Because their owners are chucking loads of money at reaching the premier league. I didn't mention stadium ownership as a path to sustainability but a reason that there has been very little credible interest in taking us over.If stadium ownership is the key to a sustainable football club, why do most clubs outside of the Premier League make losses? very few make a profit
old article but illustrates the Championship
Football finance: Championship club-by-club
Surely the keys are better decision making? and a level financial playing field for all?.................... if sustainability is the aim at all
Maybe, maybe not. The best information we have is from before sisu when many potential buyers were put off when ownership of the Ricoh was taken out of the equation.fair enough but i am not sure we can assume there has been no interest other than the Hoffman Consortium. My own take on it is that Seppala simply hasn't wanted to sell whilst her court challenges progressed. Plus other interested parties might prefer to make their approach privately not in the CT. So it might not be because of no stadium ownership
But the point i was trying to make was not specific as such. The whole system appears broken and reliant on people willing to throw money away whether stadiums are owned or not
Tbf the state of the club's finances were so wrecked it was always going to be a nutter or a carpet bagger.Maybe, maybe not. The best information we have is from before sisu when many potential buyers were put off when ownership of the Ricoh was taken out of the equation.
Obviously the whole structure is broken, you'll get no disagreement from me there. The point about ownership specifically came up as to why nobody has rescued us not the overall structure though.
Bolton’s proposed takeover is now off according to a statement from the Club itself.
What a mess.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Surely the winding up order will be lodged?What happens now? Administration?
Already relegated so the points loss should be for next season.
It all sounded very dodgy from a very dodgy characterThe proposed new owner failed to show proof of funds, therefore the deal is off.
Brentford now awarded a one nil win so match will not be played
And to add to Bolton's troubles, they now don't have the income from the game so maybe losing another few hundred grand ?Brentford now awarded a one nil win so match will not be played
And to add to Bolton's troubles, they now don't have the income from the game so maybe losing another few hundred grand ?
Was thinking this today, do they get a goalscorer? Wonder if Harry Kane claimed it?There goes the myth a forfeited game is won 3-0
What Happened to the previous game then? Why was that postponed and this one forefitted?
Why didn’t they just lose like this one?Bolton players refused to play, due to non payment of wages.
Bolton safety advisory group have stopped the rearranged fixture from going ahead.
You'd think so but the EFL seem to have gone off points deductions. Blackpool got away with not getting one so nothing is certain.Will surely start next season with a points deduction. Hinders them re recruitment (lack of cash, plus players more reluctant to sign?) and less likely to go straight back up.
You'd think so but the EFL seem to have gone off points deductions. Blackpool got away with not getting one so nothing is certain.
Will they get an extra points deduction for not playing the Brentford game ?12 points next season.
I used to think of Nigella Lawson as being fit and proper...before her coke snortingProblem is fit and proper is objective. What is Fit and proper?
I suspect that there is no great detail on CCFC because Sisu et al are set up to avoid making available that detail.Interesting article on offshore sports ownership. Both Bolton &CCFC mentioned but no great detail on CCFC
https://www.taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Final-Offshore-Game-Report.pdf
If this was the Sunderland board, 'et al' would be 'anarl'.I suspect that there is no great detail on CCFC because Sisu et al are set up to avoid making available that detail.
Moonshift was set up by the rich former now deceased owner who funded the club through the 'better' times. The charge was registered when as a literal last act he lent Ken Anderson £5m to pay a debt and avoid admin.safe to say the assets are all neatly tied up with Mr Anderson and a British Virgin Islands company called Moonshift Investments Limited with charges registered in September 2018
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?