AT is pleased with contract talks (1 Viewer)

The CableGuy · May 24, 2012

http://www.ccfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10269~2787602,00.html

I'll be more pleased if both Cranie and Keogh re-sign, especially the latter with Bristol City coming back with a new bid for him:
http://www.bristolcity.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=283105

ccfcway · May 24, 2012

crock of sh1t

more talk of contracts "offered"

dont think i have ever seen a club promote that they are offering contracts as much as we do

Just get it done

kg82 · May 24, 2012

I see clubs stating they've offered such-and-such a player a contract quite often.

ccfcway · May 25, 2012

kg82 said:
I see clubs stating they've offered such-and-such a player a contract quite often.

twice in 2 days ?

Astute · May 25, 2012

kg82 said:
I see clubs stating they've offered such-and-such a player a contract quite often.

But how many of these clubs are NOT allowed to offer contracts to be signed like us?

skybluesteve76 · May 25, 2012

Deja vu or what! Saying that tho, I think they are more likely to stay than anyone we lost last summer. I think they will both stay or both go

shmmeee · May 25, 2012

Astute said:
But how many of these clubs are NOT allowed to offer contracts to be signed like us?

What?

You know the embargo doesn't stop us extending contracts right?

oldskyblue58 · May 25, 2012

Football League rule.....

16.20.3 to refuse any application by that Championship Club to register any Player or any new contract of an existing Player of that Club if the Executive reasonably deems that this is necessary in order to secure that the Championship Club complies with its obligations listed in Regulations 16.19.8(a) to 1

I know it refers to Championship but I think it applies to the Football League in total

standupforcity · May 25, 2012

oldskyblue58 said:
Football League rule.....

16.20.3 to refuse any application by that Championship Club to register any Player or any new contract of an existing Player of that Club if the Executive reasonably deems that this is necessary in order to secure that the Championship Club complies with its obligations listed in Regulations 16.19.8(a) to 1

I know it refers to Championship but I think it applies to the Football League in total

Doesn't matter who it refers to really...let's have it in plain English please!!

Sumo the Micky Quinn · May 25, 2012

standupforcity said:
Doesn't matter who it refers to really...let's have it in plain English please!!

A club (Coventry City) in a Transfer Embargo can not get ANY player to register a contract with the Football League.

When anyone signs a contract extension it usually has something along the line of 'This contract cancels any previous contract' Which means that if a players contract was to finish next year and was to extend it then their new contract cancels the contract they are on NOW. Their new contract would have to agreed with the Football League, BUT under embargo rules this new contract can not be agreed by the Football League.

However it dose not stop the club getting a player to agree a gentlemens agreement - Pre contract agreement.

Pre contract 'Gentleman agreements' were offered last year to: Marlon King, Joe Murpthy & Chris Dunn.

Sbarcher · May 25, 2012

I think Cranie and Keogh are now the barometer for SISU as far as I am concerned. If both start the season with CCFC, then I will give SISU some credit for putting the Team first rather than their "investment". If they go, then we know exactly their intentions. So far, they have been crap owners - this situation will tell me if they can redeem themselves and what their intentions are.
I'm not holding my breath.......

Ashdown · May 25, 2012

If we get a reasonable offer they will be off. Its strange how we should be shouting it from the rooftops about contract offers. I bet there is a few fax and e mails offering them out as well.

Astute · May 25, 2012

Sbarcher said:
I think Cranie and Keogh are now the barometer for SISU as far as I am concerned. If both start the season with CCFC, then I will give SISU some credit for putting the Team first rather than their "investment". If they go, then we know exactly their intentions. So far, they have been crap owners - this situation will tell me if they can redeem themselves and what their intentions are.
I'm not holding my breath.......

Not exactly. If Cranie don't want to stay they can't make him. Differebt matter with Keogh though

Perryccfc · May 25, 2012

Just a thought, we have all slated SISU for letting players contracts run down and leave on a free when the could have got a fee with 12/6 months left, so with Keoghs' situation, saying he rejected the new contract, would you like to see the club sell him or do you think he's that important we keep him at whatever cost and hope he helps us to platform a challenge next season. Personally I think with or without keogh we will struggle to make top half anyway next season. So I would probably opt to sell him now if he declines the new contract...

Grendel · May 25, 2012

We should keep him. We need to offload platt and O'donovan and get 3 strikers and a combative midfielder in. Then we are in with a shout. We will have a good defence at this level.

ccfcway · May 25, 2012

anything less than 1 million and we should keep him

even if we got 1 million, it wouldnt go to the team

so, in short, keep him !

chiefdave · May 25, 2012

Perryccfc said:
Just a thought, we have all slated SISU for letting players contracts run down and leave on a free when the could have got a fee with 12/6 months left, so with Keoghs' situation, saying he rejected the new contract, would you like to see the club sell him or do you think he's that important we keep him at whatever cost and hope he helps us to platform a challenge next season. Personally I think with or without keogh we will struggle to make top half anyway next season. So I would probably opt to sell him now if he declines the new contract...

if you were the suspicious type you could think they've let it be known they're offered him a new contract so that if / when he turns it down they can then say they've got no choice but to sell him. offering him a contract doesn't mean they've offered him what he's worth or what he wants, for all we know they've offered him less than he's on now.

covcity4life · May 25, 2012

cranie/keogh in L1...would set a new clean sheet record!!!!!!

AT is pleased with contract talks (1 Viewer)

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member

ccfcway

Well-Known Member

kg82

Well-Known Member

ccfcway

Well-Known Member

Astute

Well-Known Member

skybluesteve76

New Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director

standupforcity

Well-Known Member

Sumo the Micky Quinn

Well-Known Member

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member

Ashdown

Well-Known Member

Astute

Well-Known Member

Perryccfc

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

ccfcway

Well-Known Member

chiefdave

Well-Known Member

covcity4life

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

AT is pleased with contract talks (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

CCFC Finance Director

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency