Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Burge is not good enough (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
  • Start date Jul 22, 2015
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #1
I know yesterday was a friendly etc... But some of the mistakes Burge makes is just not good enough. He looks like a nervous wreck and doesn't give confidence to the back line.

To be honest I thought Charles looked more commanding against Boro.

I really think this is a position that needs to be addressed just as much as getting new attacking players in.
 
Last edited: Jul 22, 2015
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #2
If Mowbray thinks it needs addressing i am sure he will, still think he will give Burge half a dozen games to make his mark though.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #3
seems he still has issues with corners, not a good sign.

i have faith in the manager but i do wonder if this might end up being a bigger issue than he expects/hopes it will be
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #4
He has been making the mistakes for months.

Always tries to take on a player, can't kick straight.
 
A

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #5
He's dreadful and should have been bombed out after that appalling lack of discipline against Worcester, which cost the club a place in the next round and potential revenue.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #6
He still is and always has been a big concern for me.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #7
He needs a year in division 4
We need to go after Jo Murphy
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #8
Don't think the Worcester incident was a reason to get rid, remember Johnson missed a penalty too, things happen in football matches, red mist, rush of blood etc,etc.just ability or inability. Scapegoating players for that sort of thing and a manager will lose a dressing room very quick, as Steven Pressley did i believe.
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #9
Yes I think he is a tad inexperienced but remember mowbray said why waste the budget on a new keeper when he feels he has a decent keep but no front line. Sort the front line out first while there is no one and worry about a keeper later and burge is still ok for now. Priorities
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #10
rupert_bear said:
Don't think the Worcester incident was a reason to get rid, remember Johnson missed a penalty too, things happen in football matches, red mist, rush of blood etc,etc.just ability or inability. Scapegoating players for that sort of thing and a manager will lose a dressing room very quick, as Steven Pressley did i believe.
Click to expand...

Missing a penalty is a bit different to Burge's actions though?

I do feel a decent keeper would be nice, would have the defence settle too. The amount of times Burge came out last season and didn't call and got in a muddle with a defender
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #11
I think it's key for the defence to know they have a decent keeper to breath confidence. Last season the defence was rubbish as it was plus they knew they had Burge behind them.
 

Joy Division

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #12
I'm always happy to give the lad a chance, can't say I'm fully convinced yet but hope he's used last season as his chance to learn.
 

Skyblueloyal

Active Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #13
I saw him four times last season and have to agree he a very very average keeper
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #14
Frustrating as Murphy would be easy to get.
 

ms639

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #15
he's utter shite
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #16
Tony Mowbray has said he is okay regarding Leigh Burge but he is hardly likely to come out with "he is crap" is he. Wouldn't surprise me one little bit if new goalie was drafted in at the eleventh hour, seems to be plenty of 30 something experienced keepers about.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #17
AFCCOVENTRY said:
I think it's key for the defence to know they have a decent keeper to breath confidence. Last season the defence was rubbish as it was plus they knew they had Burge behind them.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree with you but that also works the other way around. The other issue we still have is that we are desperately short on attacking prowess. If you're attacking, you're not defending and therefore taking preassure of the defence and the GK. This was our major failing last season IMO, we just couldn't get the ball forward and this was putting us under constant pressure at the back meaning mistakes are going to happen.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #18
AFCCOVENTRY said:
I think it's key for the defence to know they have a decent keeper to breath confidence. Last season the defence was rubbish as it was plus they knew they had Burge behind them.
Click to expand...

Give Ricketts & Vincelot a bit of time to get to know the rest of the squad & vice versa. Then the defence should compensate for any shortcomings Burge has. Meanwhile you can't sideline him permanently if you want him to develop and become an asset.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #19
skybluetony176 said:
I don't disagree with you but that also works the other way around. The other issue we still have is that we are desperately short on attacking prowess. If you're attacking, you're not defending and therefore taking preassure of the defence and the GK. This was our major failing last season IMO, we just couldn't get the ball forward and this was putting us under constant pressure at the back meaning mistakes are going to happen.
Click to expand...

Very true. I think if Burge is number 1 for the season then he is going to have his moments which will cost us points.

I think you need experience in goal unless they're an amazing talent.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #20
From what SW said most of the players were poor and made mistakes last night. Think we need to sign another first 11.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

bringbackrattles

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #21
We do need an experienced keeper without doubt as Burge is still learning his trade and will make errors.All players make mistakes but a keeper has to make less than anywhere else on the pitch,or else you will lose more than you win even with a decent defence.Brian Clough once said you build teams from the back starting with your goalie,and as Mowbray has been in the game long enough he would know he has to sort this out ?
 

