We're talking on this thread of £3m for Bayliss and 600k for Bright. Do we really think Bayliss is five times as good as Bright?
Its called learning from your mistakesYes because we did that with McNulty didn't we?
We don’t do that mate lol it won’t be hard to replace bayliss he was bang average last season in league 1Its called learning from your mistakes
The actual worth of a player and the worth of a player to his parent club are two very different things and will therefore warrant vastly different price tags. Don't forget that.
Yes, but the point is do WE (ie CCFC) think Bayliss is worth five times more to us than Bright would be?
To be honest if this is correct and that Thomas has just gone for £1.2m I'd be amazed if £3m for Bayliss is accurate, especially as an up front fee. I reckon if any bids come in they'll be half that at best, plus add-ons.
We're talking on this thread of £3m for Bayliss and 600k for Bright. Do we really think Bayliss is five times as good as Bright?
Difference is McNulty was forcing a move whereas Bayliss is happy to stay.Yes because we did that with McNulty didn't we?
It’s a sellers market, Bright isn’t important to Wolves. He has one year left on his deal and Bayliss has 3 years left. I wouldn’t sell Bayliss for a penny less than his reported buy-out clause.
In this context, yes.
Note: I’d rather secure Bright.
Well according to one poster on here who tends to be accurate the one year contract is a million in wages. Why would they opt to lose £400,000?
I thought from reliable sources on here that Bright was now on 20k a week? If that was true, I couldn’t see him being a permenant signing, a loan signing maybe. I can’t see him dropping from 20k a week to what we could pay him.
If he left at the end of the season, they’d lose £1m. As for the figure, £600k is completely made up.
The takeaway from my post is that Bayliss is worth more to us than Bright is to Wolves.
It’s not made up it’s from the best source for inside information we have on this forum - are you questioning it?
It’s not made up it’s from the best source for inside information we have on this forum - are you questioning it?
You are clearly questioning it if you’re doubting why Wolves would let him go for £600k if his contract is worth £1m.
As for myself, I have no idea where the £600k came from.
My reply was about the premise of the thread.
Better days says he’s been offered £20,000 a week to stay. Explain why they’d sign him on a million pound contract to then sell him for £600,000
Better days says he’s been offered £20,000 a week to stay. Explain why they’d sign him on a million pound contract to then sell him for £600,000
Because:
They hadn't extended his contract
Fee received - £0
Wages spent - £0
Net profit - £0
Extend contract and sell before contract starts (likely July)
Fee received £600k
Wages spent £0
Net profit - £600k
As long as they sell him within this or the January window they've made a profit. And if they don't they've still got the chance to have him under contract and get first refusal on another contract after that if they think he's worth persisting with or they do badly in the Prem next year and look like they might go down and thus need him in the Championship the year after.
Not if they don't trigger the extension in his contract or offer him a new one on at least the same money he's on now.
Because:
They hadn't extended his contract
Bags received - £0
Bags spent - £0
Net baggage - £0
Extend contract and sell before contract starts (likely July)
Bags received £600k
Bags spent £0
Net baggage- £600k
Slight alteration for you there.
If we sign bright I’m getting a season ticket as well as my 2 kids
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?