tisza
Well-Known Member
Does handing out large numbers of free tickets not count as threatening CRFC?
Does handing out large numbers of free tickets not count as threatening CRFC?That's the point isn't it? The four years was never mentioned until we were at Birmingham and all of a sudden the council were claiming their previous statements only applied to that initial 4 year lease. It's clearly nonsense as CRFC were mentioned alongside CCFC, "this deal would not have happened if it threatened the future of the Sky Blues or Coventry Rugby Club".
Does handing out large numbers of free tickets not count as threatening CRFC?
What?
Do any of you lot actually read what I post or does the REEEEing start immediately upon sight of my username?
Tempted, but then I remembered this was a thread about the stadium / council / Pete & Mark’s meeting, so an argument about the Labour Party and antisemitism probably won’t contribute much that’s constructive.At least we have Starmer now telling us which are the right Jews to interact with.
Guys I am sorry to have to break this to you all but i just saw Pete outside the ricoh
Clapping
Guys I am sorry to have to break this to you all but i just saw Pete outside the ricoh
Clapping
Has he been lured away from us with the promise of a free plastic flag !
Didn’t think there would be much new mate but fair play ladsWill try to get something up tomorrow between us. I've not had 5 minutes this evening to look through the notes.
In all honesty, there won't be anything particularly mind-blowing or unexpected.
Honestly, did you feel like it was worth it?Will try to get something up tomorrow between us. I've not had 5 minutes this evening to look through the notes.
In all honesty, there won't be anything particularly mind-blowing or unexpected.
Monster Raving Loony Party?Which party is going to break the deadlock and say I’m gonna make a move towards a different future?
I know who my money is on
That might be a key word there. For example could you say any case for damages as a result of any EC investigation is classed as part of current legal action?No request was made to wasps to indemnify any future legal action
Yep we did the answer was that was genuinely what they wanted to happenDid you ask them about the condition of sale that Ann Lucas publicly said about?
Did Reeves say why the council seemed more bothered about the Aldi?
Not really no. But we didn’t get time to talk about AldiSo they just said they want the club in Coventry over and over?
I’m more at if the case is thrown out can sisu go further on the same issue? Would Sisu?That might be a key word there. For example could you say any case for damages as a result of any EC investigation is classed as part of current legal action?
What did they say about the condition that Lucas said about?Not really no. But we didn’t get time to talk about Aldi
Anywhere in Coventry or just the Ricoh?Martin Reeves gave a very clear statement of how they desire Ccfc to play in Coventry as every other party in this mess has also done
Exact wording will be in the minutesWhat did they say about the condition that Lucas said about?
Exact wording will be in the minutes
We asked what was the precise minute and what was the spirit of what it meant? They didn’t have the wording, they wanted the sentence to be true about it not negatively impacting ccfc but they had a duty to the whole city and not just ccfc. We pushed this a little around regretting the impact on the fans and didn’t ccfc deserve special treatment as it’s a 137 year institution that requires passing down from one generation to another with care and consideration and ultimately the answer was ‘for the good of the city’ not just ccfc or the supporters. Martin Reeves did make what to me seemed a genuine claim that since his involvement since about 2008 that ccfc has been treated better than other businesses because it is the football club.
I can see how that’s true in some ways but in other ways. You sold the ground to wasps
Like I said all parties are people who can express themselves well. They all have a bias to their point of view, they all want their party to be successful, they all want ccfc playing in coventry. Which one is gonna break from the cycle of I’m right your wrong, you hurt me so I’m gonna jury you, ive got every right to ..... and sort the mess out??!!!!!
They are just words and they were public words to two fans one of whom is a constituentAnywhere in Coventry or just the Ricoh?
"Which party is going to break the deadlock and say I’m gonna make a move towards a different future?
I know who my money is on "
Who and why?
It was a teams call so I’m not sure how that could be done. I can see how that opinion would be valid up to the rent being clearly too high and the sale of aclYeah but saying "They wanted it to be true" isn't the same as it being true.
Martin Reeves thought CCFC was treated better than any other business? Jesus Christ.
Fair play to you for not bursting out laughing and walking out at that point.
ShitWhat did they say about my garden fence, will they be round to fix it... I hope you remembered Pete
If you're saying the council are correct to say that the promises made at the time of the sale only relate to the 4 year lease the club signed upon returning from Northampton why were CRFC also mentioned when they never had a lease with ACL?
The statements made by the council at the time were very clear. I can't imagine anyone seeing those statements and thinking they obviously mean ACL under Wasps ownership have to honour leases made while ACL was under council / Higgs ownership but past that can do what they like.
Yeah, every party will be giving you their perspectives. Nothing more, and nothing less.Anywhere - felt genuine and I know others will disagree and say you can’t trust a word Martin reeves says.
And to the first point of course it’s not true. One thing that frustrated me was hindsight wasn’t really allowed in their thinking. Some of this I get. How anyone voting for that thought crfc and ccfc wouldn’t be negatively affected is a buffoon an absolute buffoon. Shmmee has said it many times it meant nothing then and means nothing nowYeah but saying "They wanted it to be true" isn't the same as it being true.
Martin Reeves thought CCFC was treated better than any other business? Jesus Christ.
Fair play to you for not bursting out laughing and walking out at that point.
They are just words and they were public words to two fans one of whom is a constituent
Anywhere - felt genuine and I know others will disagree and say you can’t trust a word Martin reeves says.
Can I not say and see what happens? No ok. I’ll dare to say what needs to happen
Sisu - clear statement that the Eu complaint is the last step in legal action against the sale of acl to wasps. If it’s lost we will do no more. That’s their step
...
Wasps - Talk about the damage the Eu complaint caused and how their empathy is for Ccfc supporters and suggest a contingent deal that isn’t impossible for Sisu / ccfc to sign
Thanks for asking I have my roadmap
And to the first point of course it’s not true. One thing that frustrated me was hindsight wasn’t really allowed in their thinking. Some of this I get. How anyone voting for that thought crfc and ccfc wouldn’t be negatively affected is a buffoon an absolute buffoon. Shmmee has said it many times it meant nothing then and means nothing now
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?