BBC News - Texas church shooting: One killed before gunman shot dead by churchgoer
One killed in livestreamed Texas church shooting
You know the world is fooked up when you know people are going to church carrying guns.
So, a guy goes into church and starts shooting people and is then killed by one of the members of the congregation.
You mean you don't take a gun with you to the supermarket?You know the world is fooked up when you know people are going to church carrying guns.
You mean you don't take a gun with you to the supermarket?
View attachment 13782
or when you pop out for a coffee
View attachment 13783
not even when you go out for a burger?
View attachment 13784
Bunch of nutters. Not going to change no matter how many shootings there are, too much money involved.
Texans do love their guns and churches. And pick up trucks.
If the gunman had not been shot by a fellow-churchgoer, he would have killed a lot more people.
And the guy that shot the gunman was part of the church's security detail.
There have been mass-shootings in US churches before, so that seems a sensible precaution to me.
The manipulation of a 4 page document written over 200 years ago is one of the biggest hypocrisies of the self proclaimed greatest democracy in the world.The argument often given by 2nd amendment activists is that they need to be armed to guard against government tyranny. Because the government with a $1 trillion military will really be put off by some wanker with a Kalashnikov
The manipulation of a 4 page document written over 200 years ago is one of the biggest hypocrisies of the self proclaimed greatest democracy in the world.
A vague document that is interpreted by political appointees that periodically sways depending on the balance of the supreme Court. Every chance Trump will affect US politics for many years if he gets to appoint just 1 more judge.
Bit harsh, don’t forget they always seem to be world champion’s at that funny rounders game they play.They tend to pick and choose the times when that document matters. It didn’t matter when they were torturing inmates at Guantanamo or when they invoked stop and frisk. A country that leads the world only in military expenditure, obesity and incarceration rates.
Yup. How can it be a sensible precaution to take a gun to church service?Surely a sensible precaution would be stricter gun laws given a person is shot dead every 3 hours in Texas?
Your post just illustrates the frankly crackpot attitude towards guns in the States.
Shotgun wedding?Yup. How can it be a sensible precaution to take a gun to church service?
It's batshit craziness. Not the answer!
If the gunman had not been shot by a fellow-churchgoer, he would have killed a lot more people.
And the guy that shot the gunman was part of the church's security detail.
There have been mass-shootings in US churches before, so that seems a sensible precaution to me.
The manipulation of a 4 page document written over 200 years ago is one of the biggest hypocrisies of the self proclaimed greatest democracy in the world.
A vague document that is interpreted by political appointees that periodically sways depending on the balance of the supreme Court. Every chance Trump will affect US politics for many years if he gets to appoint just 1 more judge.
Surely a sensible precaution would be stricter gun laws given a person is shot dead every 3 hours in Texas?
Your post just illustrates the frankly crackpot attitude towards guns in the States.
Now there's a novel idea.Or....
stricter gun controls and the people in the church might not have got shot and killed in the first place......
Yep. Really hoping Ginsburg holds out until post-election and Trump doesn't win again. Him choosing another young Supreme Court justice would set the US back a generation. I expect we'll see the irony of both parties taking the exact opposite positions they did when Obama nominated and it was held back until post election because he was a 'lame duck'.
Still find it amazing that a single person gets to nominate members of the highest court which is supposed to be there as a check and balance on the power of that person. What if in a massive tragedy the entire Supreme Court died - the President would get to pick the entire Supreme Court and they could be there for 40-50 years depending on age. Madness.
I always find it funny when the gun crackpots say stuff like "it's in the constitution and you can't change the constitution" even though the right to bear arms is only in because the constitution was changed with the 2nd AMENDMENT.
Problem with electing judges (or any public official) is it tends to get politicised.I hope the UK bin our Supreme Court or adopt the US system of electing judges. It’s anti democratic and a fiasco - I’m sure Corbyn would have done the same if he was elected
I hope the UK bin our Supreme Court or adopt the US system of electing judges. It’s anti democratic and a fiasco - I’m sure Corbyn would have done the same if he was elected
They can't impose strict gun laws because it's unconstitutional.Surely a sensible precaution would be stricter gun laws given a person is shot dead every 3 hours in Texas?
Your post just illustrates the frankly crackpot attitude towards guns in the States.
Criminals will always find ways to aquire guns, and they don't obey gun control laws anyway do they?Or....
stricter gun controls and the people in the church might not have got shot and killed in the first place......
They can't impose strict gun laws because it's unconstitutional.
The US constitution gives US residents the right to bear arms.
Changing the constitution requires two thirds of all States to agee and that will never happen.
Criminals will always find ways to aquire guns, and they don't obey gun control laws anyway do they?
They can't impose strict gun laws because it's unconstitutional.
The US constitution gives US residents the right to bear arms.
Changing the constitution requires two thirds of all States to agee and that will never happen.
Criminals will always find ways to aquire guns, and they don't obey gun control laws anyway do they?
To really understand it you need to live in a country. I lived in Texas for 12 years and it was the safest place I have ever lived.
Not to pick on you Paxman this is the kind of comment you hear so often and I find it mind blowing when all the evidence and statistics show the US have a ridiculous level of gun deaths and controls working in every other country.I lived in Texas for 12 years and it was the safest place I have ever lived.
To really understand it you need to live in a country. I lived in Texas for 12 years and it was the safest place I have ever lived.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?