ccfcway
Well-Known Member
20 times earnings
I've just valued my house at £2 million. That's the most expensive house in the street. Its the value though as I did it myself.
I've just valued my house at £2 million. That's the most expensive house in the street. Its the value though as I did it myself.
I've just valued my house at £2 million. That's the most expensive house in the street. Its the value though as I did it myself.
Is your house for sale?
But presumably you'd be happy to give it to Tim Fisher for free.
I've just valued my house at £2 million. That's the most expensive house in the street. Its the value though as I did it myself.
Depends if it has a 2 million quid mortgage on it and he can't afford it!
Not impressed by PWKH's comments.
Did you buy it for 2 million?
If so unless some strange things have been done to your house recently by the same bloke trying to buy it , I bet your valuation is not too far off? It certainly shouldn't be zero.
That can't be right. We would have heard about it on here....
Not very professional those comments.
What I don't get is if they are so sure it is worth £6.5 million and nothing less, didn't they agree a million less before? To which the council fella said it was way over priced?
It's not semantics at all. They bought the share from the club.
The fact they should never have got involved in the first place is irrelevant to that.
Not sure if a 'market' value is that relevant in all this. Higgs have got a price they are willing to sell at, if SISU or anybody else for that matter is not prepared to meet that price then there is no sale. A seller is free to ask any price they like, similarly a buyer is free to offer any price he wants.Would be interesting to see a "market" value. Especially as the council thought 5.5 million was way over priced.
If the charity didn't get involved, the club would have gone down the pan - would you have been happy about that at that point in time, with a brand new ground just completed?
The charity bailed out CCFC once, by stepping in then. Now it seems you're asking them to bail out CCFC again (or at least SISU), by handing over their share of ACL for less than they value it.
This wasn't an investment made in the hope of any great return, as can be seen by the fact that they agreed to sell it back at a set formula (and subsequently agreed to sell it back to SISU for less than they bought it for).
It really, really winds me up that there are people here who would have the charity give the share back to SISU. There's a price to be paid for the share, if SISU don't want to pay it then that's up to them, but don't blame the charity for the actions of our owners both past & present.
While of course I think it would be unfair for them to get nothing, people seem to say that the high rent is all SISU's fault because they agreed to it. If the Higgs have bought something that is now actually worthless, who's fault is that?
(just putting it out there)
Maybe it's the fault of those who are trying to make it worthless by their actions, and thereby presumably hoping to pick it up on the cheap.
Would you rather the charity hadn't bought the share, and the club had gone under? Just putting it out there...
Maybe it's the fault of those who are trying to make it worthless by their actions, and thereby presumably hoping to pick it up on the cheap.
Would you rather the charity hadn't bought the share, and the club had gone under? Just putting it out there...
Maybe it's the fault of those who are trying to make it worthless by their actions, and thereby presumably hoping to pick it up on the cheap.
Would you rather the charity hadn't bought the share, and the club had gone under? Just putting it out there...
More use of semantics, it was never meant to be a long term deal, I rather think if Higgs had any inkling their money would be still in the Arena 10 years on they'd never have got involved.
How do you know?
It's not semantics at all. They bought the share from the club.
The fact they should never have got involved in the first place is irrelevant to that.
Caveat emptor
How do you know?
We bought the CCFC shares for a total outlay of £6.5m. We did not expect that we would still be involved in 2014.
Yawn, I'm going by what has been put into the public domain..
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/ne...bull-hugessen-answers-questions-higgs-7031144
How do you know that's true?
Yawn, I'm going by what has been put into the public domain..
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/ne...bull-hugessen-answers-questions-higgs-7031144
Plus I've made it plain I think it was a stupid decision before now.. at the time I'm sure I didn't ,... but circumstances have changed.
Do you think it is a lie?
They got the old board out of a hole very temporarily.
Their choices in doing that should maybe be questioned, but they're the charity not Sisu.
If running Browns which they've taken over doesn't go too well, will we all chip in to make sure that they get their money back?
Yes well worth it to get rid of that T--t Brown.
If it had gone under then so be it, helping out millionaire owners and players shouldn't really be the concern of a charity.
If we'd gone under then, the share in ACL would have become worthless much sooner, and in fact should have gone under in 2007 before Sisu came in and after Robinson and Mcginnity had spunked away the Higgs money.
Take away the emotive stuff about it being a charity, and you have a business that made a business decision, for good or bad.
I don't accept it when people say that social services, libraries and the poor little kiddies are going to suffer because of the CCC loan to ACL, and I don't accept it from the Higgs side either.
Yes well worth it to get rid of that T--t Brown.
Don't think i've ever been in, don't think I'd get past PWKH on the door now either.
Poshest bouncer in town though!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?