Originally Posted by DazzleTommyDazzle:
To ease your confusion....
I judge people on their actions.
One party has been good enough to come on this site and inform us what is happening. So far I have had no reason to doubt what he says.
The other party, well the less said the better....
Do you really expect a football club to start posting on a fans forum?
Some people think their club statement sounds unprofessional so imagine what people would think if they starting posting on here.
So you want only people on here who agree with you? They'd have to have a single digit IQ looking at the mindless garbage you spout.
Lock yourself in your bedroom and talk to yourself. At least you'll then get agreement.
torchomatic
CCFC Manager
Join DateFeb 2008LocationWarwickPosts5,867
1,773 Like Received In 1,090 Posts
After your foul-mouthed claptrap last night I'm putting you on ignore.
Originally Posted by Ashdown1
Torch.......you are confusing the club with who we all relate and SISU, two completely different entities. One plays football the other repeatedly tells lies and tries to manipulate situations to THEIR financial gain !
Ashdown1....I wouldn't worry too much mate, when he loses an argument he does this....He did it to me last year..didn't last long though!...Mores the pity.
Banks do it all the time
No doubt in my mind the club have got 'plants' posting on here and have had for some time. I don't mean Torchy and Grendel either...At least with ACL/PKWH they admit who they are although of course their could be others on here trying to change hearts and minds.
So you want only people on here who agree with you? They'd have to have a single digit IQ looking at the mindless garbage you spout.
Lock yourself in your bedroom and talk to yourself. At least you'll then get agreement.
The difference is, I think, quite clear. You may not agree with the actions spelt out in the ACL statement, you may disagree with the policy being followed by ACL, you may believe that ACL should be behaving in a different way but you cannot point to a deliberate falsehood. The CCFC statement states as a fact something that is intended to justify their actions, something that is utterly untrue. That is the difference.
Define a sisu lover? Bit odd if someone had a crush on a hedge fund!
Thank God I'm in the minority if my fellow foot soldiers had the same thought processes as you! Nicely summed up with the line that ends "don't belong on a forum".
"The views of people who don't agree with the crowd on here don't belong on a forum."
Torchy, I respect your comments, but you did use the 'SISU are our saviours' quote on the CET forum on several occasions. FACT.:facepalm:
Torchy, I respect your comments, but you did use the 'SISU are our saviours' quote on the CET forum on several occasions. FACT.:facepalm:
I don't have to defend my position or my point of view to the likes of you or anyone else.
Yes, I did. Because they were. There was no one else, at least no one else that ACL would deal with. It's very easy to have the holier than thou, hindsight drenched view of the world that you and many, many others have on here.
I don't have to defend my position or my point of view to the likes of you or anyone else.
No, you don't mate.
However, you do need to aplogise for your vociferious defence of SISU and your 'verbally bullying' of those who dared question SISU's management of OUR club.
Sorry, Torchy, but you are guilty of giving SISU licence to do what they want as the likes of you hounded shareholders to give their shares up in Dec 2007, even calling some who didn't want to do this as being anti-CCFC.
You have been well out of order, buddy.
Why does he need to apologise?. If any bullying is taking place on this forum its from SISU haters who shout down every single opinion that might even slightly stick up for SISU. As far as ic an see this forum encourages free speech....as long as it agrees with the majority.
No, you are right, the 2007 shareholders are thankful for the vitriol thrown their way by the likes of some and the outcome we have now.
I imagine you are disgusted by Joe Elliot then?!
No, you are right, the 2007 shareholders are thankful for the vitriol thrown their way by the likes of some and the outcome we have now.
And the man responsible for everybody giving them up was Mr Joe Elliott, lauded by many on here as a hero! You couldnt make up this level of hypocrisy!
No, you don't mate.
However, you do need to aplogise for your vociferious defence of SISU and your 'verbally bullying' of those who dared question SISU's management of OUR club.
Sorry, Torchy, but you are guilty of giving SISU licence to do what they want as the likes of you hounded shareholders to give their shares up in Dec 2007, even calling some who didn't want to do this as being anti-CCFC.
You have been well out of order, buddy.
Why does he need to apologise?. If any bullying is taking place on this forum its from SISU haters who shout down every single opinion that might even slightly stick up for SISU. As far as ic an see this forum encourages free speech....as long as it agrees with the majority.
So I have to apologise to you and all other fans of the Club and at the same time I'm embarrassing MMM?
So if Tim Fisher came on here and gave his version everyone would "like" everything he says as well?
You're embarrassing me yet again. Your mates have since put out another, new statement. It's superceded the one that birthed this thread. You better get over there now and defend the new position...
You're embarrassing me yet again. Your mates have since put out another, new statement. It's superceded the one that birthed this thread. You better get over there now and defend the new position...
So if Tim Fisher came on here and gave his version everyone would "like" everything he says as well?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?