Are you ever going to explain what this is meant to be showing?
It's quite a sophisticated form guide is it not .It's a measure of performance based on results.
It's quite a sophisticated form guide is it not .
Over successive games it evaluates both teams playing strengths.
Becoming more honed/accurate the more matches are played.
A repeat of last season!Expecting a game as dull as dishwater, you’ll set up to press us into mistakes at the back, with a solid defensive shape, they’ll be very few clear cut chances for ether side, as we cancel each other out in the middle of the park, it’ll be the sort of game that’s good to get out of the way early in the season.
0-0 bore draw.
Which players do you think will be given the job of fouling O'Hare?Expecting a game as dull as dishwater, you’ll set up to press us into mistakes at the back, with a solid defensive shape, they’ll be very few clear cut chances for ether side, as we cancel each other out in the middle of the park, it’ll be the sort of game that’s good to get out of the way early in the season.
0-0 bore draw.
Which players do you think will be given the job of fouling O'Hare?
If the ref is anything like the one from the Cov Forest game you need not worry about cards they will all go to usWe’ll share it round to avoid cards for as long as possible.
It's a measure of performance based on results.
the left back position worries me in that line up
A bit like the league table then?
I thought he showed enough against Forest to be worth sticking with. We really need 4/5 players in, I can’t decide if we need two CBs more or one and a LWB. Our squad is paper thin at the back, if we lose Maatsen or one of the back three we’re fucked.
No, the league table is skewed by the quality of teams others have played. This attempts to normalise that and provide a “true” position. If it’s working the league table should match it after the final game.
hard to disagree with this but can see Waghorn starting again based on walker playing full 90 last nightThink I’d start with most of the team than finished against Forest.
Moore
Hyam Fadz Rose
Dabo Hamer Sheaf Maatsen
O’Hare
Walker Györkeres
S: Wilson, Pask, Jones, Howley, Allen, Bright, Waghorn
We desperately need those two loans in. We need more than that but at least those two.
Please just make your own thread
Please just make your own thread
But there is inevitably someone that wants to know what it is, then someone takes the piss, then we get another explanationOr the same people could not shit up every match thread whining about one post.
The usual
Yes, the more matches played the more reliability there is in the ratings.
Trying not to take up this thread with the ins or outs of this but at the end of the season, we have the numbers to do what's in the underneath thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?