Why exactly would Rugby boro welcome a new stadium with open arms?
I can't see this option being a realistic, the Alexander Stadium would probably be more viable, but at this moment speculation is all we have..
That's a good shout for a ground share arrangement 7000 covered seats and 12500 capacity. Road network not too bad.
I pass the old greyhound stadium most days there's a hell of ground space there and good road network.
Lythalls lane? Interesting
I can't see this option being a realistic, the Alexander Stadium would probably be more viable, but at this moment speculation is all we have..
You're not talking about the Alexander stadium being the location of a permanent new home are you Rob?! Let me tell you, a stadium for COVENTRY City based in Birmingham would never be viable! Apologies if I've missed something here but the OP was talking about a new ground ;-)
That's Binley/Brandon/Wolston/bretford area!
No fucking way. Move a cow shed round there and you're satan's daughter ffs!
I pass the old greyhound stadium most days there's a hell of ground space there and good road network.
NIMBY. No chance.
I have, as most of us have heard a rumour without substance or do I have any real evidence. This is that the ground that Sisu have earmarked for the new ground is the Brandon Speedway. Obviously I could do without Sisu and I want the Sky Blues playing at the Ricoh but you can see this being true as the owners of the speedway have the site up for sale. Also it's also comes under Rugby Borough Council so they'd welcome them with open arms unlike our Coventry Council. Personally I can't see it happening as the traffic would cause a huge problem.
The thing with the road network is that there is 1 road in and 1 road out isnt there which would be a massive bottleneck?
I pass the old greyhound stadium most days there's a hell of ground space there and good road network.
No no Del I am not.. Yeah I know I made a mistake and hoped no one would notice
I'm not convinced people understand how planning consent works.
Applications can only be turned down for "planning reasons".
Whether 1 or 1 million people say "I don't want it" makes no difference. "I don't want it" is not a planning reason.
I'm not convinced people understand how planning consent works.
Applications can only be turned down for "planning reasons".
Whether 1 or 1 million people say "I don't want it" makes no difference. "I don't want it" is not a planning reason.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?