chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Yes it is, if the assertion is that any offer made by SISU would have to be put before the full council then you need to define at what point any talks become an offer.
Is that a serious question?
Yes it is, if the assertion is that any offer made by SISU would have to be put before the full council then you need to define at what point any talks become an offer.
You get paid to fight Wasps corner.
Clutching at straws ? Sisu must love you fighting their corner !!
How is it clutching at straws? Are you seriously going to say every conversation that takes place about the disposal of any council asset goes before the full council?
Point me in the direction of one person that didn't want to give Sisu a chance at the start?
It's a poor argument if that is always your come back when Sisu are criticised !!
To be honest. Sisu are the 'dog shit' on the pavement of life and I just wish they would move on and let us rebuild the club without them.
Other than a few Sisu hangers on, no one wants them here.
Yes it is, if the assertion is that any offer made by SISU would have to be put before the full council then you need to define at what point any talks become an offer.
Nw was very wary!There were a few, Lord Summerisle being one.
You can trawl that line out time and time and time again, but it means f*ck all though if no one wants to buy them out.
Point me in the direction of one person that didn't want to give Sisu a chance at the start?
You're also speculating though aren't you? You are not privvy to all the details. You're not Joy or Ann? You say SISU never made an offer even though Joy met Ann in Mayfair. Now was an offer made during that meeting? Can you say categorically there was or wasn't? What if Joy made an offer but Ann didn't think it was acceptable?
This may come as a shock to you but a council is not a dictatorship it's a democracy. Which means that should an offer had been placed it would have been approved or disapproved at a full council meeting as the Wasps offer had to be. So no it's not supposition to say there was no offer. We've seen what happens when an offer is made.
How can a council debate an informal offer?
The suggestion from SBZ was that Lucas and Sepalla could have discussed the sale of ACL with Lucas dismissing it out of hand. You stated this was not possible as it would have to have gone between the full council. You're now saying that only a formal offer would have to go before the full council.
This may come as a shock to you but a council is not a dictatorship it's a democracy.
And not the side that is running the city...
Even after all this there are still posters praising a hedge fund who moved a club from its home.
/waves
If people had read the right books, the right articles... they'd have kept well, well away.
Wouldn't mind, but I spent however long banging on about the dubious business practices, including some of their past record and... few listened
Still, at least it's good news that more are aware now.
The bad news is any potential owners (Haskell!) get the same unquestioning welcoming that SISU had
Blimey NW, why didn't you tell us that before??
Hmm.
They vote on the big decisions and we vote them in to make the decisions. That's as near as it gets
It's a two way street Nick. Integrity, Honesty, and Transparency. Something we've never had from SISU OR CCC. So don't take the piss by saying that!
They vote on the big decisions and we vote them in to make the decisions. That's as near as it gets
Shame that the Trust didn't manage to get the Ricoh registered as a community asset to stop it being sold to people who might just use it to raise money against.
What happened to that idea anyway?
Always thought it was a good plan myself.
You can't change the fact that it happened.
Nobody is praising it but most realise we need to move on.
to be fair would be nice if we even knew that they were making the big decision to sell the "Community Asset" to Wasps before it was done.
Shame that the Trust didn't manage to get the Ricoh registered as a community asset to stop it being sold to people who might just use it to raise money against.
What happened to that idea anyway?
Always thought it was a good plan myself.
and we all knew where and when that meeting before it happened.
Tell you what, wasn't it an unlucky coincidence they changed the time of the meeting at the last minute.
I'm pleased for you that you have finally come to terms with the Sixfields move. It's important to let go and all that.
The whole thing is ridiculous and a complete waste of time. No idea how they get away with it time after time.
Never had a problem, I just never went.
Nick keeps saying I had a problem and you and others follow like sheep.
Meanwhile the Law finds in favour of Council who don't like owners of local football club.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?