No, and as you clearly have read all the posts carefully in this thread and taken the content included on board, you will see I've included Sordell in the praise.
This thread is fucking insane.
its definitely passed the time!This thread is fucking insane.
This thread is fucking insane.
Yes, after I told you.
For all you know they could be doing things for different charities and causes?
Tis what happens when you have people unable to read posts properly
Apart from the kids being in hospital.
I took that info on board didn't I? I didn't dismiss it to suit my point?
I can't decide who I agree with so I'll wait for 24 hours, add up the likes for each poster, do some maths then comment.
I think it needs to be if people can find something like that a negative and have a moan with all of the other shit. Giving £200 each to the kids in hospital is the best thing half of them have done all season.
Now you've spoiled it, I was going to ask if that was you? :'(He cut his finger chopping the onions, dropped the mushrooms all over the floor. Bloody useless.
100% agree, no arguments.
One thing we all know, is most of the players weren't there, for whatever reason, but they weren't there.
Who can't read and where? The bit you making out the others couldnt be arsed or were out shopping?
Or the bit where cc4life is saying the presents aren't enough?
Yes, so my point is you don't know they were all out shopping or couldn't be arsed.
I like it how you keep spouting this, as you have no response to the actual OP.
I can't decide who I agree with so I'll wait for 24 hours, add up the likes for each poster, do some maths then comment.
Shopping was an example. I could have picked Nando's, playing video games, playing golf, getting their hair done?
3 players turning up, and Sordell playing Santa on his own, points to this, IMO.
So every post on a thread can only reply to the OP?
I have replied to that point, you don't know they were out shopping and chose that over going to the hospital.
How does it point to can't be arsed? Because you say so?
I agree with op, well done to the players who visited but 3 members, one coach and someone who doesn't play anymore seems a below par effort.
Ricketts isn't even a player or staff member of the club so puts some of the others to shame.
I think it needs to be if people can find something like that a negative and have a moan with all of the other shit. Giving £200 each to the kids in hospital is the best thing half of them have done all season.
This thread is a new low for skybluestalk. It's 16 pages and 10 minutes of my life I'll never get back.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
noone responding to my improvement post which i can only assume means others now see that i was right all along.
thank you and no apologies needed. i forgive you all. were are all one and i love you all.
driving now. bye
mwah x
I do admire your reluctance to censor the forum and that you allow a little freedom for the crazies, but i think you'd be forgiven if you accidentally pressed the delete button once in a while
Not really, just makes you look a bit silly.
Last year the players bought the kids selection boxes, didn't see a single person moaning about it or a single kid disappointed.
If you read the thread, you'd realise Nick and Torch are making out something that isn't there.
They have no counter argument to the OP, which is: A low turn out from CCFC players in a Coventry hospital, so they say "So charity to sick kids is bad is it?"
**** This is a paraphrase, not a quote, just a summary of the way the thread has gone *****
Yes, then you have to read through both yours and cc4life's comments through the thread.
And at which point/post did I say negative things about those that did go?
I didn't mention the value of the gifts, before you try that.
It was the point about the others not being arsed or trying to make out shopping was more important to them...
They had still donated £200 allegedly according to cc4life.
I asked the question, in the OP, "Or are the rest going to other hospitals?"
The visit would be more valuable than the gifts, IMO. Going to argue that as well?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?