We don't know what money he'd go for yet. Playing like this the numbers may well be going up, which is an obvious issue with loan players.Agree with all of that, even came close to scoring too. He was accountable for the goal we conceded at QPR in my view but by and large he has basically looked like what we wanted from Kitching but for far less money.
Unless we agreed an option to buy.We don't know what money he'd go for yet. Playing like this the numbers may well be going up, which is an obvious issue with loan players.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
I hope so but no mention so I'll assume not until we hear otherwise.Unless we agreed an option to buy.
Looks a really good player, and probably the reason why Doyle and McNally don't get mentioned any more on here.Just me that thinks he looks the part?
Doesnt get beaten very often, on the floor or in the air, has some pace, great distribution, solid in the tackle and calm on the ball
I really like him. And it makes MR's choice to spunk 4 million on Kitching even more weird. Maybe he didn't think Binks would be as good as he is?
For me our best back 3 when all fit is Lats, Fadz, Binks
numerous times last night he jsut cleared the ball into touch, no fancy feet trying to keep the ball in, just get it out and stop the attack, really goodJust me that thinks he looks the part?
Doesnt get beaten very often, on the floor or in the air, has some pace, great distribution, solid in the tackle and calm on the ball
I really like him. And it makes MR's choice to spunk 4 million on Kitching even more weird. Maybe he didn't think Binks would be as good as he is?
For me our best back 3 when all fit is Lats, Fadz, Binks
numerous times last night he jsut cleared the ball into touch, no fancy feet trying to keep the ball in, just get it out and stop the attack, really good
Could Binks or Kitching play central ? Both look good moving with the ball.
I still fancy Lats long term role will be CDM, Thomas does need to up his game though. Lats at CDM imo could be ideal aswell as good on the ball he covers either of our wing backs.
Jamaica play him out of position !!Do you think repeating things enough times of a forum makes them more likely to happen?
Despite Robins coming out and saying that is not where he intends on playing him (he would in an emergency of course consider it) when sheaf and Eccles are fit does he start above them? No. We will clearly look to fill the other whole in the midfield and it won't be with a CB played out of position.
Jamaica play him out of position !!
I wonder if Gyokeres has had that new contract translated into Swedish so he can understand & sign it now?Do you think repeating things enough times of a forum makes them more likely to happen?
Despite Robins coming out and saying that is not where he intends on playing him (he would in an emergency of course consider it) when sheaf and Eccles are fit does he start above them? No. We will clearly look to fill the other whole in the midfield and it won't be with a CB played out of position.
David Alaba has played number 10 and left wing for Austria. He has probably 400+ appearances as a left back/centre back. He is not a winger/number 10, but in poor international teams, of which Austria and Jamaica are, you play better players in areas of the pitch they can influence, especially if you have more depth in their original position than their proposed position.Jamaica play him out of position !!
What a lot of bollox.David Alaba has played number 10 and left wing for Austria. He has probably 400+ appearances as a left back/centre back. He is not a winger/number 10, but in poor international teams, of which Austria and Jamaica are, you play better players in areas of the pitch they can influence, especially if you have more depth in their original position than their proposed position.
Just me that thinks he looks the part?
Doesnt get beaten very often, on the floor or in the air, has some pace, great distribution, solid in the tackle and calm on the ball
I really like him. And it makes MR's choice to spunk 4 million on Kitching even more weird. Maybe he didn't think Binks would be as good as he is?
For me our best back 3 when all fit is Lats, Fadz, Binks
I still fancy Lats long term role will be CDM, Thomas does need to up his game though. Lats at CDM imo could be ideal aswell as good on the ball he covers either of our wing backs.
He does, not sure why a positive post about one player needs to be an unfounded criticism of another
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I think Lati should be at CDM on Saturday but that is just because of the extent of our injuries. His best position by far is in defence.Has some kind of collective delusion occurred on this forum with this Lati at CDM nonsense?
He’s never played there at club level. And if Robins isn’t playing him there with Sheaf AND Kelly injured he never will.
Wouldn't say its unfounded, We've had Kitching for 6 weeks now after spending a pretty penny on him and he cant get in the side.
Hindsight's a wonderful thing of course but looking back a CM instead of Kitching would have been the signing we should have made
It wasn't an either or thing. Robins has come out multiple times now and said we were trying to get midfielders but they fell through. If we hadn't got Kitching we still wouldn't have got a CMWouldn't say its unfounded, We've had Kitching for 6 weeks now after spending a pretty penny on him and he cant get in the side.
Hindsight's a wonderful thing of course but looking back a CM instead of Kitching would have been the signing we should have made
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?