Back Three (1 Viewer)

Liquid Gold · Mar 23, 2022

SkyBlueSam01 said:
Prediction: Sheaf will start next season as the central player in a back 3

Puff puff pass

SkyblueDad · Mar 23, 2022

Just read a whole list of championship players out of contract some good defenders amongst them, need a younger version of McFadz and JCS to sign.
Wouldn’t convert Sheaf but its handy knowing he can fill in if needs be.

stupot07 · Mar 23, 2022

slowpoke said:
Just read a whole list of championship players out of contract some good defenders amongst them, need a younger version of McFadz and JCS to sign.
Wouldn’t convert Sheaf but its handy knowing he can fill in if needs be.

Clarke-Salter is only 24.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

Mucca Mad Boys · Mar 23, 2022

stupot07 said:
Clarke-Salter is only 24.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

I think he meant a younger version of McFadz as well as JCS rather than a younger JCS.

Dimi_Konstantflapalot · Mar 23, 2022

Fingers crossed Rose and/or McFadzean are back after the international break

We’ve looked poor with Sheaf in a makeshift back 3 and should have played a back 4 in the last 2 games really

tommy hutch legend · Mar 23, 2022

slowpoke said:
Just read a whole list of championship players out of contract some good defenders amongst them, need a younger version of McFadz and JCS to sign.
Wouldn’t convert Sheaf but its handy knowing he can fill in if needs be.

fill in he was awfull at the back

PUSB-We_are_going_up · Mar 25, 2022

Dimi_Konstantflapalot said:
Fingers crossed Rose and/or McFadzean are back after the international break

We’ve looked poor with Sheaf in a makeshift back 3 and should have played a back 4 in the last 2 games really

Agreed as soon as JCS went off it was time to bring Maatsen to CAM and play the box with 4 at the back

Bertola · Mar 25, 2022

The box? with 4 at the back? Where was the width going to come from?

PVA · Mar 25, 2022

Bertola said:
The box? with 4 at the back? Where was the width going to come from?

Not saying it would work for us, but 4-2-2-2 is a reasonably common formation

PUSB-We_are_going_up · Mar 25, 2022

Bertola said:
The box? with 4 at the back? Where was the width going to come from?

The attacking midfielders

Liquid Gold · Mar 25, 2022

PVA said:
Not saying it would work for us, but 4-2-2-2 is a reasonably common formation

That 2 behind the two strikers are generally much wider though. You'd waste O'Hare forcing him to play in the channels and on the wing.

shmmeee · Mar 25, 2022

433 or the diamond are the only ones we could do with our squad really.

Back Three (1 Viewer)

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member

Dimi_Konstantflapalot

Well-Known Member

tommy hutch legend

Well-Known Member

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member

Bertola

Well-Known Member

PVA

Well-Known Member

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Back Three (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency