Are you after his job dogonzalos ?, looks you should be.You have recently done some articles and had a delve into why the Freehold should be sold to SISU. Some have been pleased with this work and appreciated it, others not so much.
Now can you delve a bit into SISU's plan. In particular can you analyse if the Ricoh is not for sale, why it is financially better to rent in Northampton for 5 years whilst building a new stadium?
Can you look into that it now seems the club are not 70 million in debt.
Can you check if we are currently paying 1.2 in interest in loans to a SISU company.
Are these loans increasing due to increased loss of revenue from the club been based at Northampton?
What are the financial implications of 5 years at Northampton some are suggesting is costing us 2 million a year in lost revenue?
What will be the interest repayments on borrowing money to build the new stadium?
How much per year will we pay back in interest on the extra 10 million of lost revenue plus the interest on the debt to build the stadium?
How does this compare to the rent deal that was offered plus the 80% F&B.
How much do SISU value the Ricoh (not exact figures) what would they plan for the business if they did buy it.
How much approximately do the council value the Ricoh. ( ball park figure)
Could the telegraph ask an expert to value it. Only in their opinion if course.
This is where we now need our investigative journalist to probe these questions.
You have recently done some articles and had a delve into why the Freehold should be sold to SISU. Some have been pleased with this work and appreciated it, others not so much.
Now can you delve a bit into SISU's plan. In particular can you analyse if the Ricoh is not for sale, why it is financially better to rent in Northampton for 5 years whilst building a new stadium?
Can you look into that it now seems the club are not 70 million in debt.
Can you check if we are currently paying 1.2 in interest in loans to a SISU company.
Are these loans increasing due to increased loss of revenue from the club been based at Northampton?
What are the financial implications of 5 years at Northampton some are suggesting is costing us 2 million a year in lost revenue?
What will be the interest repayments on borrowing money to build the new stadium?
How much per year will we pay back in interest on the extra 10 million of lost revenue plus the interest on the debt to build the stadium?
How does this compare to the rent deal that was offered plus the 80% F&B.
How much do SISU value the Ricoh (not exact figures) what would they plan for the business if they did buy it.
How much approximately do the council value the Ricoh. ( ball park figure)
Could the telegraph ask an expert to value it. Only in their opinion of course.
This is where we now need our investigative journalist to probe these questions.
You forgot to add "who play their games in another town 34 miles away from their city in front of crowds of 2000 whilst a ground is available in their home city and where the crowd would be significantly higher" I'm sure that was an oversight happy to help.Les when you do all this for Don, could you please benchmark it against other clubs to see how it compares to other clubs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
You forgot to add "who play their games in another town 34 miles away from their city in front of crowds of 2000 whilst a ground is available in their home city and where the crowd would be significantly higher" I'm sure that was an oversight happy to help.
No, I didn't forgot. You almost have to forget the current situation and look at when we were at the Ricoh. Being at Sixfields is an anomaly.
You have recently done some articles and had a delve into why the Freehold should be sold to SISU. Some have been pleased with this work and appreciated it, others not so much.
Now can you delve a bit into SISU's plan. In particular can you analyse if the Ricoh is not for sale, why it is financially better to rent in Northampton for 5 years whilst building a new stadium?
Can you look into that it now seems the club are not 70 million in debt.
Can you check if we are currently paying 1.2 in interest in loans to a SISU company.
Are these loans increasing due to increased loss of revenue from the club been based at Northampton?
What are the financial implications of 5 years at Northampton some are suggesting is costing us 2 million a year in lost revenue?
What will be the interest repayments on borrowing money to build the new stadium?
How much per year will we pay back in interest on the extra 10 million of lost revenue plus the interest on the debt to build the stadium?
How does this compare to the rent deal that was offered plus the 80% F&B.
How much do SISU value the Ricoh (not exact figures) what would they plan for the business if they did buy it.
How much approximately do the council value the Ricoh. ( ball park figure)
Could the telegraph ask an expert to value it. Only in their opinion of course.
This is where we now need our investigative journalist to probe these questions.
No, I didn't forgot. You almost have to forget the current situation and look at when we were at the Ricoh. Being at Sixfields is an anomaly, which a 5 year old could tell you it makes no short term financial sense.
Write to him.
no no no, Andy thorn is a step too far!Les just write an article saying Joy Diversion is an evil Lesbian bitch, PWKH is the next pope and Dimmy Timmy Fisher is a clueless fat twat and you'll will the Sky Blue Talk Impartial Journalist of The Year Award.
If you want extra brownie points suggest we sack Steven Pressley and bring back Andy Thorn.
Directly? If so good and post his response.Just have
Just don't think it should be that hard for an investigative journalist to look into.
How does SISU's long term plan compare to the one they rejected as not financially viable.
No, I didn't forgot. You almost have to forget the current situation and look at when we were at the Ricoh. Being at Sixfields is an anomaly, which a 5 year old could tell you it makes no short term financial sense.
Les just write an article saying Joy Diversion is an evil Lesbian bitch, PWKH is the next pope and Dimmy Timmy Fisher is a clueless fat twat and you'll will the Sky Blue Talk Impartial Journalist of The Year Award.
If you want extra brownie points suggest we sack Steven Pressley and bring back Andy Thorn.
Nelson manfisherAlternatively if you writethat our owner is Mother Joy,PWKH is actually Satan and and our chief executive is Nelson Manfisher will get Grendel creaming in his jeans.
Dont want to mention how Grendel feels about brownie points he might have to brush his teeth again.
Said it before and will say it again, he is a columnist not a journalist otherwise all these questions would have been addressed by him ages ago. Just my opinion
Most media sources have no budget for investigative journalism. What we see is a rewording of information that the individual journalist gets fed with. There is little desire to test for truth in statements given for publication. Only test is for libel.
Why is this so?
The conclusions that are drawn from investigation, if wrong, can lead to court action and loss of job. Simply passing on comment in good faith, and accepting the 'facts' as given, equals safe reporting.
To investigate and to take risks in drawing conclusions needs funding that the CET does not have.
Said it before and will say it again, he is a columnist not a journalist otherwise all these questions would have been addressed by him ages ago. Just my opinion
In the same way an investigative journalist would be questioning the original deal with the lines of PWKH do you mean?
No need for investigative journalism for that. He is often on here willing to answer questions about the original deal. He seems happy to help clear anything up and comes across as very polite and as someone who cares about Coventry.
Wouldn't take much funding for him to pick up the phone and ask people. He doesn't need to don a Dick Tracey hat and overcoat and burgle SISU HQ's safe.
Should also be digging deep into the last regime, sisu, acl and everything to do with the club.
By that I mean digging into things that happened with the club, not stalking people etc.
Most media sources have no budget for investigative journalism. What we see is a rewording of information that the individual journalist gets fed with. There is little desire to test for truth in statements given for publication. Only test is for libel.
Why is this so?
The conclusions that are drawn from investigation, if wrong, can lead to court action and loss of job. Simply passing on comment in good faith, and accepting the 'facts' as given, equals safe reporting.
To investigate and to take risks in drawing conclusions needs funding that the CET does not have.
Should also be digging deep into the last regime, sisu, acl and everything to do with the club.
By that I mean digging into things that happened with the club, not stalking people etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?