Hes literally played in almost every game he’s been fit you loon. “Not in our starting eleven”
You might have heard of this thing that happens to footballers called an ‘injury’. Look it up if you need more info.He hasn’t been in our starting 11 since 2nd February when we was withdrawn at half time. ‘You Loon’
You might have heard of this thing that happens to footballers called an ‘injury’. Look it up if you need more info.
You might have heard of this thing that happens to footballers called an ‘injury’. Look it up if you need more info.
That injury he got in April?
An injury he got playing for the u23s because he wasn’t starting for us? That injury?
LOL what a surprise he's wrong2 separate injuries.
He came off at half-time vs Forest in Feb because of a hamstring injury, the April one was his hip whilst playing for the U23s.
2 separate injuries.
He came off at half-time vs Forest in Feb because of a hamstring injury, the April one was his hip whilst playing for the U23s.
He was back in the squad after one game following the hamstring injury. I like Sheaf but why are we pretending that the only reason he wasn’t starting was injury when in reality we just preferred James, Kelly and Hamer
Was a bit of both. He wasn't 100% after his injury. In honesty would probably consider it a mediocre season but think there's a decent player in there.
He was misquoted, he actually said Sheaf, “just isn’t near our starting 11”...which is wide of the mark I’d say.I like Sheaf I’m in the minority that is happy he’s signing but to call someone a loon because they said he isn’t in our starting 11 is ridiculous
That injury he got in April?
I can see you've already been put right so I don't need to.An injury he got playing for the u23s because he wasn’t starting for us? That injury?
I can see you've already been put right so I don't need to.
He also played 2nd most minutes of any CM I believe.
I can see you've already been put right so I don't need to.
He also played 2nd most minutes of any CM I believe.
He was misquoted, he actually said Sheaf, “just isn’t near our starting 11”...which is wide of the mark I’d say.
Hes literally played in almost every game he’s been fit you loon. “Not in our starting eleven”
But O'hare had a massive impact last season.He's a talented young player who did well in his first season at this level. Not everyone we sign needs to be immediately stand out. We are buying potential here, pretty much like O'Hare last season.
He's ok, but likes to give the ball away in dangerous positions, and slows the game down too much for my liking, I dont rate him as much as Kelly or James, and I'd sooner put the money towards Liam Walsh's wages, and tbh, I think Eccles will do just as good job as Sheaf given time.
I'm not saying he's a bad player, he's ok, and he's still young and can improve, but 750k could be better spent imho.
True as hamer is young still himself so like sheaf he's not the finished article that's how we can sign players of there ability.Sheaf is a huge upgrade in technical ability than Kelly & £750k (if true) for a young first team player on his way up is nothing in the grand scheme. If you want the finished article, stick another zero on that. Given time I think he'll be excellent for us.
Also, it's funny how the giving ball away in dangerous areas criticism isn't labelled at Hamer. He gave the ball away many times in far more dangerous positions, including inside our own penalty area, but that's just glossed over by many.
Sheaf is a huge upgrade in technical ability than Kelly & £750k (if true) for a young first team player on his way up is nothing in the grand scheme. If you want the finished article, stick another zero on that. Given time I think he'll be excellent for us.
Also, it's funny how the giving ball away in dangerous areas criticism isn't labelled at Hamer. He gave the ball away many times in far more dangerous positions, including inside our own penalty area, but that's just glossed over by many.
Struggling to remember a game sheaf stood out in tbh
Hamer has been criticized for giving the ball away in dodgy areas tbf.Sheaf is a huge upgrade in technical ability than Kelly & £750k (if true) for a young first team player on his way up is nothing in the grand scheme. If you want the finished article, stick another zero on that. Given time I think he'll be excellent for us.
Also, it's funny how the giving ball away in dangerous areas criticism isn't labelled at Hamer. He gave the ball away many times in far more dangerous positions, including inside our own penalty area, but that's just glossed over by many.
That's what I find funny about the criticism against Sheaf.
His critics almost try and claim he was the only player in the team to consistently lose the ball/give it away in dangerous areas.
Hamer has been criticized for giving the ball away in dodgy areas tbf.
But Hamer is also twice the talent of Sheaf and capable of being a match winner on his day.
Out of interest, would you rather buy Sheaf, or drop our interest in him and use some of the money to tempt Liam Walsh?
It's probably one or the other due to our budget restrictions, and 750k being a big fee for us in recent times.Criticised once or twice in a match thread sure but it's not held against him as a stigma like it is with Sheaf.
re: Walsh, why is it one or the other? Especially as they play completely different roles.
You wouldn't play Walsh & Hamer as the double pivot surely?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?