clint van damme
Well-Known Member
anyone calling for the club to be liquidated for a start.
Could not of put it better myself. Maybe some might even comprehend what they have done.If I rented a property at an extortionate rate that left me bankrupt twice and the landlord refused to listen to a reduction But told me I could buy it for 40 years and then gave it to some bloke from London for half the price for 250 years I'd feel like suing.
Fook me I do worry about some people on here.
that's not actually true and I deal daily with a company that we are going to court against.
That dispute is in the hands of the respective legal teams and the rest of us carry on with business as usual. It's a quite different situation to be honest but it just shows that companies in dispute still do business.
Lol,Could not of put it better myself. Maybe some might even comprehend what they have done.
Maybe you have to and you or they need the business.
CCC don't. SISU do.
So CCC are wiser doing the minimum that have to.
that's not actually true and I deal daily with a company that we are going to court against.
That dispute is in the hands of the respective legal teams and the rest of us carry on with business as usual. It's a quite different situation to be honest but it just shows that companies in dispute still do business.
My point was that companies in dispute do carry on doing business although they don't have to.
As Tony pointed out in another thread, he think sisu are shooting in the dark trying to find a way out which saves face and I think he's correct.
So I'd rather get round the table with them and see if there's anything can be done to help them on their way.
It doesn't mean CCC have to offer them anything or agree to anything.
It's funny how Jon Sharp is able to make a distinction between CCFC and SISU but some on here cannot...
Anyone can make a distinction about anything if it suits their view point or it will suit them business wise.
Or if it's fact? It's nothing to do with suiting a point of view.
Is it a fact that CCFC are ultimately ran by the owner of SISU. Could Ben Stevenson be sold in the summer without the authorisation of the owner of SISU?
Yep, he could.
Do you really think Tim is brave enough to sanction the sale of one of our better players with out consulting Joy first? I mean she's hurting now. Imagine what she would be like if a player who would arguably be instrumental in a quick return to league one was sold. She'd probably join the Trust, get a ticket to the next forum with TF and stand at the back of the room shouting abuse at him like others who are hurting.
Yep, he could.
Unless of course you go to games to support SISU?
The same way that Cov Rugby, Ticketmaster and Just Sport have agreements with CCFC and not SISU.
In which case fair play to Joy for keeping hold of him and turning down the offers in January!
Doubt she even knows who Stevenson is.
He can't actually as stated by Tim Fisher.
He is an asset on SISU's books so they ultimately have to say yes or no.
You may want to read my last post. As you are starting to look a bit silly.
Well you obviously need enlightening.Can I ask a possibly naïve question? What subjects are they hoping to mediate on? That is, why is there suddenly a need to mediate?
The fact that CCC sold their share in ACL at a knockdown price to Wasps (accepting a lower offer for that part of the business than CCFC had proposed)?
The fact that AEH Trust (let's not they are devoid of any blame in this) sold their share in ACL to Wasps, even though CCFC had offered to buy it?
The fact that CCC have granted permission to develop the AEH Trust's facilities for a training ground for Wasps, thereby making the CCFC Academy homeless?
The fact that CCC have allegedly made numerous attempts to impose planning conditions on development of the BPA that would prevent CCFC from playing there?
The fact that SISU have taken repeated and ongoing legal action against CCC and Wasps to seek recompense for financial losses they perceive they have incurred as a result of illegal use of public funds to support a private enterprise, etc.?
Please enlighten me.
In which case fair play to Joy for keeping hold of him and turning down the offers in January!
Doubt she even knows who Stevenson is.
Indeed. But as has been pointed out is this so he can be sold in the summer transfer window when the income is needed most as there's no other income or was it because she's hurting at the prospect of relegation and want's to give us every chance of survival? You could say fair play either way. But let's not make out that she's not aware and sanctioning decisions at the club. Especially financial ones.
Not ticket science really
Bunch of jokers the solution is simple SISU drop the legal action.
Every Cov fan should be asking for that. Why support something that is harming the club and if won wouldn't benefit the club anyway.
Agree with this bit.
Imagine if they did drop the legals. Wouldn't that then give much more optimism for a successful future for CCFC? and, in a much shorter timescale?
It may not need mediation in that case, and perhaps you might then see an active CCC helping CCFC where they can.
Nick keeps on about blackmail, but wouldn't it be better for CCFC if they did drop it? Much better? Shouldn't he, and others, be backing that?
It would be much better doing it that way rather than call for a mediation that might, or might not, happen or achieve anything
But no, we see a lot of arguments simply ignoring that as an option, and it all has to be about CCC
It does seem at times that some people only care about the future of CCFC if it means that CCC has to do something.
Two games into the season Wasps had taken over the Ricoh and there was no chance of SISU getting it. But you know that. You just happened to ignore or not notice that part.Really? 2 games into the season they suddenly realised nobody was going after a full season and came back?
Two games into the season Wasps had taken over the Ricoh and there was no chance of SISU getting it. But you know that. You just happened to ignore or not notice that part.
My problem is as much when we went back to the likes of Robinson, Richardson, Elliott, McGinnity, Higgs etc. Confidentiality agreements when Richardson left meant we never knew why our club had been run into the ground, and nothing was tested objectively... so all we were left with was rumour and innuendo.Agree with this bit.
Imagine if they did drop the legals. Wouldn't that then give much more optimism for a successful future for CCFC? and, in a much shorter timescale?
It may not need mediation in that case, and perhaps you might then see an active CCC helping CCFC where they can.
Nick keeps on about blackmail, but wouldn't it be better for CCFC if they did drop it? Much better? Shouldn't he, and others, be backing that?
It would be much better doing it that way rather than call for a mediation that might, or might not, happen or achieve anything
But no, we see a lot of arguments simply ignoring that as an option, and it all has to be about CCC
It does seem at times that some people only care about the future of CCFC if it means that CCC has to do something.
LOL. a partnership with a company that "will not deal with SISU".CRFC are already dealing with us, there is already a partnership there.
And yes, I will repeat the blackmailWe'll end up in circles and probably have to agree to differ, but I don't understand why any agreement reached by talking can't then be contingent on legal action being dropped anyway. If a deal were good enough for the club/owners, I bet the legal action'd go away...
LOL. a partnership with a company that "will not deal with SISU".
I was clearly joking, rather than actually saying fair play to her
Who has Jon Sharpe dealt with to get the current agreement at the Butts if he won't deal with SISU?
Lol,
You and Gendall must be extremely gullable and stupid to believe that a championship club who had an average gate of 20,000 fans could go bust twice just because of a £1.2million annual rent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?