At the end of the day if he is HIV+ no one has mocked him for it, just the opposite in fact. Everyone has posted in a concerned and supportive manner. Well almost everyone. Someone couldn't help but unnecessarily put the boot in and mock his footballing ability which after all are good enough to earn him a wage.
I assume it was meant to be funny as it clearly wasn't clever. Timing is everything in comedy so it failed on that level too as it was immensely ill timed considering it seriousness of what's being discussed.
I never said he has? I said if ? I also said "something like..."
He could have anything.
I was interested to know what's the FA's ruling on HIV+ players? Is there one?
Ah now it was all an experiment right G? That's bollocks, it was a throw away spiteful remark.
Full of shit as usual I see. Or are you saying that it is the first time you have had a go at Bigi or anyone who likes him as a player or person?
I am surprised that you never accused anyone of insinuating that he is homosexual.
No it was deliberate to see the "faux pas" outrage that would have ensued.
It is also worth pointing out that in some media outlets the mystery illness is accompanied by inverted commas. Some journalists are sceptical.
So you thought it was a good idea to have a dig at a player with what looks to be a serious illness just so you could wind people on a forum up? And now saying that some journalists have doubts doesn't make you look any less of a c**t.
Is it your aim in life to wind people up or be the biggest WUM? If so well done.
Didn't he open a hairdressers in the city centre when he was here, or have I completely made that up?
I'm not having a go at the player.
What comments do you think he'd find offensive:
He's got Hiv
He came here when 12 to get free medical treatment for HIV?
He's got Aids
He's got Ebola
He's not a great footballer
You tried to make out that he isn't playing because he is shit and not because of an illness.
No it was deliberate to see the "faux pas" outrage that would have ensued.
.
Why would you even contemplate doing this?
Because I could see after the first two responses this was going down a road I don't approve of.
Horse shit.
Because I could see after the first two responses this was going down a road I don't approve of.
I've amended my post above - comment on that and comment on how when you claimed concern your post just said HIV
Didn't they bring in the blood rule where they have to change their shirt and can't be on the pitch when bleeding etc because of it?
As far as I'm concerned, this is how this played out and I shall say no more about it after this:
The OP speculated (as did the newspaper article from which it came) rightly or wrongly, about the nature of GB's illness.
That thread was not, and obviously still has not been, deleted by the moderator which clearly indicated that he views it (despite his later remarks) as perfectly appropriate for this forum.
I responded to that thread with a suggestion as to a possible reason why a player would not be allowed to play a team sport in Scotland. The possible reasons are clearly very limited and I merely mentioned that one before anybody else. This was not intended to be malicious and I was aware that the thread was intended to express concern for the lad.
You added a post that I thought was a little mean (no more than that) and I expressed that. This, by the way, was nothing to do with disagreeing with any post of yours as I'm sure you will agree that I share many of your views.
Nick decided that discussion of GB's health was every bit as wrong as the remark you had made (despite the fact he had failed to remove it and so tacitly at least, approved of it) and some debate ensued.
Having watched this unfold you decided it would be your interest to claim that it had all been a big experiment and that you had posted deliberately to provoke a reaction, thereby portraying yourself in a favorable light rather than that of someone putting the boot in at an unfortunate moment. Understandable perhaps, but a little cowardly.
Because I could see after the first two responses this was going down a road I don't approve of.
You didn't like people being sympathetic towards someone with an illness? You really are a weirdo.
Cowardly attacks and cowardly backtracking to try and cover up yet another stupid post. Just the Grendel way
So you think claiming he had Ebola was showing sympathy?
And you think that twisting other peoples words will get you out of the hole you keep digging deeper?
So you think claiming he had Ebola was showing sympathy?
Hardly. I have an excellent record on here regarding defending individuals and groups on here when atracked by the bigots on here. You know, like when you sneered about Sinclaire and her balls being removed.
How am I twisting other people's words?
ebola, the jocks have closed the boarder out the infected english
How about showing us where anyone has claimed that he has Ebola?
This is the most stupid thread I have ever seen on here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?