WONDERLAMPS

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #22
Been saying it for a while but Charles-Cook > Burge.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #23
FRY-CCFC said:
Been saying it for a while but Charles-Cook > Burge.
Click to expand...

Have only seen him play properly against Nuneaton but wouldn't mind seeing him play more.
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #24
Ashdown said:
He's dreadful and should have been bombed out after that appalling lack of discipline against Worcester, which cost the club a place in the next round and potential revenue.
Click to expand...

Because no player has ever lost his head on the football pitch before have they, and the ones that have have gone on to be sacked by the club......... :thinking about:
 
A

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #25
sw88 said:
Because no player has ever lost his head on the football pitch before have they, and the ones that have have gone on to be sacked by the club......... :thinking about:
Click to expand...

Players with talent can get away with a lot more and be forgiven. I don't think for a minute he is good enough, even at this level.
 
M

malkitccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #26
People will say Mowbray knows better than me but i'm petrified of having Burge in goal starting the season.
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #27
Ashdown said:
Players with talent can get away with a lot more and be forgiven. I don't think for a minute he is good enough, even at this level.
Click to expand...

I agree, just thought the 'should have been bombed out' part was a little extreme
 

Winny the Bish

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #28
Didn't those Pompey commentators say Burge was a Man of the Match contender for us last night? Also there's this from Andy Turner:

"Mowbray has given Lee Burge his vote of confidence and the young goalkeeper looked good in his first run out of the pre-season.He was left badly exposed for both Pompey goals but made a couple of reflex stops and again demonstrated good handling and command of his box as he claimed numerous high balls."
Click to expand...
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #29
He simply isn't good enough; league 2 player at best.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #30
Think I rated Danny Ireland more, and he got injured every time he kicked it.
 
S

SkyBlueSid

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #31
I have never been happy with Burge as first choice. At our level he would be adequate cover but we do need someone who can be relied on consistently.

Burge is a decent shot-stopper but he lacks other qualities. A goalkeeper needs to be well-organised and able to organise his defence and command his area. That will be what gives a defence confidence and I never feel that trust between keeper and defence is there with him. I do accept that our defence isn't the best but players are more likely to make rash decisions if they lack that confidence.

I have never seen Charles-Cook play so cannot offer a comparison. My preferred option would be to replace Burge and move him on, keeping the young lad on the bench as a potential future first choice.
 
C

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #32
GK is the only position where age is a factor,, you don't start off with knowing all or being complete,, you have potential that needs to grow,, you have to learn the craft, GK play to a later age for a reason.. The last thing they learn is patience that effects the decision making, and that only comes from experience and knowledge from playing.. Most Gk dont even mature until they are 28-29 years of age,, so i think its very harsh on a young boy to be throwing under the bus just yet..

I do However agree and have said before, we need a senior GK in the squad, Murphy was slated on here in by some but they would want him back today as you can see the value of experience. He is not and will never be the best but he is and would be one of the best on L1 and someone that would improve the squad right now... Problem is money you pay him it takes that money away from another area that needs strengthening, its a balancing act and one TM probably didnt think would be so restricted.

So we do need a senior, but dont be quick to judge, jump or get on this kids back and that is the same for Harries, Twins, Lawton, Stevenson or Finch they have to step up quicker but already ive seen comments out of depth,, not good enough. These are learning a different level, give them time, more than a pre season friendly at least...
 
Last edited: Jul 22, 2015
H

hamil99

Facebook User
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #33
Didnt Casillias (sorry if spelling is incorrect) play form Real Madrid in goal from the age of 18? Not saying Burge is the same standard but at 21-22 he should be given a chance. Honestly the only people i hear slating him all the time are on here. The manager, coach's and sport pundits/writers all seem to thing he has real potential. I think with the poor protection he has had previously, he was easily exposed and made to look rash and vulnerable. With a proper defense in front of him (im hoping they will all jell together) i think he could do well, a bit of confidence and he could shine. His shot stopping is good, but his commanding of the area needs improvement, surely with confidence and games that will improve.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #34
The thing is with potential and stuff it means not now. Now is when it matters, if he has potential then send him on loan so he makes mistakes for somebody else.
 
H

hamil99

Facebook User
  • Jul 22, 2015
  • #35
Nick said:
The thing is with potential and stuff it means not now. Now is when it matters, if he has potential then send him on loan so he makes mistakes for somebody else.
Click to expand...

I do fully fully agree, but the problem for us is the budget. If we have someone who has potential and we need money spent on other areas where we are severly lacking even potenial, surely the money should be spent there? If Burge has the potential to do the job, then i say give him a chance. The money can then be spent on forwards, who will take pressure off the keeper, as, if you are attacking you are not defending.

Edit: A decent keeper would be at least 2 grand from the weekley budget, in my estimations.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?