torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Exactly.
Trevor Bayliss??
Did we sell anyone to Bury, or another club in financial trouble?
Stokes went to bury
Not really very positive is it? £4m + transfer profit mostly covering losses, not sustainable at all.
Not sure how the 2 accounts threads got merged, just separated them!
Think I might have done it by accident, was just trying to figure out how to undo it.
Advertising and marketing 17,345
Operating losses increasing - the turnover I assume includes player sales - it’s grim reading
Would you rather have Wasps' accounts or ours?
Things will come to a head soon enough. We're well placed to take advantage of their situation falling apart.
Really low, I'm a partner in a company of 29 people and we could spend that in a month easily.
Fortunately the trajectory of each club is totally oppositeThey are pretty similar - other than the fact we have no physical assets
Or a £35m repayment due with refinancing looking increasingly difficult and an owner burning through the majority of his personal fortune.They are pretty similar - other than the fact we have no physical assets
They are pretty similar - other than the fact we have no physical assets
That's what happens when you get promoted though. Costs are going to go up.
It's not all great, would be much better if we had control of our revenue streams, but with the situation we're in it's not bad either.
Would be interesting to compare to other "similar" clubs at our level. Portsmouth, Peterborough, Doncaster, etc. Imagine Sunderland's would make for some interesting reading.
Or a £35m repayment due with refinancing looking increasingly difficult and an owner burning through the majority of his personal fortune.
there is opportunity that we do not useYou’d have to question whether it’d be worthwhile for us to spend a significant amount on that though. Our fanbase is what it is and our reach only probably goes to about Warwickshire
probably notIt’s not dissimilar. The declared debt we still have owing is £20 million which in reality is secured against nothing
anyone who thinks we are ever having a new stadium is deluded with these figures and next years will be alarming
probably not
£4m debt will increase to £6m due to St andrews
This will reduce to around £2m due to MCCallum and cup income
at that stage you then have a bigger asset in the team and club being in the championship
This is what troubles me. The game of chicken is fine as long as it pays off.next years will be alarming
I doubt Fisher was sat their with the accounts wondering when best to stir shit up on SBT.Fuck me.
Top of the table. Pulling clear. Best time to be a City supporter for many years. I have a great idea. Let's think of a thread that can make people angry and want to have an argument.
Oh well. All a part of being a City supporter.
Fuck me.
Top of the table. Pulling clear. Best time to be a City supporter for many years. I have a great idea. Let's think of a thread that can make people angry and want to have an argument.
Oh well. All a part of being a City supporter.
Were we really paying £4m in wages in League Two?
Were we really paying £4m in wages in League Two?
Sell Bayliss acquire Allen sounds a good model to meThat's the stated model though isn't it? It's the only way we can operate sustainably whilst remaining competitive.
it was after promotion. Reason given as increased costs of promotion as it would be if we went to the championship.
4.6m is wages and salaries but playing budget probably a million or so less.
nope. it's a scare tactic for the twitter brigadeI have a question:
Has there been any transfer of money of debt out of whatever company these accounts are for, to another in the chain of companies. For example the covering of debt repayment.
And if so, how much?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?