I'm afraid not, I doubt any club would give all the details out. I think the 10% of sell on profit has been confirmed, but that's all.Any suggestion as to what the add on's were?
Pretty sure the accounts showed he was sold for £2m (before add ons).
I'm afraid not, I doubt any club would give all the details out. I think the 10% of sell on profit has been confirmed, but that's all.
If Bournemouth do sell two players to a club I wonder if they can just down value Wilson and increase the value on the other player to get around paying us 10%.
I don't think Arsenal gave Southampton a bonus just because they got promoted. If anything gives Southampton more leverage it's their reputation in the transfer market for acquiring top dollar when selling. Us on the other hand have a reputation of letting contracts run down and losing them for free or taking the first offer that comes along.
In that case why didn't arsenal buy Wilson - you clearly know more than any premier league scout, coach or manager. At such a knock down fee still no one was interested were they?
No I don't know more than premier league scout, manager or coach. I do know more than the ones on here who was saying he was a one season wonder and it was a good price. He clearly wasn't and it clearly wasn't.
As for no one being interested at a knock down fee. It sounds like you're advocating the sale of the Ricoh at a knock down price as no one else was interested...
...no, thought not. Yet it's the same principle.
No as that's an upfront payment. All fees are paid over time.
Tou
You've failed to answer the question and as usual gone on a juvenile rant.
Why didn't any premier league club think he was worth it? Are they wrong?
You never saw him play did you?
Probably the same reason no premier club thought Vardy was good enough. Were they right?
If a bidding war breaks out for Wilson and there's plenty of talk to suggest there might be then yes they initially missed the boat.
As I boycotted Sixfields no I didn't get to see him play. Saw him on highlights only and there was plenty of them.
He clearly wasn't a one season wonder, he was clearly going to tear the championship a new A hole and based on that he was clearly going to step up to life in the premier league. He hit the ground running including scoring the first hat trick of the premier league season. None of which came as a surprise to me while others were claiming he was a one season wonder in league one who wouldn't cut it in the championship and then wouldn't cut it in the premier league.
The sale value will be recorded in the year they are sold, regardless of when the cash comes in. It would only be when an add on gets triggered and becomes payable that you'd record that amount.No transfer fees are all paid in season one. Clubs pay over a number of years the agreed fee. We have paid a reasonable fee for Jones but the fee will be staggered over the duration of the contract.
The sale value will be recorded in the year they are sold, regardless of when the cash comes in. It would only be when an add on gets triggered and becomes payable that you'd record that amount.
What happens if the add on never happened? You would be paying tax on something that never happened?The sale value will be recorded in the year they are sold, regardless of when the cash comes in. It would only be when an add on gets triggered and becomes payable that you'd record that amount.
You don't put the add on in the Accounts until it happens (I did say that)What happens if the add on never happened? You would be paying tax on something that never happened?
You'd write it off as a bad debt, and hope you've got some other security in place.In the accounts I can't see how that's possible. What if the purchasing club folded?
Ah, it's early. I'm going back to sleep!You don't put the add on in the Accounts until it happens (I did say that)
I think that's very unlikely and would surely have to show as a creditor on a balance sheet. Also it would make it very easy to work out the undisclosed fees.You'd write it off as a bad debt, and hope you've got some other security in place.
Having watched Wilson at Old Trafford last night I wouldn't hold my breath for a massive windfall. I thought he was poor, first touch often dreadful. That said, Bournemouth were poor all round and United are strong defensively.
Tommy has pretty much said it all, but to expand on the contingent asset part, the 2015 accounts said we could potentially receive up to £615k depending on whether the player (not named, but player rather than players so must only be Wilson) and their club attain certain objectives. Those objectives hadn't been met by 31.5.15 so the amounts weren't included in the accounts.I think that's very unlikely and would surely have to show as a creditor on a balance sheet. Also it would make it very easy to work out the undisclosed fees.
Do you know this as a fact?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?