Oh, here is me asking for proof the club won't exist? That isn't a fact, it's an opinion.
Would never ever support any team other than Coventry City FC whoever owns the club or wherever they play (always assuming & believing, they'll be back in Coventry), although must say I don't think it'll be at the Ricoh.
Depends what you mean by 'the club'.
The club is about Coventry and the fans more than anything. The fact is its not in Coventry,maybe for years, and 'home' gates are terrible --what is increasingly keeping the club alive is actually away support.
That is actually the lowest attendance in the whole division this season.
http://espnfc.com/stats/_/league/eng.3/english-league-one?cc=5739
Its an educated guess.
FFP will kick in soon, meaning within a few years a competitive team will not be possible.
No at worst it means a transfer embargo and probably not even that.
More lies and deception.
If FFP isn't important (and therefore income streams also aren't), can you tell me why my club isn't playing in my city?
It is important as additional revenue allows a calacity to build a stronger squad but its something you keep saying will force us to sell players. It won't even if we don't get dispensation which we almost certainly will.
We have the 4th worst average attendance for the season so far in the entire country. Only Morecombe, Dagenham & Acrington have an average worse than ours. To put things into perspective in the conference Luton, Wrexham, Grimsby, Cambridge, Chester & Lincoln's is better than ours! (Stats taken from Football365)How long do you think this farce can carry on? I'd be interested to hear your opinion on this......Is it proof or an opinion? Does that line confirm the club won't exist?
We have the 4th worst average attendance for the season so far in the entire country. Only Morecombe, Dagenham & Acrington have an average worse than ours. To put things into perspective in the conference Luton, Wrexham, Grimsby, Cambridge, Chester & Lincoln's is better than ours! (Stats taken from Football365)How long do you think this farce can carry on? I'd be interested to hear your opinion on this......
Under normal circumstances yes, but we have FFP guidelines to follow. This means we have a budget of a mid table conference team. We are going only 1 way unless the tide turns fastYou are assuming that the low attendance means unsustainable funding. The claim is that the gap is being funded so attendances are largely irrelevant
You are assuming that the low attendance means unsustainable funding. The claim is that the gap is being funded so attendances are largely irrelevant
If someone on here stated all that, I think you'd be asking for some evidence. How long do you think they will fund the gap?
They provided a 3 year funding plan to the Football League. No one knows who is funding it but the losses in real finance terms are not huge. We also don't know the motivation for funding but we we know a plan was approved.
They provided a 3 year funding plan to the Football League. No one knows who is funding it but the losses in real finance terms are not huge. We also don't know the motivation for funding but we we know a plan was approved.
When I spoke to the FL back in August and asked them how they had been convinced that the club could not possibly play in Coventry, I was told that Otium/SISU had told them so.
I have no reason to believe that their due diligence on the funding plan was any less facile.
Joy Seppala said:The financial industry has contracted. But our private equity funds are the same funds we’ve always had. The hedge funds have contracted but the private equity funds are not dependent on market fluctuations. They have long term investors. They put the money in. They do not take it in and out.
Ah, found the (suggested!) answer:
My emphasis.
I reckon 2015 is absolute judgement day for a review of if working or not...
If you fancy being a dear you can probably find the answer
Standard SISU pratice is funds for 8 years, extended to 10 if needed. The 10 year extension would take you to football league covering... but 8 years sees our time up in 2015 at the latest.
However, a little nagging thought has me recall something about them using new funds now... I just can't be bothered to check now, it's sad enough I wake up and read this with my tea and toast, without going beyond passive engagement
8-10 years, that'd be fun(!)
If I was going to be any other species, deer wouldn't be too bad....
As I think you know, I was suggesting that based on what they told me, I could imagine that their approval of the plan was probably based on them asking SISU if they really had the money and then saying - OK that's good!
Of course, but it's more fun to guess the answer
I'd also guess the proof went something along the lines of 'here's our standard practice with our private equity funds - see? we have time left' and no more.
At which point you smile and nod, having got a bit lost as they start talking Binomial Tree Parameters for no real reason other than small talk... and usher them out the door!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?