Could we have been first if we had played at the Ricoh in front of 27,000 each game? Apparently we are heading for 20k plus again already for the next home game.
Has the combination of our absence from Coventry and Pressley's new young team been the catalyst to end the apathy among Coventry supporters?
Will it really drop to 10k again? Something tells me we will average much higher this term, perhaps averaging 15 to 18k each home game. People have come to realise what they have missed and are more willing and less apathetic in my opinion. Time will tell...
The fact you felt the need to "research" this subject probably suggests something about our fan group.
The fact you felt the need to "research" this subject probably suggests something about our fan group.
The fact you felt the need to "research" this subject probably suggests something about our fan group.
Great season this but look at the average home crowd
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997-98_Coventry_City_F.C._season
Seems entirely sensible to expect 20k a game now :-/
Funny how after people moaning on here I have been looking at the attendances for our league and the championship.
We are 5th in our league having played 2 of those games at sixfields so could have been 2nd if all games had been at the Ricoh playing in front of 10,000 fans
There are also 5 teams in the championship with a worse attendance then us, again with playing all the games at the Ricoh we would have moved up the table 7 places.
So do these figures mean that we are poorly supported or that all leagues bar the premiership are struggling to attract enough customers?
The percentage of fans to ground size is,
67.1 % in the Championship
and 42.2 in league 1
So are we really the only Club with Shit Fans as some on here would make out on here or is there some kind of trend?
Statistically completely flawed logic . You can't take the first Ricoh game and a couple of Sixfields ones as any sort of a true average.
Let's see at Xmas for a true read. Suspect we will still be 2nd. But then we should be shouldn't we?
Why should we be?
Sheff Utd 19,034 average
Bradford 13,589
Preston 11,864
Coventry 10,564
Yes we had two very low attendances but we also had a very high one. And we have those having a go at their fellow supporters because they think we will only get about 10k a game. So if they are right our average attendance so far is close.
Statistically completely flawed logic . You can't take the first Ricoh game and a couple of Sixfields ones as any sort of a true average.
Let's see at Xmas for a true read. Suspect we will still be 2nd. But then we should be shouldn't we?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Depends on whether you're calculating the mean or median average.....we also average only 2,376......so anything over 3k will be a bonus.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
How did you get our average this season at 2,376 when it is 10,564?
The fact you felt the need to "research" this subject probably suggests something about our fan group.
Yes, Go on please tell us what this "probably suggests"?
Go on then Enlighten me?
How do we look if we take average attendances as a percentage of population? I know there are other factors to consider including the locality of other football clubs and whether you include outlying settlements etc, but it gives a more sensible discussion point than simply showing attendances.
We damn well should be one of the biggest supported club's in League 1, isn't Coventry (a one club City don'r forget) the 9th or something biggest city in England?
How do we look if we take average attendances as a percentage of population? I know there are other factors to consider including the locality of other football clubs and whether you include outlying settlements etc, but it gives a more sensible discussion point than simply showing attendances.
We damn well should be one of the biggest supported club's in League 1, isn't Coventry (a one club City don'r forget) the 9th or something biggest city in England?
Pointless. City populations are meaningless if you don't take into account the size of the conurbation. You can argue all like that, say, Coventry is bigger than Nottingham - but it's bollocks. Nottingham is twice the size of Coventry in population terms. Urban area is a much better guide, and ours is smaller than that of Bournemouth. The size of our catchment area is always grossly overstated.
Are you suggresting that a smaller stadium would be more realstic then given our relatively small urban and catchment areas?
I see what you're trying to do there, not falling for it
Are you suggresting that a smaller stadium would be more realstic then given our relatively small urban and catchment areas?
I've just checked the populations of urban areas and it doesn't really give you a better indication, we are 17th. Bournemouth are ahead of us but we have always had better attendances. Sunderland, Derby and Norwich are both below us and Bournemouth and have significantly better attendances.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?