Cant see the logic in that ?You would think he would prefer Rotherham but we will probably offer more money.
Apart from the squad turnover argument - I'd rather have Sharp than Godden in the substitute striker role.
He’s an upgrade on waghornHes a loose cannon could be very disruptive.
I’m not goddens biggest fanIf Godden was to leave I’d honestly rather have that void in attack than Billy Sharp. What a crap signing it’d be.
Sharp, Simms, Godden and that lad from the Dutch league. Happy days
Simms, Yates, Godden and Vente would be ideal. Why bother going for a 37 year old? Much better off in League One.
Tom Cannon’s goals to games ratio is impressiveNah your sights are too low, Simms, Vente, Yates and Godden (with Tom Cannon for good measure just to piss off Sunderland)
Tom Cannon’s goals to games ratio is impressive
Exactly my thoughts on thisIm not sure on this one, unless its a signing with potential to take him on in a coaching role when he retires like a shooting/attacking coach or something
Can’t remember the last time we actually had a forward with a decent aerial threat. That alone as an option, for the last 20 mins, is worth considering.I think most of his recent appearances have been as a late substitute so stats are probably not as bad as they look. Has a bit of a Waghorn feel but I suspect would be considerably more useful. But only if cheap and I would much prefer to keep Godden.
We got a spare £20m?Cameron Archer would be a better signing, permanent or loan.
Just won the u21 Euro Championship with England.
We got a spare £20m?
Isn't that like saying mpabbe would be a better singing?Cameron Archer would be a better signing, permanent or loan.
Just won the u21 Euro Championship with England.
We got a spare £20m?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?