Even if league games had been scheduled to be away there would still be a home cup game to be played tonight.If City knew about this, then they took a risk knowing that it may end in tears. The planning around The Commonwealth Games was in place to the point of having the stadium booked for an extra week.
To be honest, I think Grendel is an equal opportunities pain in the arse on both sites.Someone mentioned you on one of their forums - said something about typing with a frontal lobotomy - shocking behaviour
I’m afraid Wasps don’t care about the pitch and whether it’s fit for us to use , they have 35 million bigger problems at the momentEven if league games had been scheduled to be away there would still be a home cup game to be played tonight.
For me there are questions around the maintenance of the pitch and the state it was in prior to the CWG. If they knew a new pitch wasn't going in then getting the existing one right was an important task that seems to have been neglected.
Secondly if Wasps felt the pitch would not be playable why did they agree to the clubs demands for a game, just tell Boddy its not possible and that if the EFL have an issue with that they were happy to speak with them directly. At some point Wasps agreed to stage a home game therefore they have a responsibility to ensure there's a pitch fit for purpose.
There are no repercussions for the Wasps apart from the club refusing to pay the rent and then having to play elsewhere , which they know the club cannot do
I’m afraid Wasps don’t care about the pitch and whether it’s fit for us to use , they have 35 million bigger problems at the momentEven if league games had been scheduled to be away there would still be a home cup game to be played tonight.
For me there are questions around the maintenance of the pitch and the state it was in prior to the CWG. If they knew a new pitch wasn't going in then getting the existing one right was an important task that seems to have been neglected.
Secondly if Wasps felt the pitch would not be playable why did they agree to the clubs demands for a game, just tell Boddy its not possible and that if the EFL have an issue with that they were happy to speak with them directly. At some point Wasps agreed to stage a home game therefore they have a responsibility to ensure there's a pitch fit for purpose.
Well we cant pay them for not providing w suitable pitch, we surely cant pay them for having to play a home game in BurtonI’m afraid Wasps don’t care about the pitch and whether it’s fit for us to use , they have 35 million bigger problems at the moment
They just want receive the rent we pay and that’s it
The EFL have no control or able to sanction them
There are no repercussions for the Wasps apart from the club refusing to pay the rent and then having to play elsewhere , which they know the club cannot do
There are no repercussions for the Wasps apart from the club refusing to pay the rent and then having to play elsewhere , which they know the club cannot do
I’m afraid Wasps don’t care about the pitch and whether it’s fit for us to use , they have 35 million bigger problems at the moment
They just want receive the rent we pay and that’s it
The EFL have no control or able to sanction them
There are no repercussions for the Wasps apart from the club refusing to pay the rent and then having to play elsewhere , which they know the club cannot do
I’m afraid Wasps don’t care about the pitch and whether it’s fit for us to use , they have 35 million bigger problems at the moment
They just want receive the rent we pay and that’s it
The EFL have no control or able to sanction them
There are no repercussions for the Wasps apart from the club refusing to pay the rent and then having to play elsewhere , which they know the club cannot do
We are the least of their problems at the moment and they have no money to fix in the long termThey will if there's no pitch to play on.
They won't be getting rent if the pitch isn't fit for use. Why would / should they?
Even if league games had been scheduled to be away there would still be a home cup game to be played tonight.
For me there are questions around the maintenance of the pitch and the state it was in prior to the CWG. If they knew a new pitch wasn't going in then getting the existing one right was an important task that seems to have been neglected.
Secondly if Wasps felt the pitch would not be playable why did they agree to the clubs demands for a game, just tell Boddy its not possible and that if the EFL have an issue with that they were happy to speak with them directly. At some point Wasps agreed to stage a home game therefore they have a responsibility to ensure there's a pitch fit for purpose.
Pretty sure The Casino, bars etc will have something to say about the lack of income for cancelled matches - if Wasps really are 'we don't give a **** about CCFC, and the wider community for that matter - pubs, cafes etc - nor the condition of the pitch (notwithstanding any 'contract' conditions that may exist) then they are setting themselves up for an even quicker fall as regards community engagement. This may well be because they are in a desperate financial state - if so, let the good people of Coventry react appropriately; I know most City fans will. We really need to get the CET to get off the fence on this one and focus the spotlight on what is happening here.
