Any news on Murphy?
We need to get him game time next season.
Perhaps it is just the usual 'City fan pessimism' but this seems to me to indicate that they don't expect Murphy to stay. A 3 year contract points to Burge being regarded as first choice keeper sooner rather than later.
Hello guys. First post here. I been living away for a while and decided to join. I like many of you guys' attitude toward the goings on and hope I can contribute in a positive way.
I found the fact that Burge has signed, or given the chance to sign a 3 year contract interesting. What does this tell Murphy? I'm sure he hasn't been offered a 3 year deal, or has he?
I believe Lee Burge's contract is 3 years, however at the end if the first season if he has not played 15 games he will be free to leave it if he wishes.
That makes sense to me. .
I find that hard to believe.
Why?
He gets a season to see what the situation is.
If he has broken into the team and plays 15 games he is automatically tied into three years.
If he didn't get 15 games he gets to make a decision next summer, stay in the three year contract or activate the exit clause and try and start his career elsewhere.
We get him signed now in case we can't secure JM.
He has the security of a three contract with the option of going in the summer if it is clear he will never get a chance.
Makes good business sense all round.
It's not often recently I get to say that about SISU
I've already stated my reasons why I don't buy it on another thread.
However your statement highlighted seems odd, as regardless of whether JM signs we still require a back up keeper. If JM doesn't sign, Pressley will bring in another first choice keeper.
And if neither signed then we would bring in 2 keepers in the summer like we did a couple of seasons ago with Dunn and Murphy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I've already stated my reasons why I don't buy it on another thread.
However your statement highlighted seems odd, as regardless of whether JM signs we still require a back up keeper. If JM doesn't sign, Pressley will bring in another first choice keeper.
And if neither signed then we would bring in 2 keepers in the summer like we did a couple of seasons ago with Dunn and Murphy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
The highlighted bit is not strange. He is rated by SP and they don't want to lose him. He will be our number one if JM does not sign IMO. So they wanted to get him signed up.
The highlighted bit is not strange. He is rated by SP and they don't want to lose him. He will be our number one if JM does not sign IMO. So they wanted to get him signed up.
They will not lose him unless he has a better offer financially. John Filan I thought was a good keeper. He played 16 games over 2.5 seasons with us then was first choice somewhere else (Wigan or Blackburn?) I see no reason why we would do this - he should just be grateful for a contract.
JM must be looking around to what is out there in regards to length and wage before deciding if SP offer is right for him. Signing Burge gives SP the time and space he needs to find out if JM signs or to find an alternative senior GK. If not Burge on 3 years indicates the club think he can step up and make the adjustment needed to at least make a % of games next season.
I think this year you may start to hear a few more frustrating comments about the ability to sign senior pro's than the reaction last pre season of SP who was very positive. A lot of the U18's have been training with the first team in the last 2 weeks of the season so expect more to be sitting on the 1st team bench or even playing 1st team footie next year.. Burge will be the first of many stepping up next season me thinks!!
So he's rated by SP and they don't want to lose him.....so what's that got to do with whether JM signs or not?
IMO if JM leaves they will sign a senior keeper as number 1, you don't want a rookie sat behind a defence who conceded 77 league goals. You need some experience.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Stu normally you seem quite switched on.
They rate Burge.
They rate JM even more
They may not be able to afford JM (depending on JM) they don't know yet...
Next option is Burge. Who they are about to lose. However he is great as a number two but is also our next number one (wages wise and ability)
Do I need to explain the rest step by step ......
I do not doubt that they rate Burge and wanted to secure him ASAP, but I don't believe they did it early just in case Murphy doesn't sign as they wanted to keep him regardless of murphy. Of course they rate JM even more, he's our first choice keeper, that's just stating the obvious.
Burge has signed early because he wants to stay and we can afford his wages, unlike JM who will be sought after and will need to weigh up his options and whether he'll take a paycut.
If JM leaves they will bring another keeper in as first choice on a free IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?