Grendel
Well-Known Member
No they are largely costs for defence. Why bother defending an apparent open and shit case?
Is it because they are costing wasps and the council dead money , costs are set not what is incurred
Become a councillorNo you don't. Did you read it on theinternet?
joke answerNo they are largely costs for defence. Why bother defending an apparent open and shit case?
joke answer
Steve Harrison back at the club?an apparent open and shit case?
Council didn't seem so concerned with taxpayers money when it was bailing out failed events at the Ricoh or paying out hush money. No way the cost is the true reason they so desperately want it called off.Is it because they are costing wasps and the council dead money , costs are set not what is incurred
yea when you have been accused of something , just get the duty solicitor not the solicitor you can afford , cause you will get the same outcome lol
joke replyIBut according to you there is no case.
You seem to be saying that the council and wasps have something to hide and it needs suppressing
You haven’t been on here for a while. Has it took that long to extract yourself from Nick Eastwoods rectum? Bit busy up there with you, Duggins, Johnson and the sky blue trust up there at the same time I suppose
joke replyI
Council didn't seem so concerned with taxpayers money when it was bailing out failed events at the Ricoh or paying out hush money. No way the cost is the true reason they so desperately want it called off.
Chiefdave I really admire your passion , don't agreed with you all the time but don't doubt your passion for ccfc , but the question was why they are desperate for sisu to stop the legals , its dead money and timeCouncil didn't seem so concerned with taxpayers money when it was bailing out failed events at the Ricoh or paying out hush money. No way the cost is the true reason they so desperately want it called off.
Maybe they have some sort of skeleton in the cupboard?Chiefdave I really admire your passion , don't agreed with you all the time but don't doubt your passion for ccfc , but the question was why they are desperate for sisu to stop the legals , its dead money and time
your getting funnierYou are the only joke on here. How did you get out? Bit of colonic irrigation
But it isn't really is it? Not in the grand scheme of things. They waste so much time and money on all sorts of rubbish quite happily but we're supposed to believe they're desperately concerned about that when it comes to this.Chiefdave I really admire your passion , don't agreed with you all the time but don't doubt your passion for ccfc , but the question was why they are desperate for sisu to stop the legals , its dead money and time
Agree with you , which makes joys statement about dropping the legals all the more bazar a couple of weeks before the latest rullingMaybe they have some sort of skeleton in the cupboard?
Hate the binary shit. The council need to practically care about helping us stay here and Sisu need to give us some honesty and wasps well Don’t get me started on wasps
How hard can it be for an arrangement to be made. Imbeciles the lot of them
I've yet to hear the council make any reference to the damage the loss of the football club will do to the local economy. For that reason alone they should be doing everything they can.Hate the binary shit. The council need to practically care about helping us stay here and Sisu need to give us some honesty and wasps well Don’t get me started on wasps
How hard can it be for an arrangement to be made. Imbeciles the lot of them
I used to think this as well until I found out you can not claim all your costs , there is a set limit , that's why sisu in my opinion have beaten people in court in the past (hence fishers claim that sisu batter people in court)But it isn't really is it? Not in the grand scheme of things. They waste so much time and money on all sorts of rubbish quite happily but we're supposed to believe they're desperately concerned about that when it comes to this.
If, as is constantly claimed, there is no chance of them losing just see it through. Let the lawyers get on with it and claim as much of the cost back as possible. The loss will be minimal.
This isn't a we'd quite like the legals dropped, or if we can agree a deal the legals have to be dropped. There is a sense of desperation there which leads me to wonder why.
That was a weird reference to be sure. Besides Joy looks nothing like Admiral Yamamoto, much better hair.Duggins going on about Pearl Harbour like a wannabe Churchill while he knows fully well that the club is dispensable to SISU and his words won't change a thing. You can also bet that if this team defies the odds and gets into the play offs he'll be posting selfies at the semi final (who knows where that would be).
Separate the club from the owners holding it hostage and offer the bare minimum-1 season at a time. Seeing as this is in essence the same legal action that started several years ago, I'd like to see Nick Eastwood asked what's changed since he said this in 2014:
“I hope it gets resolved. I don’t think it will affect the relationship between Wasps and Coventry City, said Mr Eastwood.
“We understand there is a difference between ownership and the management and people operating the football club day to day.
“If that is what they feel they have to do to protect the football club, then so be it.'
That was a weird reference to be sure. Besides Joy looks nothing like Admiral Yamamoto, much better hair.
Maybe he's going to surprise us all early on Sunday morning.That was a weird reference to be sure. Besides Joy looks nothing like Admiral Yamamoto, much better hair.
Btw did you find Tim's new stadium while you were up his rectum.But according to you there is no case.
You seem to be saying that the council and wasps have something to hide and it needs suppressing
You haven’t been on here for a while. Has it took that long to extract yourself from Nick Eastwoods rectum? Bit busy up there with you, Duggins, Johnson and the sky blue trust up there at the same time I suppose
Btw did you find Tim's new stadium while you were up his rectum.
We've all for solutions just like brexit we can't get it past the first vote.Lots of proctologists here all of a sudden-maybe one of us has a solution in the rectum?
like i said in previous posts agree a rolling year deal with WASPs and gaurantee to pay their out of pocket court cost if WASP are found not culpible in the proceedingsWe've all for solutions just like brexit we can't get it past the first vote.
In this case no deal would be a disaster.
But again reasonable person is expecting to go in to negotiations with everything already agreed. If they will start talking to each other then there is a chance of working out what commercially acceptable terms are. A continual refusal to speak gets us nowhere.What are commercially acceptable terms?
This has got to be a major sticking point surely.
When did this become widely accepted?It was widely accepted that when CCFC came back the £100k rent was a discounted rent, now people are pushing that the figure should be the norm.
We were paying £1.2m and approx £400K a year in additional charges while in the Championship. That was for use of the Ricoh with primacy as well as the club offices, club shop and ticket office all being based permanently at the Ricoh. I don't think there is anyone who still claims that wasn't far too high.Say Wasps simply offer a £300k rent plus match day expenses no access to F&B income. Is that turned down out of principle or is the pragmatic approach to accept it for the 5 years required and focus on increasing match day attendances?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?