Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Changing the system (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5849
  • Start date Aug 6, 2018
Forums New posts
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #1
Pressley did it after a half decent season, that then saw the star striker leave.

Didn't go fabulously.

Now... we wait and see this season (we might still go back to it!), but I do have a certain theory that making systems too complicated for lower league players makes it harder for them - a simple 4-4-2 may not win you games in the top flight nowadays, but it scores goals and creates chances in the lower league... and makes mediocre strikers look better than they maybe are.

So... we wait and see, but what's wrong with a 4-4-2?
 
Reactions: stupot07
H

Harry_Walker

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #2
because we can't accommodate our best players in a 4-4-2, where would Andreu play? Where would Bayliss play? Who would be our two strikers?
 
Reactions: shmmeee

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #3
We didn't play that differently to last year really bar andreu being more of attacking midfielder rather than striker

Don't think tactic cost us.
 
C

CCFC_Charlie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #4
Why would we play a formation that doesn’t play to the strengths of our best player?
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #5
Deleted member 5849 said:
Pressley did it after a half decent season, that then saw the star striker leave.

Didn't go fabulously.

Now... we wait and see this season (we might still go back to it!), but I do have a certain theory that making systems too complicated for lower league players makes it harder for them - a simple 4-4-2 may not win you games in the top flight nowadays, but it scores goals and creates chances in the lower league... and makes mediocre strikers look better than they maybe are.

So... we wait and see, but what's wrong with a 4-4-2?
Click to expand...

I think a 4-4-2 doesn’t really accommodate Andreu. Also we have a lot of midfielders but few natural wide players so 4-2-3-1 suits us better in that sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #6
CCFC_Charlie said:
Why would we play a formation that doesn’t play to the strengths of our best player?
Click to expand...
Why would you change a system for one player?

What if that player gets injured?
 
C

CCFC_Charlie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #7
Deleted member 5849 said:
Why would you change a system for one player?

What if that player gets injured?
Click to expand...
Because he’s our best player and he’s not currently injured? Why would you change a system to the detriment of your best player just in case they get injured in the future?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #8
Id play andreu just behind the front 2.
 
Reactions: Otis and Deleted member 5849
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #9
CCFC_Charlie said:
Because he’s our best player and he’s not currently injured? Why would you change a system to the detriment of your best player just in case they get injured in the future?
Click to expand...
I'd focus on the team, not one man. Because then you're in danger of squeezing a bunch of forwards into positions they're not overly comfortable with, and having defenders less assured than they otherwise might be.
 

Greggs

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #10
Nick said:
Id play andreu just behind the front 2.
Click to expand...
Perhaps a shout, until Jones and Allasani are ready at least.
 
Reactions: SkyBlueChris

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #11
The answer is clearly a diamond. 442 and allows Andreu to play in the hole.

You're welcome. Now, onto the Middle East.
 
Reactions: Otis and vow
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #12
djr8369 said:
I think a 4-4-2 doesn’t really accommodate Andreu. Also we have a lot of midfielders but few natural wide players so 4-2-3-1 suits us better in that sense.
Click to expand...

The reason we have lots of central midfielders is, of course, because we've stocked up on them. Do we have *that* many who'd be automatic first teamers anyway? Bayliss, Doyle (ageing, one year has to be when he fades) Ogogo, Kelly (not sure he'd be an automatic starter, anyway at this level?) and then a bunch of futures. The others are about to develop, aren't they? Isn't there a space for Andreu behind two forwards, rather than one? Or playing him as a number 10, while still having two traditional wide players?

We also seem to be stocking up on strikers too, mind you.You could argue if we end up with 5-6 strikers at the club, playing just one of them is more overkill than our midfield situation.
 

vow

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #13
Didn't we play a kinda narrow 442 with Shipley and Bayliss as the wide-ish player's in second half of the season?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #14
vow said:
Didn't we play a kinda narrow 442 with Shipley and Bayliss as the wide-ish player's in second half of the season?
Click to expand...

Not according to Grendel and Nick, it was 4312 (yes I thought so)
 
Reactions: vow

skyblueelephant76

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #15
We could go 4312 with the fullbacks providing the width.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #16
vow said:
Didn't we play a kinda narrow 442 with Shipley and Bayliss as the wide-ish player's in second half of the season?
Click to expand...
We did, sort of. And tbh as that worked, why not do the same again?