Did Boddy venture that it was EFL's end of things?The whole thing is bizarre and we're going to get the usual sets of PR spin from both sides to cloud the situation further I expect. It smacks of a poor working relationship between the club and Wasps but also of some potentially bizarre decision making along the way (for example if as Wasps say we knew the pitch would likely be wrecked and unplayable why did we not press the EFL to move the game). Being informed in May that a new pitch was not going to be installed and raising no objections also seems odd on our part (or complete BS from Wasps). Fans are once again stuck in the middle of this farce.
As seen previously, Duggins etc don't give a fuck about the local businesses who will also lose out. He was more bothered about an Aldi closing (when there's one up the road) than he was CCFC moving.
Fuck all of the businesses who will now lose out on money tonight alone.
I’ve never met your family but based on my little knowledge of you I’d be gutted tooI've got to spend the day with my family, fucking gutted!
We are the least of their problems at the moment and they have no money to fix in the long term
They will use this time to continue what they have always done and hopefully the pitch will pass an inspection
I think even the dumb council will be careful about big positive narratives over wasps now - there’s clearly big financial issues and a major embarrassment coming closer
If the pitch isn't brought up to standard then I can't really see any other route other than the club withholding rent - as one can pretty easily assume that Wasps won't be forthcoming with any compensation which
What can they say ?Pretty sure The Casino, bars etc will have something to say about the lack of income for cancelled matches - if Wasps really are 'we don't give a **** about CCFC, and the wider community for that matter - pubs, cafes etc - nor the condition of the pitch (notwithstanding any 'contract' conditions that may exist) then they are setting themselves up for an even quicker fall as regards community engagement. This may well be because they are in a desperate financial state - if so, let the good people of Coventry react appropriately; I know most City fans will. We really need to get the CET to get off the fence on this one and focus the spotlight on what is happening here.
What can they say ?
The council have not said a word , while the wasps hide behind them
We are the least of their problems at the moment and they have no money to fix in the long term
They will use this time to continue what they have always done and hopefully the pitch will pass an inspection
Can anyone help me? I only had two lager tops all day because the queues were so bad. Nipped off the boat for a quick slash in the hedge while we were waiting in a lock but got my Prince Albert stuck in my zip. By the time I'd freed myself the boat was nowhere to be seen. Just heard an elephant, so think I'm somewhere near Twycross zoo if anyone is driving that way to the game....If the coach is too expensive, James Raffell has just announced he’s doing a 10 quid all you can drink barge trip, leaving the canal basin at 8am tomorrow.
From bondholders forumWe are the least of their problems at the moment and they have no money to fix in the long term
They will use this time to continue what they have always done and hopefully the pitch will pass an inspection
| ||
laurence.griffiths@usbank.com cc. CDRM@usbank.com cc. chris.hobbs@usbank.com US Bank Trustees Limited (in its capacity as Issuer Security Trustee) 125 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1AR Actually as it turns out, we may all need to go through our brokers as most of us are actually 'beneficial owners' and not legal owners. Our bonds are held for us in trust by the broker. Just to be clear, Wasps Finance and Wasps Hodings are insolvent, we know this because they have defaulted on the bond. The consent solicitation is a CVA (Company voluntary arrangements) whereby an insolvent company seeks to reach an agreement with its creditors to prevent itslef having to go into liquidation. As we know, it requires 75% of bondholders to agree to any arrangement. We all need to get in contact with our brokers and make sure they keep us informed and know our wishes. Personally, unless they come up with a very convincing plan for repayment in a fairly short space of time, I am for selling the arena/liquidation. The amount of money they have lost, since well before the pandemic is astonishing. They also have added a further 20 million loan from Derek Richardson and sold a stake (what stake?) to CVC for 12.5 million. It's all vanished, there's nothing left. Except the stadium, whatever that's worth. Wasp Bondholders Facebook Group: https://www.-1358371174688144 |
https://giphy.com/l0HlMG1EX2H38cZeEFrom bondholders forum
We should all get together and foreclose - Anyone have the contact details of the Bond Trustee
coley88
10 Aug '22 - 14:05 - 791 of 792 0 0 0
Laurence Griffiths
bigfish1
10 Aug '22 - 16:05 - 792 of 792 0 0 0
laurence.griffiths@usbank.com
cc. CDRM@usbank.com
cc. chris.hobbs@usbank.com
US Bank Trustees Limited (in its capacity as Issuer Security Trustee) 125 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1AR
Actually as it turns out, we may all need to go through our brokers as most of us are actually 'beneficial owners' and not legal owners. Our bonds are held for us in trust by the broker.
