Chesterfields fans view (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 2477
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 2477

Guest
Reading their board their arnt happy and alot of the comments about yesterday and their manager sound similar to us under SP.

Well, I went today and quite frankly, apart from OShay, O Neil, Hird and Morsy, we were flat and bereft of any ideas. The new players are way off the pace - Herd in particular - why was he signed? E Banks Blake? He touched the about 4 times - literally. What started as a good season is being eroded by signings and tactics that look suspiciously like - "let them come on to us and we'll hit them on the break, play the through ball quickly - to ...er E banks blake. Our wingers are not good enough, they lack any form of pace or trickery compared to either Colchester or Coventry. The full backs cant handle pace. The centre forwards like Blake - my god why we signed him I don't know. The guy from Wednesday - he needs to be fined and moreso loaned out, as dothe like of Humphreys.
Things settled a bit when O neil went to right back - but I think it was a forward/winger problem today which left the defence overworked.
I have a feeling Saunders has blown our pot of gold on players who are only a shadow of themselves. Hope I'm proved wrong!


Bobby Darling, on 19 September 2015 - 07:58 PM, said:
One up front and static. Poor passing. Players instructed to knock the ball long. If they were not instructed to do that at every opportunity then the manager has lost control. I'm not sure that we have carved out that many chances this season.



We didn't overly knock the ball long today....the reason being we rarely had the fek king thing.......we were terrible today and I can't think of an outfield player to get above a 3/4 out of 10.

Posted Yesterday, 09:07 PM
Much like last time at Coventry, then. Horrible place, horrible day out, and the football seems to reflect it.

Seems we played like a bunch of strangers, which isn't surprising when you think about it - 'cos that's what they are. Give 'em a chance, for heaven's sake.

Goku, on 19 September 2015 - 03:56 PM, said:
Deservedly lost. Negative horrid tactics deserve a negative horrid result. Vile.



what were the negative horrid tactics?.

I thought we'd struggle, but mainly 'cos Coventry are a top team and because we had so many changes.








 

Skyblue4u

New Member
Much like last time at Coventry, then. Horrible place, horrible day out, and the football seems to reflect it.

Bit rich that considering there town is known as Chav-Vegas
 

Bob Latchford

Well-Known Member
Posted Yesterday, 09:07 PM
Much like last time at Coventry, then. Horrible place, horrible day out, and the football seems to reflect it.

And Chesterfield is the Taj Mahal of Derbyshire :facepalm:
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
This is much better! I seem to remember how oppositions fans and managers were always very complimentary as we shot down to League 1.

Much easier to say after beating a poor and feeble team!
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
I thought they looked quite decent myself and shouldn't have any problems down the wrong end of the table. They certainly had no killer through ball and lacked potency up front, but I thought they were a neat and tidy outfit overall and certainly better than other teams I have seen down here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top