Nick
Administrator
I meant the conference bit, the pavilion is obviously not going to create any jobs as a "legacy".
The estimated £5.3 million investment will see a new pavilion installed
This is not refurbishment - this is capital expenditure and will enhance the value of the stadium just at a time WASPS will need to refinance
I am sure that money could be spread better to more deserving businesses in the City
Food outlets created = rental income for little old Wasps
Wonder if it's worth asking the council what the net effect on jobs is, given Wasps made a number of redundancies in the last 12 months
Wonder if it's worth asking the council what the net effect on jobs is, given Wasps made a number of redundancies in the last 12 months
100%.
Will they answer though? If it was a lot you would think they would put it in the press release, they usually go mad for a bit of job creation numbers.
Should all appear in the CBA !
When is that made public?
This is Shmmeee's area of knowledge if he knows
The class is not being an arse about me. Like with like. Your last words also say it all really, snide wankery is all the rage around here, splitting into teams and incapable of seeing anything beyond teams, which then means people get a free fucking pass as they have done all through this.
If you can't see that, that says a lot.
Bit late for Ridley to start piping up now. Fuck off Gary.
Just to re-iterate our position, the Conservative group supports the actions which the council has taken.
"The Conservative party in Coventry has a policy of supporting Coventry City Football Club", is that a different Conservative party to the one which voted to sell Wasps the Ricoh?
"The Conservative party in Coventry has a policy of supporting Coventry City Football Club playing football at the Ricoh Arena", is that a different Conservative party to the one which voted to sell Wasps the Ricoh?
FTFY. Kind of left out the key bit.
Clearly everyone in the council on both sides of the aisle think that Sisu are being litigious for no good reason and should STFU and play at the Ricoh. I’ll leave why they think that up to you.
If you believe that makes a difference perhaps you can explain how the Conservative councillor voting to sell sell the Ricoh to Wasps has helped our situation?FTFY. Kind of left out the key bit.
Clearly everyone in the council on both sides of the aisle think that Sisu are being litigious for no good reason and should STFU and play at the Ricoh. I’ll leave why they think that up to you.
If you believe that makes a difference perhaps you can explain how the Conservative councillor voting to sell sell the Ricoh to Wasps has helped our situation?
I think everybody has already decided why you are acting so desperate on these threads.
Ridley has done a U Turn.
If you believe that makes a difference perhaps you can explain how the Conservative councillor voting to sell sell the Ricoh to Wasps has helped our situation?
What’s the U-Turn? I don’t see the difference between that statement and all the other ones TBH.
Again you have trouble distinguishing between me giving an opinion and me clarifying what was actually said.
Im just pointing out that this statement is just a repeat of what was said in previous joint statements. It’s just restating their position, which seems to be: Sisu need to STFU and agree a rental deal at the Ricoh.
On the Ricoh the position is: We couldn’t agree with Sisu, they said they didn’t want it, so we sold to Wasps and if Sisu stop trying to sue everyone then nothing is stopping CCFC playing there.
These have been the positions for years, unchanged.
I think it must be, the same bloke is on record saying things a lot different to that.
So, what's changed their mind all of a sudden?
They are elected members and therefore public servants aren’t they, not civil servants?This does spare to be a issue at CCC from 1 March to 31 August 2019 they show only 2 members got given something.
In 2017 in a 6 month period
Bigham had
£192 VIP tickets to wasps
Duggins had
VIP tickets to one game worth £280+vat
£100 + vat tickets to end of season award
£150+ ticket to a wasps game at Twickenham
Khan had
£150 ticket to wasp
I wonder if any of that effects the 2nd point on the Govs corporate gift document
The Civil Service Code states that Civil Servants must not accept gifts or hospitality or receive other benefits from anyone which might reasonably be seen to compromise their personal judgement or integrity.
Because all of the other ones have been joint with Duggins, for starters.
Or more press openess?Seen an opportunity with public tide turning I'd imagine.
They are elected members and therefore public servants aren’t they, not civil servants?
Seen an opportunity with public tide turning I'd imagine.
Probably correct mate. I wasn’t trying to be a pedant, just that most public sector employees, including civil servants have to declare any potential conflict of interest On an annual basis.I would assume the rules are the same if not tougher. Was first documented I found.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?