follow. Please get that into your head rather than just going on about a point that hasn't been said.
It really is simple to understand, don't try to bullshit and twist.
It is as if I have already said it multiple times to make it easy for you.
When I tweet about the position the club is in, I do that from an entirely anti-SISU stance. There are others who feel the same. If you don't like it, don't interact. The fact that one of the people who feels the same works for the Council and was on the Trust board is nothing to do with me; I don't know Tim Kalns, I've never met him and if he's acting in a way you don't like, feel free to do whatever you like about it.
I'm sure there are plenty of people who tweet from an anti-Council stance with emojis, gifs and pictures of Duggins with his Wasps scarf on. I don't seek them out and if they choose to interact with me, I occasionally debate, but often mute or block.
Why should I pay any attention to your thoughts on who I interact with on Twitter?
Neil requested engagement - unfortunately when he was advised the reasons why around 9 out of 10 fans do not think the trust is effective in its role and the reasons he didn’t like it. I put together this thread and surveys which he didn’t want to read.
He like you wants to put his fingers in his ears and chortle about fans who support the club as being sisu fans, Frank and Les and in awe of hedge funds
People like Ginetta and CW and lies Reid are trolls who need exposing as they try and spread an agenda which is to liquidate the club rather than retain it under current ownership
That needs calling out
I'm quite able to separate the fact from the fiction and as I've said before, I've nothing to do with the Trust and agree that it's largely ineffective. My question to you was, why are you not trying something yourself as you clearly have a lot to say on the matter?
It’s like a flat earther has signed up. “I can post what I want” and repeatedly ignoring the evidence put in front of them. I bet his kids aren’t vaccinated.
When I tweet about the position the club is in, I do that from an entirely anti-SISU stance. There are others who feel the same. If you don't like it, don't interact. The fact that one of the people who feels the same works for the Council and was on the Trust board is nothing to do with me; I don't know Tim Kalns, I've never met him and if he's acting in a way you don't like, feel free to do whatever you like about it.
I'm sure there are plenty of people who tweet from an anti-Council stance with emojis, gifs and pictures of Duggins with his Wasps scarf on. I don't seek them out and if they choose to interact with me, I occasionally debate, but often mute or block.
Why should I pay any attention to your thoughts on who I interact with on Twitter?
You are not able to though are you? You were in denial about the council and it’s role in bringing the club down and ensuring sisu came in, you’ve swallowed the crap PWKH puts out, you accepted the bloated rent as acceptable and the nonsense CW was spouting - you swallow fiction very easily
You really want to start all this again? You have gone back and forth with me on this several times, after you deliberately sought me out to argue about it. I'm not going to start again.
Most people do it from a stance of looking at what is in front of them about what they are commenting at the time.
Are you really trying to play the dumb act now about who your pals are and what their agenda is?
I will ask again, why wasn't somebody allowed on the Trust board?
It's like trying to discuss things with a child "why should I pay attention?", you don't have to. The Trust didn't either but even they realised they would end up looking stupid
This continued assertion that they're my 'pals' is tiresome. I don't know these people and their agenda is up to them. As I've said before, I don't care about the trust and I don't know much about their board, past or present. I've never been to a meeting and although I know about the Roger Ellis thing, I genuinely don't know about Kalns and why he's no longer a member.
Back handed complement at best. I give Sisu credit for paying wages and covering losses. Doesn’t mean I think they’ve been excellent ownersand yet here is is giving Joy credit......
I appreciate the context is important, but he's clearly recognising something good SISU have done.
The context of what Grendel asked is important too. He said: "find (a tweet) where I have said a single positive thing about them". Giving someone credit is positive, an affirmation of recognising things needed improving and redressing the balance.
Back handed complement at best. I give Sisu credit for paying wages and covering losses. Doesn’t mean I think they’ve been excellent owners
Maybe you can start by doing a bit of research for the day then?
Do you genuinely think this is a feasible option? The message that people are trying to get across to the Trust is that they don't agree with their approach and that they should be doing 'x'. Sadly they appear to be ignoring this majority.Not at all. You've spent an awful lot of time on twitter engaging with Neil (as has Nick), the new Trust board member. If the Trust really isn't fit for purpose and your intent is to change it, why did you not stand for election or alternatively, set up a different fans group? You've clearly got the time.
This is classic orca - wasps say they are spending £7 million developing the Higgs - clearly it’s bollocks - he bizarrely believed they had £12 million cash and cannot see its all spin and lies
Wasps receive approval to build at Higgs centre
I merely quoted an article where it was stated they had it. Why are you dragging this up? You want to start a 'who told the most lies' argument again.
How are those things even related? And again, for clarity, I don't know Tim Kalns.No I’m exposing how you dribble in the corner and believe everything Tim Kalns has fed you. Even CW now claims he doesn’t know who he is
How are those things even related? And again, for clarity, I don't know Tim Kalns.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?