Just posted exactly that on twitter. One side or the other would have mentioned it at some point in JR1.Surely it would have come out in JR1 wouldn't it. Either as evidence of ccc double dealing or that ccc were being fair
Enjoy the game and the beer. Lots of Skyblue here.
Don't have Twitter. What does your mate Neil have to say for himself today?
Not much just:
My surveys are crap they ask the wrong questions
I need phone numbers and names of everyone surveyed
50% of fans are boycotting
I’m intimate with Sisu
I know Joy personally
Sisu were offered ACL cheap and my sources are 100% accurate unlike your shag pal joy
Not a lot other than that really
The 50% fans boycotting is bollocks - I know at least 5 people who didn’t go because they had Coombe weekender ticketsNot much just:
My surveys are crap they ask the wrong questions
I need phone numbers and names of everyone surveyed
50% of fans are boycotting
I’m intimate with Sisu
I know Joy personally
Sisu were offered ACL cheap and my sources are 100% accurate unlike your shag pal joy
Not a lot other than that really
The 50% fans boycotting is bollocks - I know at least 5 people who didn’t go because they had Coombe weekender tickets
Good pointTo be honest, even if 50 percent are boycotting (for arguments sake), 50 percent are still attending and the trust should be representing their view point as well which was the point of the original argument.
Why put yourself forward for a supporters trust if you don't intend to represent half of the fan base?
Well yes, it's a gigantic waste of time, but I didn't seek out other's views on twitter that I disagreed with, just so I could disagree with them. Apparently Grendel thinks he's some sort of arbiter of truth and goes out of his way to 'hold others to account'. I'm not quite sure why he gets off on that.
I only talk about football with my pals at games
No they didn't. The charity never received anything from sisu. The £1m was a paper figure in the sbs&l accounts only
Didn't seek you out, your hypocrisy just appeared on my timeline.Well done for getting that completely wrong. What I actually said was "Yes, I've been posting about football for years and still do Nick. I just choose not to do it here."
Still true.
Tell me, what's your problem with that?
Thanks for seeking me out on Twitter to try and make a point on here and getting it completely wrong. I guess you'll not have the grace to even acknowledge you've got this wrong.
Didn't seek you out, your hypocrisy just appeared on my timeline.
You happily discuss Coventry City football on a platform made for talking about anything in the world but talking about it on a platform made for discussing Coventry City football is best avoided. Enjoy your echo chamber.
See you're not bothering with this now you've been proven wrong @Liquid GoldI've been on twitter since 2009 and on here for considerably less time. If I 'just appeared on your timeline' as you suggest, why come on here to make a point about it if you weren't trying to score points. I suggest if you're talking about hypocrisy, you might want to look a little closer to home.
But thanks for confirming my original point that you'd be unable to admit you got this wrong. How exactly did I appear on your timeline, do you follow any of the people I've interacted with? What's your twitter id?
Not bothering because I think you've proved yourself too childlike to communicate with. Look at you jumping back in desperate for the argument. You didn't prove anything, you talk about time of membership which means fuck all. Pathetic.See you're not bothering with this now you've been proven wrong @Liquid Gold
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?