He isn't the greatest but I thought on Saturday he was having a half decent game. He dropped some "unbelievable tekkers" to skin a donny player! If that didn't open a black hole to swallow up all of mankind nothing will.
As I and others have said on other threads, on the ball he played quite well, but off it he was shocking. I was convinced he was taken off for tactical reasons, because he was nothing short of a liability when he didn't have the ball, but TM says he had a knock, so we will go with that I think.
Well I suppose its the same as what we said about Burge - he was having a good game, but only by his standards. I thought O'Brien would have been 1st off after nearly getting sent off.
He holds the ball well and I suspect his poor passing is more the positional skills of the players in front of him.
Little lightweight in tackles but does track back.
In a better team he would shine.
To be honest the game changed when he came off.
Difficult to correlate whether it was him or not.
still seems odd that people have a go at him even though Fleck was absolutely awful the whole match, much worse than Barton.
Not saying he's good, but there are worse than him who get regular games.
I don't mind Barton. OK, so he's a bit of a leg dangler, but he still passes the ball brilliantly on occasions. I'd certainly rather have him in the line-up than Thomas or Finch who offer zero to the team.
You could be right, Stu. Maybe I concentrate to much on what he does when he has the ball which generally means he passes it straight to the opposition.
I would say his general pass completion rate is as high if not higher than fleck and Bartons and JOBs but fans seem to notice the ones he gives away a lot more than the others. The gillingham game was a case in point, where he was excellent for the first 60 minutes, then gave way the ball 2-3 times in a couple of minutes - fans then just focused on that pattern of player rather than the other 60 mins.
Fleck was shocking Saturday I would love to know his pass completion percentage?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Yet It was the midfield that failed second half
Yes the goals came from defensive errors but It was wave upon wave
He was taking some awful bolux off a couple behind me after being involved in a great little move down the left breaking down
I guess we just must have someone to hate
To summarise, the midfield is a bit shit.
TM pulled Barton over to him and told him to mark there bloody Right back (22) to stop him shafting Stokes all the time which he did for about 5 minutes and then pissed off back to central midfield. TM had to shove Nouble back to do the job.As I and others have said on other threads, on the ball he played quite well, but off it he was shocking. I was convinced he was taken off for tactical reasons, because he was nothing short of a liability when he didn't have the ball, but TM says he had a knock, so we will go with that I think.
In a decent team he would do well. What I mean by that is a team that plays with wingers so he can spray a pass out wide or a team with two strikers that are constantly making runs. He's a clever footballer with good vision but the rest of the team don't use him properly. Think he'd be good sitting in the middle with one or two by him doing all the running. Leaving him to just knock if around the pitch. Way to casual about everything though
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?