Astute
Well-Known Member
Renowned expert in acting like an idiot more like.
The trusts open letter said that Tim Fisher is a world renowned expert in law. I doubt that.
Do you agree with the actions of Joy?
Because the current situation concerns if the council sell the ground to a consortium funding a rugby club from London - anything else at this present time is an irrelevance.
Do you agree with the policing strategy of Harry Callaghan in the Dirty Harry series. Both are equally relevant.
Do you agree with he councils action? Sky blue John does.
And as usual you post something that is of total irrelevance whilst trying to make an irrelevant point.
Do you agree with he councils action? Sky blue John does.
Pot Kettle Black
So what are you trying to say?
So CCC could have handled this all better. SISU should have handled it much better. And now we have Fisher contradicting what Joy said. You couldn't make it up........
Am astounded that some people seem to think that the council's actions here are reasonable. There would only be one reasonable response to this offer that is to the detriment of two of the city's sporting clubs. No.
So do I.
If we later find out that SISU are involved in the Wasps consortium - the same people will be spitting blood at the injustice of it all.
I'm saying you should put your hands up and admit both sides are duplicitous, secretive and manipulative.
No one is interested in your opinion, you've shown yourself to be no fan of CCFC. Cretin
Surely there are more things than the jr, like the situation now? Talk about holding onto something.Because it was proven in the JR ?
Remind me who ended up paying the costs because if what you are saying is true, wouldn't each party have paid their own costs ?
I'm saying you should put your hands up and admit both sides are duplicitous, secretive and manipulative.
How have I shown myself to be "no fan of CCFC" ?
I wonder why I spend considerable time, money and emotional energy travelling to home and way games from London, and spend my time on the CCLSC committee doing work for them on an entirely voluntary basis?
Could it be that I disagree with your childish and pathetic view where CCFC are entitled to a free stadium and anyone who blocks this is a baddie? I love CCFC but hate SISU and what's bad for SISU is good for CCFC.
You're the cretin.
Absolute rubbish. The Judicial Review - impartially head, clearly showed where culpability lay.
Even since returning to the Ricoh, Tim Fisher, CEO of the football club, is still talking in terms of the new stadium, and the necessity for a freehold.
Against that backdrop, and in the face of being left with a white elephant, the council have seemingly done a deal that will prove in the best interests of the 98% of the City's population that don't go to games.
If you don't like the idea of a franchise team, rocking into town, by all means bleat on - I can understand where you are coming from.
But you really have to look to Mr Fisher and his declarations if you want to understand why we are where we are. And his tenure is the reason those players are no longer at the football club
But they aren't - your description applies to SISU only. The council are entitled to sell ACL to whoever they want - morally and contractually. So swivel on it.
But they aren't - your description applies to SISU only. The council are entitled to sell ACL to whoever they want - morally and contractually. So swivel on it.
We are all agreed that the club/ground situation is a total mess. The question is, who is to blame?
To answer that, just ask yourself who has acted reasonably and who hasn't. Any fair-minded person who takes their Sky Blues -tinted specs off can see that for the most part ACL/CCC have acted pretty reasonably, whilst SISU have acted like a complete bunch of bastards.
Might be a good idea to wait for the outcome of the appeal before you state the obvious as it stands at this moment.
So, are you happy about it then? Even if it is at the detriment of the football club you claim to support?
Now the council are circumventing the right of Coventry City to have first refusal on the 50% share in ACL. How can you defend this spider?
In your fantasy world of this forcing SISU to leave who is going to want to buy a homeless club with a short term tenancy with an indebted stadium owner (even more indebted than ACL?
Now the council are circumventing the right of Coventry City to have first refusal on the 50% share in ACL. How can you defend this spider?
In your fantasy world of this forcing SISU to leave who is going to want to buy a homeless club with a short term tenancy with an indebted stadium owner (even more indebted than ACL?
Utter bullshit
In your opinion but NOT MINE! PUSB!
it looks highly likely that the football club will have to build a new stadium elsewhere..
The club's current owners.I imagine the answer is that Joy has stated she doesn't want to get involved. Remember, the only people who say they want the club to leave the Ricoh are the clubs owners.
It's not bullshit you cretin - or, if you think it is, explain why?
My view is predicated on the principle that the best outcome for the long-term revival of CCFC is for SISU to leave ASAP. And this deal makes this far more likely. Therefore worth supporting. You can't categorically prove that is bullshit - in fact, you are talking about of your arse.
Keep your worthless comments to yourself; adults are trying to have a serious discussion.
Keep your worthless comments to yourself; adults are trying to have a serious discussion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?