The days of the all-out-winger in full flight died in the early 70s bar the odd exception (Hutchison being one!) so it's not overly radical to have wide midfielders rather than out and out wingers.

My main concern is getting players of a lower league level to learn new systems, when we ended up getting ours tweaked to do alright last season by the end of it. Now it *might* be one step back to take two forward if so... but we'd probably best stop signing centre forwards pretty sharpish if so!
 
Reactions: vow

vow

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #17
shmmeee said:
The answer is clearly a diamond. 442 and allows Andreu to play in the hole.

You're welcome. Now, onto the Middle East.
Click to expand...
Wow, too many options now!
Robin's won't change 2 in the middle I reckon, if he did though would it be Doyle or ogogo to be dropped?!
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #18
shmmeee said:
The answer is clearly a diamond. 442 and allows Andreu to play in the hole.

You're welcome. Now, onto the Middle East.
Click to expand...

Only thing that worries me with that is not as much protection on the back 4.

It would rely on the 2 wider players (Bayliss and AN Other) to really help out defensively.
 
Reactions: shmmeee
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #19
vow said:
Didn't we play a kinda narrow 442 with Shipley and Bayliss as the wide-ish player's in second half of the season?
Click to expand...

Yeah but as that is not their natural positions is it wise to do so in a higher league?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #20
shmmeee said:
The answer is clearly a diamond. 442 and allows Andreu to play in the hole.

You're welcome. Now, onto the Middle East.
Click to expand...

Who are the wide players though? Also means one holding midfielder to shield the defence rather than 2 like on Saturday.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #21
Nick said:
Only thing that worries me with that is not as much protection on the back 4.

It would rely on the 2 wider players (Bayliss and AN Other) to really help out defensively.
Click to expand...

It's a moving puzzle though isn't it? If we want more attacking players in the side (two upfront plus a man in the hole) we've got to lose something defensively.
 
Reactions: vow

vow

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #22
djr8369 said:
Yeah but as that is not their natural positions is it wise to do so in a higher league?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Don't see why not, as it worked v well last season in their "unnatural positions" and I certainly have faith in both to not let the team down.
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #23
vow said:
Don't see why not, as it worked v well last season in their "unnatural positions" and I certainly have faith in both to not let the team down.
Click to expand...

I suppose they have JJ, Allassani and maybe Hiwula and Andreu as competition so maybe that is the plan.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #24
vow said:
Don't see why not, as it worked v well last season in their "unnatural positions" and I certainly have faith in both to not let the team down.
Click to expand...
It's also the case that Shipley's starting the season at least as backup, so he's not considered good enough for a central role as of yet, anyway.
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #25
It’s certainly going to be interesting as there’s no obvious system we should play based on the players in the squad.

One strength of the side might be that the system can be changed depending on opposition and available players.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: vow and shmmeee
L

Limey

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #26
In terms of L1 the squad looks to have a superb level of technical ability combined with some pace and power.
If MR can mould these together I think we will be an extremely tidy team.
I expect a 4-3-3 switching between 4-5-1 tact.
 
Reactions: shmmeee and djr8369
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #27
djr8369 said:
One strength of the side might be that the system can be changed depending on opposition and available players.
Click to expand...

If they can do that, great.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #28
Nick said:
Only thing that worries me with that is not as much protection on the back 4.

It would rely on the 2 wider players (Bayliss and AN Other) to really help out defensively.
Click to expand...

It will never work when Jones is fit as he hasn't got the defensive attributes

Also you can't really see how you'd be able to fit two of Doyle, Ogogu and Kelly into it either
 
Reactions: djr8369

ceetee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #29
skyblueelephant76 said:
We could go 4312 with the fullbacks providing the width.
Click to expand...
We sort of played that at the end of last season but nobody covered Grimmer when he was forward so he had to cover back himself. Consequently he was criticised for his defending and struggled to last 90 minutes
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • #30
I think you make a good point NW. Robins does seem to be signing players and trying to fit a system around them, rather than buying players that fit into a system.

If McNulty was here, would Robins be shunting him outside, despite him scoring the vast majority of his goals playing down the middle with Biamou.

I like Andreu, but if he is going to play a no. 10 then we have to get runner in behind Biamou. On Saturday, everything was played in front of the back four and we often overplayed it.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?