Tommo1993
Well-Known Member
I believe the carriers accepted new terms last week too.
Get off here and get back to work then!
Seriously, well done.
I signed an acceptance agreement today .. I'd imagine it will be mainstream by next week ✊️
He'll be spending his entire pay rise on a razor that can do the job, then.Is that you with the bald head and the grey beard Evo?
Well done to all
It's a very bitter statement from coventry council with many half truths .
Either way , it's over
Didn’t expect any different did you?
The only part of this I’ve disliked in all this is the weird contempt held by *some* loaders.
I can't comment mate as it was yourself that experienced it
See you soon palFair.
I’m sure some will be weirdly seething, but the rest of us are pleased.
P.s. Thanks for your advice.
P.p.s. I’m a week closer to smelling you again.
Fag packet maths, butWonder how many years worth of pay rise they could have paid with the money they've spunked up the wall on Whites?
Congrats Evo. This has gone on so long I can't remember what was asked for in the first place but you've basically got everything you wanted haven't you? So a complete waste of 8 months and a huge amount of taxpayers money.
Any information to quantify your statement?
I am all for an equal days pay for an equal days work but this is going to be a hard sell to the public
The claim is in regards to being paid unworked hours , partly because loaders worked faster to get work done quicker to go home earlier for the same pay.
We can stretch it out
yes, hopefully they can agree something but it's pretty clear the current status quo is not sustainable if they are getting hammered for equal pay claims.Fire and Rehire is despicable - there are other ways to settle the issue.
Yeah that’s what I mean by task vs hours. You aren’t being paid uncorked hours, you’re being paid to complete a job. They should let cleaners do the same if they want but silly to as you say force you to gonslow for fairness or something.
it's not though is it, if they are being paid to work for x hours that is the issue and as I said a hard sell to a public who many of will finish their work tasks but have to stay to the end of the paid dayYeah that’s what I mean by task vs hours. You aren’t being paid uncorked hours, you’re being paid to complete a job. They should let cleaners do the same if they want but silly to as you say force you to gonslow for fairness or something.
it's not though is it, if they are being paid to work for x hours that is the issue and as I said a hard sell to a public who many of will finish their work tasks but have to stay to the end of the paid day
yes but that is not the point I was talking about, it was about selling it to the public and getting them onside when the public are bound by these same rulesYou'd hope one day we move beyond time-based contracts as the reality is that you are really paid to perform tasks:
If you don't work all of your hours but perform all of the tasks, there is no problem
If you do work all of your hours but don't perform all of the tasks, there is a problem
You'd hope one day we move beyond time-based contracts as the reality is that you are really paid to perform tasks:
If you don't work all of your hours but perform all of the tasks, there is no problem
If you do work all of your hours but don't perform all of the tasks, there is a problem
Wouldn't that mean overtime wouldn't be a thing? (in any industry, not just this).
yes but that is not the point I was talking about, it was about selling it to the public and getting them onside when the public are bound by these same rules
Wouldn't that mean overtime wouldn't be a thing? (in any industry, not just this).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?