Why Cheylesmore ward ?
Why Cheylesmore ward ?Looks like I need 10 people to nominate me in the cheylesmore ward and an agent. Anyone live here?
Pete
Independent - Kerp Coventry City football club in Coventry
You have to live in the ward to put yourself up for election as a ward counciller.Why Cheylesmore ward ?
Well I suppose he’s guaranteed atleast one vote then.You have to live in the ward to put yourself up for election as a ward counciller.
Question, if Pete should win then what.. does he intend to carry out his proper duties as a counciller?
Make a change to the rest of them if he did.Question, if Pete should win then what.. does he intend to carry out his proper duties as a counciller?
Apparently Duggins has said at today's council meeting that agents acting for the football club have had meetings with the council, including one today, regarding sites for a new stadium.
He also said, once again, that the club should drop the legals as a pre-requisite for any talks regarding staying temporarily at the Ricoh.
So going off his own statements something, be it bluff or otherwise, is happening regarding a new stadium but he is happy to see the club move out of the city whilst waiting for a potential stadium build to be completed.
He also said the council couldn't do anything about a new site but has now confirmed they are talking to the club about that. Bloke seems pretty clueless. At least stick to one story.I thought he had no say in whether or not the club could stay at the Ricoh?
He also said the council couldn't do anything about a new site but has now confirmed they are talking to the club about that. Bloke seems pretty clueless. At least stick to one story.
Again, why are people suddenly shocked at a ground share? Same as the shock at the accounts being filed
Cross I think covers mine. When do they accept they have no case nick?shocked or mainly disappointed it has come to this again ?
Assuming CCC/Wasps keep their resolve, are you personally happy at SISUs tactics?Again, why are people suddenly shocked at a ground share? Same as the shock at the accounts being filed
Some bollocks in there too.Covers all the bases.
Looks like SISU are prepared to take the club out of the City.
Will anyone blink first, I don't think so.
Like what?Some bollocks in there too.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
For a start the third opportunity to buy into ACL. Was never gonna happen.Like what?
I'm not happy at any of their tactics. They are all c*nts.Assuming CCC/Wasps keep their resolve, are you personally happy at SISUs tactics?
No, I agree on the one level.I'm putting my tin hat on before I make this point.
SISU were, and perhaps still will be, legally allowed to challenge the sale of the Ricoh. Forget the 'big, bad SISU' narrative for a moment; to make dropping litigation a prerequisite of a new deal is tantamount to blackmail. It may not be illegal (although why it isn't is beyond me) but it is at the very least immoral. Before anyone argues that SISU's actions were immoral, that is not the point - if a government body supports a private company in fighting against another party's legal right to litigation, then it is wrong. Because what if the next time it happens is for a cause or company that you do support?
Is this supposed to be a serious statement? We'll ignore everything SISU said in their piece as the most one sided person you'll ever hear on the subject says they're wrong.many of the issues have been ... dealt with by ... David Johnson of The Jimmy Hill Way
And of course as has been said many times before if they are so confident of victory why the desperation to get legal action dropped.SISU were, and perhaps still will be, legally allowed to challenge the sale of the Ricoh. Forget the 'big, bad SISU' narrative for a moment; to make dropping litigation a prerequisite of a new deal is tantamount to blackmail. It may not be illegal (although why it isn't is beyond me) but it is at the very least immoral. Before anyone argues that SISU's actions were immoral, that is not the point - if a government body supports a private company in fighting against another party's legal right to litigation, then it is wrong. Because what if the next time it happens is for a cause or company that you do support?
Is this supposed to be a serious statement? We'll ignore everything SISU said in their piece as the most one sided person you'll ever hear on the subject says they're wrong.
Clearly not Duggins own words and something that's been prepared for him. Why the refusal to address the specific points raised by SISU? The piece SISU put out, no matter what you think of it, detailed specific dated emails, meetings etc which Duggins has just swiped away with a vague, 'but SISU' as usual. Give us some proper answers.
And sorry but it is completely misleading to say you want the club to stay in Coventry while refusing to speak to them and not turning up to vital meetings. Again he just turns round and says 'SISU' hoping people will fall for it again but unfortunately for him people are waking up to that tactic.
Angry doesn't begin to describe it reading this. Clearer than ever the council will not do a thing to try and ensure the club stays in Coventry. Let's face it they couldn't care less if the club ceased to exist.
Lol, conspiracy Nick is convinced of his unsubstantiated version of reality.Would have thought that was obvious with the telegraph recycling ground share stuff to get people worked up as well.
It has certainly shown David Johnson for what he is as well, they obviously haven't seen people's thoughts on his credibility.
They have no interest in keeping the club here, they think they will just say sisu and nobody will have an issue with them. Then they roll out people like Johnson, dart, fisherbaiter and a couple of others to mislead as well.
Would be interesting to know how realistic the sites being discussed are.
So you keep saying, you aren't doing much disproving yet though. Funnily enough people can see straight through your little circle on social media and what they try to doLol, conspiracy Nick is convinced of his unsubstantiated version of reality.
Lol, following someone on twitter says nothing.So you keep saying, you aren't doing much disproving yet though. Funnily enough people can see straight through your little circle on social media and what they try to do
Your conspiracy stuff looks to be the new version of "sisu apologists" which now doesn't work that you have all been shown up.
Lol, following someone on twitter says nothing.
I doubt you will ever argue using logic, it is all suspicion and unproved or unprovable claims that you understand what is going on between Council/Wasps/CET.
Tell you what, why don't you explain what the owners of the club are doing, because I am at a loss to understand their plan.
Like I say, pure supposition. You dodge the important issue to have a go at me as usual with people who have no real argument.Who says anything about following somebody?
Its that unproved I can't see how obvious people like you are. Funnily enough more and more are seeing straight through as well.
Its ok, you can keep going on about conspiracy like your mates did about sisu apologists. Like I said, you have all strangely been shown up for that when you actually do start apologising for certain sides.
I am using logic, it was logic when I pointed out what people fisherbaiter were up to months ago.... It was logic when I realised it was strange somebody with no interest in ccfc needed two accounts to back themselves to.
Like I say, pure supposition. You dodge the important issue to have a go at me as usual with people who have no real argument.
No you don't. Did you read it on theinternet?You have to live in the ward to put yourself up for election as a ward counciller.
It is misleading, e.g. the rebuttal to the assertion that SISU were never given the opportunity to own the stadium is that they could buy the Higgs share.Covers all the bases.
Looks like SISU are prepared to take the club out of the City.
Will anyone blink first, I don't think so.
Is it because they are costing wasps and the council dead money , costs are set not what is incurredAnd of course as has been said many times before if they are so confident of victory why the desperation to get legal action dropped.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?