Just to be clear, Wasps Finance and Wasps Hodings are insolvent, we know this because they have defaulted on the bond. The consent solicitation is a CVA (Company voluntary arrangements) whereby an insolvent company seeks to reach an agreement with its creditors to prevent itslef having to go into liquidation. As we know, it requires 75% of bondholders to agree to any arrangement. We all need to get in contact with our brokers and make sure they keep us informed and know our wishes. Personally, unless they come up with a very convincing plan for repayment in a fairly short space of time, I am for selling the arena/liquidation. The amount of money they have lost, since well before the pandemic is astonishing. They also have added a further 20 million loan from Derek Richardson and sold a stake (what stake?) to CVC for 12.5 million. It's all vanished, there's nothing left. Except the stadium, whatever that's worth.
Wasp Bondholders Facebook Group: https://www.-1358371174688144
This is a very interesting and it usually on takes on significant bond holder to decide to cut their loses and seek to recover some value for contagion within other financial institutions to take grip. So …. How much do they think the stadium is worth?From bondholders forum
We should all get together and foreclose - Anyone have the contact details of the Bond Trustee
coley88
10 Aug '22 - 14:05 - 791 of 792 0 0 0
Laurence Griffiths
bigfish1
10 Aug '22 - 16:05 - 792 of 792 0 0 0
laurence.griffiths@usbank.com
cc. CDRM@usbank.com
cc. chris.hobbs@usbank.com
US Bank Trustees Limited (in its capacity as Issuer Security Trustee) 125 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1AR
Actually as it turns out, we may all need to go through our brokers as most of us are actually 'beneficial owners' and not legal owners. Our bonds are held for us in trust by the broker.
Just to be clear, Wasps Finance and Wasps Hodings are insolvent, we know this because they have defaulted on the bond. The consent solicitation is a CVA (Company voluntary arrangements) whereby an insolvent company seeks to reach an agreement with its creditors to prevent itslef having to go into liquidation. As we know, it requires 75% of bondholders to agree to any arrangement. We all need to get in contact with our brokers and make sure they keep us informed and know our wishes. Personally, unless they come up with a very convincing plan for repayment in a fairly short space of time, I am for selling the arena/liquidation. The amount of money they have lost, since well before the pandemic is astonishing. They also have added a further 20 million loan from Derek Richardson and sold a stake (what stake?) to CVC for 12.5 million. It's all vanished, there's nothing left. Except the stadium, whatever that's worth.
Wasp Bondholders Facebook Group: https://www.-1358371174688144
Not heard any solutions from any party other than thoughts and prayers. CrazyThis is a very interesting and it usually on takes on significant bond holder to decide to cut their loses and seek to recover some value for contagion within other financial institutions to take grip. So …. How much do they think the stadium is worth?
I don’t think it matters what is in the contract , wasps have no money to rectify the pitch , do any improvements , investment in a new pitchDo you know if there was any caveat/condition in the return agreement that payments would be based on a suitable playing surface or something of that ilk?
If we've signed a deal but there's no mention of a good standard of pitch being available (and ability for non-rent payment if not), that wouldn't be the smartest thing we've ever done.
Hopefully we've not dropped the ball on it.
Do you know if there was any caveat/condition in the return agreement that payments would be based on a suitable playing surface or something of that ilk?
If we've signed a deal but there's no mention of a good standard of pitch being available (and ability for non-rent payment if not), that wouldn't be the smartest thing we've ever done.
Hopefully we've not dropped the ball on it.
I don’t think it matters what is in the contract , wasps have no money to rectify the pitch , do any improvements , investment in a new pitch
We can take them to court for breach of contract , we can withhold rent payments etc
They stop us playing at the stadium, you can see from their statement yesterday how they feel
You would think the contract would include being able to play gamesI don’t think it matters what is in the contract , wasps have no money to rectify the pitch , do any improvements , investment in a new pitch
We can take them to court for breach of contract , we can withhold rent payments etc
They stop us playing at the stadium, you can see from their statement yesterday how they feel
Administrator will need to retain staff to be operational?You would think the contract would include being able to play games
We are going to end up moving this season, aren’t we?I doubt it matters
They clearly have zero funds left - this is just becoming a huge problem all round
How can we take ownership of the pitch?We are going to end up moving this season, aren’t we?
If wasps get liquidated I’m sure the council will be in no rush to get us in the stadium, even as tenants.
The best case scenario is probably we sell a key player to fund a new pitch being laid and wasps let us take ownership of pitch maintenance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?