Astute
Well-Known Member
Yes. Certain criteria only. Resting your best players who have played nearly every game for those who haven't played most games isn't acceptable.
What they could do is sub them early.
Yes. Certain criteria only. Resting your best players who have played nearly every game for those who haven't played most games isn't acceptable.they can rest as many as they like providing criteria is met regarding replacements
No, the rules allow any selection provided at least 10 squad players used in the previous x games are picked.Yes. Certain criteria only. Resting your best players who have played nearly every game for those who haven't played most games isn't acceptable.
What they could do is sub them early.
No, the rules allow any selection provided at least 10 squad players used in the previous x games are picked.
That’s how I understand it.No, the rules allow any selection provided at least 10 squad players used in the previous x games are picked.
With injures and knocks you can circumvent that situation, bench them rather than play them it still keeps within rules of so many from the regular squad not playing or in the squad.. The rules are very lax not as strict as most think. You cant risk a player, you do have to consider their future? rightly or wrongly and a players fitness. bending the rules yes ut who can prove otherwise.?No, the rules allow any selection provided at least 10 squad players used in the previous x games are picked.
Can also name them in the squad and use later if needed. Or start them and change at HT. Several ways of doing it.That’s how I understand it.
No Giles for them today. No Howson. Rested? Got a knock?
Really difficult to prove that a few players aren’t 100%.
Even if a slight knock, if the game isn’t crucial, you don’t take the risk.
Middlesbrough can rest / rotate / not risk a fair few of their first team.
If Doug is happy we would sell I think he’d do it. We’d then have to sell which going on the blues game I reckon we would. Nowhere near a full house again at BlackburnChanging the subject. If we were to play luton or boro in the semis then tickets for them it should be what they give then we give, so if luton give say 1000 then max they get is 2000, if boro give 2000 then we give no more than 2500. would it sell out or more in the home end? give cov the choice with day trippers or not. Its a bit contensious as should we take the money or give home the benifit of more tickets? the atmosphere that cov create is ok ok. So shove them into a corner and F%%4ck them excuse my spelling?
Its dodgy aint it? bending rules which are very flexible. as long as we dont kick off late ? which considering it is away wont be our problem. Sunlan wont see it that if it all goes against them.?Can also name them in the squad and use later if needed. Or start them and change at HT. Several ways of doing it.
But this the time of the season clubs are watched very carefully. There won't be many changes if any at all.
The thing is with play off gate money it is shared betwen all the 4 clubs i think, it dont go to the host? i might be wrong. In playoffs so much goes to EFL regardless then you share betwen all participents?If Doug is happy we would sell I think he’d do it. We’d then have to sell which going on the blues game I reckon we would. Nowhere near a full house again at Blackburn
Yes. Certain criteria only. Resting your best players who have played nearly every game for those who haven't played most games isn't acceptable.
What they could do is sub them early.
The thing is with play off gate money it is shared betwen all the 4 clubs i think, it dont go to the host? i might be wrong. In playoffs so much goes to EFL regardless then you share betwen all participents?
We kicked off late in '97 whilst away. They still blame us for that.Its dodgy aint it? bending rules which are very flexible. as long as we dont kick off late ? which considering it is away wont be our problem. Sunlan wont see it that if it all goes against them.?
And the incident on the M1 that meant our team coach was late getting to WHL was a Sunderland fan's car breaking downWe kicked off late in '97 whilst away. They still blame us for that.
Would Luton sell, say, 4500 tickets for first leg at CBS?Huge away following from Luton
I didn't know that.And the incident on the M1 that meant our team coach was late getting to WHL was a Sunderland fan's car breaking down
Sunderland will beat Preston
horrible horrible feeling we’ll miss out on goal difference
been a great season though
Was that spurs? beyond our control. yes they still blame. They are worse than scousers for blaming. They have no conception that they didnt do it? I assume it is sunlan you are talking about? i dont get why we worry about them, they aint beat us for years not when it matters anywayWe kicked off late in '97 whilst away. They still blame us for that.
Would Luton sell, say, 4500 tickets for first leg at CBS?
It's in the book that the Sunderland fan wrote when he applied to be manager of every team in top 4 divisions. It was his car.I didn't know that.
If that is true, it's the fact of the day.
I didn't know that.
If that is true, it's the fact of
What i am saying is that we dont get a financial advantage coz gates are shared so why di it?If Doug is happy we would sell I think he’d do it. We’d then have to sell which going on the blues game I reckon we would. Nowhere near a full house again at Blackburn
A quarterYou’d want half of Sunderland’s 48000 rather than half of Luton’s 9000.
Just saying.
They’ve sold about 5 for t
I dont know but why give them the choice? double wht you give us is more than enough for them?They’ve sold about 5 for this one
McNally is betterHyam their player of season. Didn’t know.
If we’d have kept him….
Hyam their player of season. Didn’t know.
If we’d have kept him….
That's why the FL will keep a close eye. They don't want Sunderland crying for the next hundred years even if they fall 4 points short.Its dodgy aint it? bending rules which are very flexible. as long as we dont kick off late ? which considering it is away wont be our problem. Sunlan wont see it that if it all goes against them.?
I get it now. So best income is us and Sunderland rather than Millwall or BBurn (judging by their attendance today at least)A quarter
That's why the FL will keep a close eye. They don't want Sunderland crying for the next hundred years even if they fall 4 points short.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?