Unfortunately he couldn't stay his home, because he's a stubborn bastard, who believes he can walk and he can't. He kept falling over and wouldn't wait for the carers.Legally a person is permitted to give £3000 per annum without any tax implications. Whether this would be deprivation of assets is the question.
Our concern is that our MIL has saved diligently, has a modest flat in a sheltered housing setting. Also has a cash lump sum saved.
It’s ridiculous that a person who has saved all their lives and has a home should pay. Paid taxes all their lives, only to see their assets disappear. The flip side is that we want people to receive a good standard of care, so they will pay for it.
I guess your dad has had a social care provision assessment? He may be able to stay in his home with 4 visits a day? A damn sight cheaper as its £1k plus/week for many care homes. I guess that’s happening already?
Your dad will of course pay a contribution to food/heating etc. in a care home.
Small amount is not means tested in the care home. Personal Spending of about £26/week for toiletries, hairdresser etc.
Deprivation of assets is the problem. The L.A. will likely put a charge on the estate/house.
Found this. It may help.
Good luck, Daz.One of the reasons we are moving home is to convince my parents to come and live with us as they fear the thought of moving into a care home Dad has dementia but is happy with the idea but mum is a strong willed stubborn Irish woman and in all honesty in total denial about her having dementia , we have had an offer on property accepted . It has a double garage out the back which I plan to knock down and turn into a self contained flat for them so they still maintain a bit of independence, its going to take time and its going to be a struggle but it will be worth it in the end
Cheers Otis, going to be a long process but we will get thereGood luck, Daz.
Are you up to speed. On carers/attendance allowance?One of the reasons we are moving home is to convince my parents to come and live with us as they fear the thought of moving into a care home Dad has dementia but is happy with the idea but mum is a strong willed stubborn Irish woman and in all honesty in total denial about her having dementia , we have had an offer on property accepted . It has a double garage out the back which I plan to knock down and turn into a self contained flat for them so they still maintain a bit of independence, its going to take time and its going to be a struggle but it will be worth it in the end
Got to ask the practical question. Planning permission not going to be an issue doing that?, we have had an offer on property accepted . It has a double garage out the back which I plan to knock down and turn into a self contained flat for them so they still maintain a bit of independence, its going to take time and its going to be a struggle but it will be worth it in the end
Been in contact with Age concern and Admiral nursesAre you up to speed. On carers/attendance allowance?
I'm lead to believe that the people we are buying from had original plans to have an extension from the house onto the garage a few years ago, so hopefully it wont be an issueGot to ask the practical question. Planning permission not going to be an issue doing that?
You need to check what those plans were for, and if they got approvalI'm lead to believe that the people we are buying from had original plans to have an extension from the house onto the garage a few years ago, so hopefully it wont be an issue
I'd be amazed if that got queried. Think they're more after people giving away thousands, hundred quid here and there isn't going to make much difference to where you are on the scaleHe just wants to know is he going to be queried if he says wants to give someone £500 towards a new car, or for driving lessons etc?
He just gave £100 to my daughter for her uni first year.
The rules seem very vague and confusing.
The standard of care unfortunately isn't a direct correlation to the price paid and many private homes are about profits. The quality of carer is much more important and they can be good bad or indifferent whether private or state owned. We pay so much tax on everything already to try and save so that our estate can be passed on. My parents have for me and I hope to for my daughter. The rules simply need changing, not to millions but at least to the price of an average family home can be left.
Would be less of an issue if housing to wages was much more affordable.Tying care to housing costs is just fundamentally unfair to me. Just come from a thread about how everyone is waiting for their parents to die to pass down this massive unearned wealth, and here we are saying it’ll all be taken to pay for their care anyway.
Is it really too much to ask that everyone gets good care and people can pass a legacy on to their kids?
Would be less of an issue if housing to wages was much more affordable.
If you have a way of passing your wealth on without it being termed ‘deprivation of assets’ I’d be interested to know.The standard of care unfortunately isn't a direct correlation to the price paid and many private homes are about profits. The quality of carer is much more important and they can be good bad or indifferent whether private or state owned. We pay so much tax on everything already to try and save so that our estate can be passed on. My parents have for me and I hope to for my daughter. The rules simply need changing, not to millions but at least to the price of an average family home can be left.
The govts. Have no intention of doing this. Look at the lapsed threshold changes which were to be introduced.The standard of care unfortunately isn't a direct correlation to the price paid and many private homes are about profits. The quality of carer is much more important and they can be good bad or indifferent whether private or state owned. We pay so much tax on everything already to try and save so that our estate can be passed on. My parents have for me and I hope to for my daughter. The rules simply need changing, not to millions but at least to the price of an average family home can be left.
Nobody has a right to inherit money not earned by them howeverTying care to housing costs is just fundamentally unfair to me. Just come from a thread about how everyone is waiting for their parents to die to pass down this massive unearned wealth, and here we are saying it’ll all be taken to pay for their care anyway.
Is it really too much to ask that everyone gets good care and people can pass a legacy on to their kids?
However having seen this, I moderate my previous replyWould be less of an issue if housing to wages was much more affordable.
Nobody has a right to inherit money not earned by them however
As adults, we should have a right to give our wealth to whoever we want to. Not to be syphoned off by local authorities.Nobody has a right to inherit money not earned by them however
It’s possible, it just takes planning, plenty of time before you need care and most people don’t do that or brave enough to pass down, put in trust or give away.As adults, we should have a right to give our wealth to whoever we want to. Not to be syphoned off by local authorities.
The stats are generally in favour of those who inherit anyway. Due to people having died out of the care system. But this is becoming less so due to people living longer with illness.
Apologies to Otis for hijacking his thread but does anyone have experience with getting a lawyer involved in funding issues. Long story short my Dad is nearly 20 months in to having 6 months maximum left and they've suddenly decided they're taking his funding away with only a couple of weeks notice.
The system is so confusing but from what I can make out they haven't followed the correct process but its near impossible to get hold of anyone or get a reply to anything so thinking it might be worth spending a few quid on a lawyer that knows the system.
Have my suspicions that they're just cutting funding across the board as there's no money and working on the basis most people aren't going to challenge it because they're dealing with a loved one at the end of the life.
yes please mate, that would be very usefulI believe my family has just instructed someone along vaguely similar lines. I’ll try and get the details if you want?
I agree to a point.As adults, we should have a right to give our wealth to whoever we want to. Not to be syphoned off by local authorities.
The stats are generally in favour of those who inherit anyway. Due to people having died out of the care system. But this is becoming less so due to people living longer with illness.
500K is a lot of money. That is about 10 years worth of care. There’s a fair chance there would be a bob or two left for inheritors without the 500k bottom limit. That’s where the system fails. Many start with far less and there is little to pass on/ the state picks up the tab earlier. The real hope is that all the elderly receive appropriate levels of care…thus overriding the intention of passing money . My MIL has dementia, they’d have loved to leave a nest egg and thinks she will be doing so, but our priority is her care.I agree to a point.
You should be able to leave your family with a roof over their head and food on the table. But when it gets into vast fortunes I disagree - no-one should be given that amount of wealth and privilege just because of who they're related to.
Trouble is the current system is clearly designed to favour those with vast fortunes to pass down by limiting the amount people pay towards care costs. Those with modest assets can lose it all while those who could pay but not really feel the pinch get to keep loads.
It should be limited by the amount of assets. You can pass on £x amount (say £500k) and anything above this is used towards care costs. Admittedly it's not perfect, but it's fairer than the current system and more of a basis to start from.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?